Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Artif Organs. 2022 Jul;46(7):1249-1267. doi: 10.1111/aor.14261. Epub 2022 May 1.
Myocardial damage occurs in up to 25% of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases. While veno-venous extracorporeal life support (V-V ECLS) is used as respiratory support, mechanical circulatory support (MCS) may be required for severe cardiac dysfunction. This systematic review summarizes the available literature regarding MCS use rates, disease drivers for MCS initiation, and MCS outcomes in COVID-19 patients.
PubMed/EMBASE were searched until October 14, 2021. Articles including adults receiving ECLS for COVID-19 were included. The primary outcome was the rate of MCS use. Secondary outcomes included mortality at follow-up, ECLS conversion rate, intubation-to-cannulation time, time on ECLS, cardiac diseases, use of inotropes, and vasopressors.
Twenty-eight observational studies (comprising both ECLS-only populations and ECLS patients as part of larger populations) included 4218 COVID-19 patients (females: 28.8%; median age: 54.3 years, 95%CI: 50.7-57.8) of whom 2774 (65.8%) required ECLS with the majority (92.7%) on V-V ECLS, 4.7% on veno-arterial ECLS and/or Impella, and 2.6% on other ECLS. Acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and cardiac arrest were reported in 7.8%, 9.7%, and 6.6% of patients, respectively. Vasopressors were used in 37.2%. Overall, 3.1% of patients required an ECLS change from V-V ECLS to MCS for heart failure, myocarditis, or myocardial infarction. The median ECLS duration was 15.9 days (95%CI: 13.9-16.3), with an overall survival of 54.6% and 28.1% in V-V ECLS and MCS patients. One study reported 61.1% survival with oxy-right ventricular assist device.
MCS use for cardiocirculatory compromise has been reported in 7.3% of COVID-19 patients requiring ECLS, which is a lower percentage compared to the incidence of any severe cardiocirculatory complication. Based on the poor survival rates, further investigations are warranted to establish the most appropriated indications and timing for MCS in COVID-19.
在多达 25%的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)病例中会发生心肌损伤。虽然静脉-静脉体外生命支持(V-V ECLS)被用作呼吸支持,但对于严重的心脏功能障碍可能需要机械循环支持(MCS)。本系统评价总结了 COVID-19 患者中 MCS 使用率、启动 MCS 的疾病驱动因素以及 MCS 结局的现有文献。
检索了 PubMed/EMBASE 数据库,直到 2021 年 10 月 14 日。纳入接受 COVID-19 体外生命支持的成人患者的文章。主要结局为 MCS 使用率。次要结局包括随访时的死亡率、ECLS 转换率、插管至插管时间、ECLS 时间、心脏疾病、使用正性肌力药和血管加压药。
28 项观察性研究(包括仅接受 ECLS 的人群和作为更大人群一部分的接受 ECLS 的 COVID-19 患者)纳入了 4218 例 COVID-19 患者(女性:28.8%;中位年龄:54.3 岁,95%CI:50.7-57.8),其中 2774 例(65.8%)需要 ECLS 治疗,大多数(92.7%)采用静脉-静脉 ECLS,4.7%采用静脉-动脉 ECLS 和/或 Impella,2.6%采用其他 ECLS。分别有 7.8%、9.7%和 6.6%的患者报告急性心力衰竭、心源性休克和心脏骤停。37.2%的患者使用了血管加压药。总体而言,3.1%的患者需要从静脉-静脉 ECLS 改为 MCS 治疗心力衰竭、心肌炎或心肌梗死。ECLS 中位持续时间为 15.9 天(95%CI:13.9-16.3),静脉-静脉 ECLS 和 MCS 患者的总生存率分别为 54.6%和 28.1%。一项研究报告称,使用 oxy-right 心室辅助装置的生存率为 61.1%。
在需要 ECLS 的 COVID-19 患者中,有 7.3%的患者因心循环衰竭而使用 MCS,这一比例低于任何严重心循环并发症的发生率。基于较差的生存率,需要进一步研究以确定 COVID-19 中 MCS 的最合适适应证和时机。