• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共享领导对员工建言行为的“双刃剑”效应。

The "double-edged sword" effect of shared leadership on employee voice behavior.

作者信息

Bai Yina, He Haoran

机构信息

School of Business Administration, Liaoning Technical University, Huludao, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 May 23;16:1560554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1560554. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1560554
PMID:40486889
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12142339/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the dual-path effects of shared leadership on employee voice behavior through the Empowerment-Servitude Model, with a focus on uncovering the underlying psychological mechanisms. Additionally, it identifies key organizational and individual factors influencing employee voice behavior, offering theoretical insights for strategies aimed at behavioral enhancement.

METHODS

This study adopted a multi-method approach, integrating online questionnaires and on-site enterprise visits across two time phases. Data collection yielded 624 valid responses from 13 corporations in Dalian, which were subsequently analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

The results suggest that, on the one hand, shared leadership, as an empowerment mechanism, positively influences employee voice behaviors through the empowerment pathway associated with organizational status perception. On the other hand, shared leadership, as a depletion mechanism, negatively impacts employee voice behaviors via the servitude pathway, characterized by emotional exhaustion. Employee empowerment expectations play a critical role in triggering these contrasting mechanisms. Specifically, higher levels of employee empowerment expectations mitigate the negative impact of the depletion mechanism while enhancing the positive effects of the empowerment mechanism.

DISCUSSION

This study makes three key contributions to the literature: first, it advances a nuanced understanding of the relationship between shared leadership and employee voice behavior. Second, by examining the moderating role of employee empowerment expectations, it elucidates boundary conditions influencing this relationship. Third, the findings underscore the criticality of empowerment expectations in organizational practice, suggesting that managers implementing shared leadership should systematically assess employees' subjective empowerment expectations, and leverage these expectations to enhance the model's positive effects on voice behaviors.

摘要

引言

本研究通过赋权 - 奴役模型探究共享领导对员工建言行为的双重路径效应,重点揭示其潜在心理机制。此外,本研究还识别了影响员工建言行为的关键组织和个体因素,为旨在促进建言行为的策略提供理论见解。

方法

本研究采用多方法研究路径,在两个时间阶段整合了在线问卷调查和实地企业走访。数据收集阶段共收到来自大连13家企业的624份有效回复,并随后进行了统计分析。

结果

结果表明,一方面,共享领导作为一种赋权机制,通过与组织地位认知相关的赋权路径对员工建言行为产生积极影响。另一方面,共享领导作为一种损耗机制,通过以情感耗竭为特征的奴役路径对员工建言行为产生负面影响。员工的赋权期望在触发这些相反机制中起着关键作用。具体而言,较高水平的员工赋权期望减轻了损耗机制的负面影响,同时增强了赋权机制的积极作用。

讨论

本研究在文献方面做出了三项关键贡献:第一,深化了对共享领导与员工建言行为之间关系的细微理解。第二,通过考察员工赋权期望的调节作用,阐明了影响这种关系的边界条件。第三,研究结果强调了赋权期望在组织实践中的重要性,表明实施共享领导的管理者应系统评估员工的主观赋权期望,并利用这些期望增强该模型对建言行为的积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a9a/12142339/aa405b99adb6/fpsyg-16-1560554-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a9a/12142339/9c87880a768e/fpsyg-16-1560554-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a9a/12142339/80724ce9a335/fpsyg-16-1560554-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a9a/12142339/aa405b99adb6/fpsyg-16-1560554-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a9a/12142339/9c87880a768e/fpsyg-16-1560554-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a9a/12142339/80724ce9a335/fpsyg-16-1560554-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a9a/12142339/aa405b99adb6/fpsyg-16-1560554-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
The "double-edged sword" effect of shared leadership on employee voice behavior.共享领导对员工建言行为的“双刃剑”效应。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 23;16:1560554. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1560554. eCollection 2025.
2
The effect of shared leadership on employee resilience: wielding the double-edged sword.共享领导对员工复原力的影响:挥舞双刃剑
Front Psychol. 2025 Feb 20;16:1441660. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1441660. eCollection 2025.
3
Exploring the impact of platform leadership on employee innovative behavior: a sequential explanatory mixed method.探索平台领导力对员工创新行为的影响:一种顺序解释性混合方法。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 21;16:1435683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1435683. eCollection 2025.
4
Ambidextrous Leadership and Employee Voice Behavior: The Role of Work Motivation and Ambidextrous Culture.双元领导与员工建言行为:工作动机和双元文化的作用。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 Oct 7;15:2899-2914. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S385033. eCollection 2022.
5
As above, so below? The influence of leader humor on bootleg innovation: The mechanism of psychological empowerment and affective trust in leaders.上之所欲,下必从之?领导幽默对非正式创新的影响:心理授权与对领导情感信任的作用机制
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 16;13:956782. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.956782. eCollection 2022.
6
The impact of middle managers' digital leadership on employee work engagement.中层管理者的数字领导力对员工工作投入度的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 28;15:1368442. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1368442. eCollection 2024.
7
Does justice matter in voice? Inclusive leadership and employee voice: the moderating role of organizational justice perception.公平在员工发声中重要吗?包容性领导与员工发声:组织公平感的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 11;14:1313922. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1313922. eCollection 2023.
8
Money talks in working behavior: impact of unethical leadership on psychological empowerment, attitude towards doing well, and deviant work behavior.金钱在工作行为中起作用:不道德领导对心理授权、做好工作的态度以及越轨工作行为的影响。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Apr 24;13(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02717-w.
9
The Impact of Paradoxical Leadership on Employee Voice Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model.悖论式领导对员工建言行为的影响:一个有调节的中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:537756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537756. eCollection 2020.
10
Relational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior: do employee well-being and employee voice matter?关系型领导与组织公民行为:员工幸福感和员工发声是否重要?
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2023 Nov 9;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-06-2023-0041.

本文引用的文献

1
Ethical Leadership and Followers' Emotional Exhaustion: Exploring the Roles of Three Types of Emotional Labor toward Leaders in South Korea.伦理型领导与下属情绪耗竭:探究韩国三种领导导向情绪劳动的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 15;18(20):10862. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010862.
2
Mechanisms linking authentic leadership to emotional exhaustion: The role of procedural justice and emotional demands in a moderated mediation approach.将真诚领导与情绪耗竭联系起来的机制:程序公正和情绪要求在调节中介模型中的作用。
Ind Health. 2017 Apr 7;55(2):95-107. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2016-0046. Epub 2016 Nov 3.
3
Initiating and utilizing shared leadership in teams: The role of leader humility, team proactive personality, and team performance capability.
在团队中启动和利用共享领导力:领导者谦逊、团队进取人格和团队绩效能力的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2016 Dec;101(12):1705-1720. doi: 10.1037/apl0000159. Epub 2016 Sep 12.
4
When the customer is unethical: the explanatory role of employee emotional exhaustion onto work-family conflict, relationship conflict with coworkers, and job neglect.当顾客不道德时:员工情绪耗竭对工作-家庭冲突、与同事的关系冲突和工作疏忽的解释作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1188-203. doi: 10.1037/a0037221. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
5
Transformational leadership moderates the relationship between emotional exhaustion and turnover intention among community mental health providers.变革型领导能够调节社区心理健康服务提供者情绪耗竭与离职意愿之间的关系。
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Aug;49(4):373-9. doi: 10.1007/s10597-011-9463-0. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
6
An examination of "nonleadership": from laissez-faire leadership to leader reward omission and punishment omission.对“非领导行为”的审视:从放任型领导到领导者奖励缺失与惩罚缺失
J Appl Psychol. 2008 Nov;93(6):1234-48. doi: 10.1037/a0012875.
7
To empower or not to empower your sales force? An empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction and performance.是否赋予销售团队权力?领导授权行为对客户满意度和绩效影响的实证研究。
J Appl Psychol. 2005 Sep;90(5):945-55. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.945.
8
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.
9
Perceived supervisor support: contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention.感知到的上级支持:对感知到的组织支持和员工留任意愿的贡献。
J Appl Psychol. 2002 Jun;87(3):565-73. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565.
10
Job burnout.职业倦怠
Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397-422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397.