Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Sport and Exercise Science Research Centre, School of Applied Sciences, London South Bank University, London, United Kingdom.
Hum Mov Sci. 2021 Apr;76:102769. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2021.102769. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
Rapid stepping to preserve stability is a crucial action in avoiding a fall. It is also an important measure in the assessment of fall-resisting skills. We examined whether volitional step execution correlates with recovery stepping performance after sudden balance loss for adults of different ages. In addition, we investigated whether volitional step performance can discriminate between individuals with high and low balance recovery capabilities, i.e. between those making single versus multiple steps after balance perturbation. Healthy adults (28 young, 43 middle-aged and 26 older; 24 ± 4, 52 ± 5 and 72 ± 5 years respectively) performed a single step in the anterior direction volitionally in response to a mechanical stimulus to the heel. In a second stepping task, participants experienced sudden anterior balance loss in a lean-and-release protocol. For both tasks, an optical motion capture system was used to assess stepping kinematics. We found on average 28% shorter reaction times, 46% faster maximal step velocities and 48% higher rates of increase in base of support across all participants after sudden balance loss compared to volitional stepping (p < 0.001). There was a significant age-related decline in recovery stepping performance after sudden balance loss: 24/26 older, 15/43 middle-aged and none of the younger adults required two or more steps to regain balance (p < 0.001). Multiple- compared to single-steppers had on average 23% shorter step lengths and 12% lower maximal step velocities for the lean-and-release task (p < 0.01). Multiple-steppers also had reduced rates of increase in base of support for both stepping tasks (14% for balance recovery and 11% for volitional stepping). Furthermore, in examining the relationship between the results of the two tasks, only weak to moderate correlations were observed for step velocity and rate of increase in base of support (0.36 ≤ r ≤ 0.52; p < 0.001). Thus, performance in volitional step execution has a low potential to explain variability in recovery response after sudden balance loss in adults across the lifespan and hence seems less suitable to be used to identify deficiencies in reactive stepping responses necessary to cope with sudden balance disturbances.
快速跨步以保持稳定是避免跌倒的关键动作。它也是评估防跌倒能力的重要措施。我们研究了不同年龄段成年人在突然失去平衡后,自愿执行步幅与恢复跨步表现之间的关系。此外,我们还研究了自愿步幅表现是否可以区分平衡恢复能力较高和较低的个体,即平衡受到干扰后,个体是只迈一步还是多步。健康成年人(28 名年轻人、43 名中年人、26 名老年人;年龄分别为 24 ± 4、52 ± 5、72 ± 5 岁)自愿向脚跟施加机械刺激,向前迈一步。在第二步任务中,参与者在倾斜-释放协议中经历了突然的前向平衡丧失。对于两个任务,都使用光学运动捕捉系统评估跨步运动学。与自愿跨步相比,我们发现所有参与者在突然失去平衡后平均反应时间缩短了 28%,最大跨步速度提高了 46%,支撑基底的增加速度提高了 48%(p < 0.001)。与突然失去平衡后的恢复跨步表现相关的年龄呈显著下降趋势:26 名老年人中有 24 名、43 名中年人中有 15 名、没有一名年轻人需要两步或更多步才能恢复平衡(p < 0.001)。与单步相比,多步的人在倾斜-释放任务中平均步长缩短了 23%,最大跨步速度降低了 12%(p < 0.01)。多步者在两个任务中的支撑基底增加速度都降低(平衡恢复任务降低 14%,自愿跨步任务降低 11%)。此外,在考察两个任务结果之间的关系时,仅观察到步速和支撑基底增加速度之间存在弱到中度的相关性(0.36 ≤ r ≤ 0.52;p < 0.001)。因此,在整个生命周期中,成年人在自愿执行步幅方面的表现,对突然失去平衡后的恢复反应的变异性的解释能力较低,因此似乎不太适合用于识别应对突然平衡干扰所需的反应性跨步反应的缺陷。