Division of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Curr Med Sci. 2021 Feb;41(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11596-021-2311-8. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
Currently, little in-depth evidence is known about the application of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with COVID-19 at 7 designated hospitals in Wuhan, China. The patients were followed up until June 30, 2020. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the risk factors associated with unsuccessful ECMO weaning. Propensity score matching was used to match patients who received veno-venous ECMO with those who received invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV)-only therapy. Of 88 patients receiving ECMO therapy, 27 and 61 patients were and were not successfully weaned from ECMO, respectively. Additionally, 15, 15, and 65 patients were further weaned from IMV, discharged from hospital, or died during hospitalization, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, a lymphocyte count ≤0.5×10/L and D-dimer concentration >4× the upper limit of normal level at ICU admission, a peak PaCO >60 mmHg at 24 h before ECMO initiation, and no tracheotomy performed during the ICU stay were independently associated with lower odds of ECMO weaning. In the propensity score-matched analysis, a mixed-effect Cox model detected a lower hazard ratio for 120-day all-cause mortality after ICU admission during hospitalization in the ECMO group. The presence of lymphocytopenia, higher D-dimer concentrations at ICU admission and hypercapnia before ECMO initiation could help to identify patients with a poor prognosis. Tracheotomy could facilitate weaning from ECMO. ECMO relative to IMV-only therapy was associated with improved outcomes in critically ill COVID-19 patients.
目前,关于体外膜肺氧合(ECMO)治疗在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者中的应用,我们知之甚少。本回顾性多中心队列研究纳入了中国武汉 7 家指定医院的 COVID-19 患者。这些患者的随访时间截至 2020 年 6 月 30 日。采用单因素和多因素逻辑回归分析确定与 ECMO 撤机失败相关的危险因素。采用倾向评分匹配法匹配接受静脉-静脉 ECMO 治疗的患者与仅接受有创机械通气(IMV)治疗的患者。在 88 例接受 ECMO 治疗的患者中,分别有 27 例和 61 例患者 ECMO 撤机成功和失败。此外,分别有 15 例、15 例和 65 例患者进一步从 IMV 撤机、出院或住院期间死亡。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,入院时淋巴细胞计数≤0.5×10/L 和 D-二聚体浓度>正常上限的 4 倍、ECMO 启动前 24 h 内峰值 PaCO >60 mmHg 以及 ICU 期间未行气管切开术与 ECMO 撤机的可能性较低独立相关。在倾向评分匹配分析中,混合效应 Cox 模型检测到 ICU 入院后住院期间 ECMO 组 120 天全因死亡率的风险比较低。入院时存在淋巴细胞减少症、D-二聚体浓度较高和 ECMO 启动前存在高碳酸血症有助于识别预后不良的患者。气管切开术有助于 ECMO 撤机。与仅接受 IMV 治疗相比,ECMO 治疗与危重症 COVID-19 患者的改善结局相关。