Suppr超能文献

预防跌倒的代偿性保护步策略的分组及定义的跨学科专家共识:一项电子德尔菲法研究

Interdisciplinary expert agreement on group and definitions for compensatory protective step strategies to prevent falls: A e-Delphi method study.

作者信息

Melo-Alonso Maria, Leon-Llamas Juan Luis, Villafaina Santos, Gomez-Alvaro Mari Carmen, Olivares Pedro R, Padilla-Moledo Carmen, Gusi Narcís

机构信息

Didáctica de la Expresión Musical, Plástica y Corporal, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Grupo de Investigación en Actividad Física, Calidad de Vida y Salud (AFYCAV), Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain; Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Deporte (INIDE), Cáceres, Spain.

Didáctica de la Expresión Musical, Plástica y Corporal, Facultad de Ciencias del Deporte, Grupo de Investigación en Actividad Física, Calidad de Vida y Salud (AFYCAV), Universidad de Extremadura, Cáceres, Spain; Instituto de Investigación e Innovación en Deporte (INIDE), Cáceres, Spain.

出版信息

Braz J Phys Ther. 2025 May 20;29(4):101227. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2025.101227.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Older adults have a high probability of experiencing falls during activities of daily living, which can lead to fear of falling, alterations in gait patterns, decreased mobility, reduced social interactions, and limited ability to perform various tasks. Previous studies examining gait in the presence of perturbations have identified and analyzed several protective gait strategies aimed at preventing falls. However, there is a lack of standardized terminology and definitions for these strategies, hindering comparison and collaborative progress among researchers and professionals.

OBJECTIVE

To unify definitions of compensatory protective step strategies and establish a standardized terminology.

METHODS

This study adapted the Conducting and Reporting of Delphi Studies (CREDES) guidelines and followed a chronological sequence: 1) Preliminary phase: A literature review and both quantitative (three dimensions: relevance, wording, and identification, assessed using a Likert-type scale (1 to 5) and qualitative (an open-ended question) assessment were conducted; 2) Exploratory phase: Expert panel selection (n = 14) and the e-Delphi study were conducted; and 3) Final phase: Expert opinions were collected and analyzed. Content validity was assessed using Aiken's V coefficient.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated high levels of validity (V ≥ 0.68) for all definitions, with none being eliminated based on Aiken's V critical value.

CONCLUSION

A precise definition was developed for each of the 14 compensatory protective step strategies (13 identified in the scoping review and one added by the expert panel). In total, the number of definitions was reduced from 61 to 14, with one definition for each of the compensatory protective step strategies identified.

摘要

背景

老年人在日常生活活动中发生跌倒的可能性很高,这可能导致跌倒恐惧、步态模式改变、活动能力下降、社交互动减少以及执行各种任务的能力受限。先前研究在存在干扰的情况下检查步态时,已经识别并分析了几种旨在预防跌倒的保护性步态策略。然而,这些策略缺乏标准化的术语和定义,阻碍了研究人员和专业人员之间的比较与合作进展。

目的

统一补偿性保护性步行动作策略的定义并建立标准化术语。

方法

本研究采用了德尔菲研究的实施与报告(CREDES)指南,并遵循时间顺序:1)初步阶段:进行文献综述以及定量(三个维度:相关性、措辞和识别,使用李克特量表(1至5)评估)和定性(一个开放式问题)评估;2)探索阶段:进行专家小组选择(n = 14)和电子德尔菲研究;3)最终阶段:收集并分析专家意见。使用艾肯V系数评估内容效度。

结果

所有定义的结果均显示出较高的效度水平(V≥0.68),没有根据艾肯V临界值排除任何定义。

结论

为14种补偿性保护性步行动作策略中的每一种都制定了精确的定义(在范围综述中确定了13种,专家小组增加了1种)。总共,定义数量从61个减少到14个,为确定的每种补偿性保护性步行动作策略都有一个定义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3411/12148634/083d28e48437/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验