Department of Psychology, 7890Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada.
Meghan A. Richards is now at the Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, Canada.
Psychol Rep. 2022 Apr;125(2):1186-1217. doi: 10.1177/0033294120979696. Epub 2021 Feb 14.
A premenstrual screening tool is needed when time constraints and attrition limit the feasibility of daily ratings. The present study examines the utility of a novel, 33-item, retrospective, dimensional, DSM-5-based, screening measure developed to explore women's perceptions of premenstrual symptomatology. This is the first measure that examines perception of impairment for each DSM-5 symptom and assesses the frequency criterion. Participants (N = 331) reported symptoms ranging from none to a level consistent with a provisional DSM-5 diagnosis of Premenstrual Dysphoric Disorder (PMDD). Initial psychometric properties indicated a five-factor structure: (1) affective symptoms; (2) fatigue, sleep, and anhedonia; (3) symptom frequency; (4) impairment and severity of appetite change and physical symptoms; and (5) difficulty concentrating. The total symptom scale and the frequency, severity, and impairment subscales demonstrated high internal consistency. Strong correlations between this dimensional measure and other retrospective and prospective premenstrual symptom measures suggest strong convergent, concurrent, and predictive validity. Premenstrual symptom groups created using this screening measure (minimal, mild/moderate, severe) differed on other retrospective and prospective measures of premenstrual symptoms. There was evidence of divergent validity and lack of an acquiescence bias. We also report data describing women's perceptions of the frequency, level of impairment, and level of severity for each DSM-5 PMDD symptom over a 12-month period and discuss implications for future research on premenstrual phenomenology. Initial evidence for the reliability and construct validity of this symptom screening measure suggests potential value for assessing premenstrual symptomatology in research and practice.
当时间限制和人员流失限制了日常评估的可行性时,就需要一种经前筛选工具。本研究检验了一种新的、33 项、回顾性、维度性、基于 DSM-5 的筛选工具的效用,该工具旨在探索女性对经前症状的感知。这是第一个检查每个 DSM-5 症状的感知障碍并评估频率标准的测量工具。参与者(N=331)报告的症状范围从无到与经前烦躁障碍(PMDD)的暂定 DSM-5 诊断一致的水平。初步心理测量特性表明存在五因素结构:(1)情感症状;(2)疲劳、睡眠和快感缺失;(3)症状频率;(4)食欲变化和身体症状的损伤和严重程度;以及(5)注意力集中困难。总症状量表以及频率、严重程度和损伤子量表显示出较高的内部一致性。该维度测量与其他回顾性和前瞻性经前症状测量之间的强烈相关性表明具有较强的收敛性、同时性和预测有效性。使用这种筛选测量方法创建的经前症状组(轻度、中度/重度、重度)在其他回顾性和前瞻性经前症状测量上存在差异。存在区分效度和缺乏默许偏差的证据。我们还报告了有关女性在 12 个月期间对每个 DSM-5 PMDD 症状的频率、损伤程度和严重程度的感知的数据,并讨论了对经前现象学未来研究的影响。这种症状筛选测量工具的可靠性和构念效度的初步证据表明,其在研究和实践中评估经前症状学具有潜在价值。