Suppr超能文献

新冠病毒感染所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征中从单纯静脉-静脉到静脉-动脉及混合体外膜肺氧合配置的转变

Transition from Simple V-V to V-A and Hybrid ECMO Configurations in COVID-19 ARDS.

作者信息

Suwalski Piotr, Staromłyński Jakub, Brączkowski Jakub, Bartczak Maciej, Mariani Silvia, Drobiński Dominik, Szułdrzyński Konstanty, Smoczyński Radosław, Franczyk Marzena, Sarnowski Wojciech, Gajewska Agnieszka, Witkowska Anna, Wierzba Waldemar, Zaczyński Artur, Król Zbigniew, Olek Ewa, Pasierski Michał, Ravaux Justine Mafalda, de Piero Maria Elena, Lorusso Roberto, Kowalewski Mariusz

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Interior, Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland.

Cardio-Thoracic Surgery Department, Heart and Vascular Centre, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Membranes (Basel). 2021 Jun 9;11(6):434. doi: 10.3390/membranes11060434.

Abstract

In SARS-CoV-2 patients with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (V-V ECMO) was shown to provide valuable treatment with reasonable survival in large multi-centre investigations. However, in some patients, conversion to modified ECMO support forms may be needed. In this single-centre retrospective registry, all consecutive patients receiving V-V ECMO between 1 March 2020 to 1 May 2021 were included and analysed. The patient cohort was divided into two groups: those who remained on V-V ECMO and those who required conversion to other modalities. Seventy-eight patients were included, with fourteen cases (18%) requiring conversions to veno-arterial (V-A) or hybrid ECMO. The reasons for the ECMO mode configuration change were inadequate drainage (35.7%), inadequate perfusion (14.3%), myocardial infarction (7.1%), hypovolemic shock (14.3%), cardiogenic shock (14.3%) and septic shock (7.1%). In multivariable analysis, the use of dobutamine ( = 0.007) and a shorter ICU duration ( = 0.047) predicted the conversion. The 30-day mortality was higher in converted patients (log-rank = 0.029). Overall, only 19 patients (24.4%) survived to discharge or lung transplantation. Adverse events were more common after conversion and included renal, cardiovascular and ECMO-circuit complications. Conversion itself was not associated with mortality in the multivariable analysis. In conclusion, as many as 18% of patients undergoing V-V ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS may require conversion to advanced ECMO support.

摘要

在患有严重急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的新型冠状病毒2型(SARS-CoV-2)患者中,在大型多中心研究中,静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(V-V ECMO)被证明能提供有价值的治疗,且患者有合理的生存率。然而,在一些患者中,可能需要转换为改良的ECMO支持形式。在这个单中心回顾性登记研究中,纳入并分析了2020年3月1日至2021年5月1日期间所有连续接受V-V ECMO治疗的患者。患者队列被分为两组:继续接受V-V ECMO治疗的患者和需要转换为其他模式的患者。共纳入78例患者,其中14例(18%)需要转换为静脉-动脉(V-A)或混合ECMO。ECMO模式配置改变的原因包括引流不足(35.7%)、灌注不足(14.3%)、心肌梗死(7.1%)、低血容量性休克(14.3%)、心源性休克(14.3%)和感染性休克(7.1%)。在多变量分析中,使用多巴酚丁胺(P = 0.007)和较短的重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(P = 0.047)可预测转换。转换患者的30天死亡率更高(对数秩检验P = 0.029)。总体而言,只有19例患者(24.4%)存活至出院或接受肺移植。转换后不良事件更常见,包括肾脏、心血管和ECMO回路并发症。在多变量分析中,转换本身与死亡率无关。总之,在因新型冠状病毒肺炎ARDS接受V-V ECMO治疗的患者中,多达18%可能需要转换为高级ECMO支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c0d5/8228471/9fc4bea81c1e/membranes-11-00434-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验