Suppr超能文献

β 僵硬度参数在评估动脉粥样硬化方面有用吗?~ 其临床意义、局限性和未来展望~。

Is Stiffness Parameter β Useful for the Evaluation of Atherosclerosis?~ Its Clinical Implications, Limitations, and Future Perspectives ~.

机构信息

Department of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Molecular Medicine, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine.

Department of Nephrology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine.

出版信息

J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021 May 1;28(5):435-453. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17047. Epub 2021 Feb 13.

Abstract

Atherosclerosis comprises two components, atherosis and sclerosis, characterized by morphological wall thickening and functional stiffening, respectively, of the arterial wall. In recent years, much interest has been directed to the role of functional changes in large arteries, i.e., increased stiffness or decreased elasticity, on the development of cardiovascular diseases. In fact, the clinical evaluation of arterial stiffness is increasingly performed in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Local arterial stiffness is measured using an ultrasound technique implemented with an echo-tracking system at the common carotid and femoral arteries. Several indices of local arterial stiffness are obtained by ultrasound, among which stiffness parameter β is unique because it is the least affected by blood pressure at the time of measurement. Evidence from cross-sectional studies indicates that increased stiffness parameter β is associated with a number of cardiovascular risk factors, such as older age, smoking, insufficient physical activity, hypertension, obesity, metabolic syndrome, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and comorbid cardiovascular disease. Results from several prospective observational studies also suggest that carotid stiffness parameter β is a useful surrogate marker of cardiovascular events and/or mortality, although the results differ depending on the characteristics of the study subjects. Furthermore, several interventional studies have shown that carotid stiffness parameter β improved after lifestyle modification or drug treatment. In this review, we summarize the current evidence of stiffness parameter β of the carotid artery and discuss its clinical implications as a marker of vascular health or as a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes.

摘要

动脉粥样硬化由两个组成部分组成,动脉粥样硬化和硬化,分别以动脉壁的形态壁增厚和功能变硬为特征。近年来,人们对大动脉的功能变化在心血管疾病发展中的作用产生了浓厚的兴趣,即增加僵硬或降低弹性。事实上,在有心血管危险因素的患者中,越来越多地对动脉僵硬进行临床评估。使用回声跟踪系统在颈总动脉和股动脉处的超声技术测量局部动脉僵硬。通过超声获得几种局部动脉僵硬指数,其中僵硬度参数β是独特的,因为它受测量时血压的影响最小。横断面研究的证据表明,僵硬度参数β增加与许多心血管危险因素有关,如年龄较大、吸烟、体力活动不足、高血压、肥胖、代谢综合征、胰岛素抵抗、2 型糖尿病、慢性肾脏病和合并心血管疾病。几项前瞻性观察性研究的结果还表明,颈动脉僵硬度参数β是心血管事件和/或死亡率的有用替代标志物,尽管结果因研究对象的特征而异。此外,几项干预性研究表明,颈动脉僵硬度参数β在生活方式改变或药物治疗后得到改善。在这篇综述中,我们总结了颈动脉僵硬度参数β的当前证据,并讨论了其作为血管健康标志物或心血管结局预测因子的临床意义。

相似文献

2
Local stiffness of the carotid and femoral artery is associated with incident cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality: the Hoorn study.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 May 6;63(17):1739-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.12.041. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
4
Longitudinal effects of a decade of aging on carotid artery stiffness: the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis.
Stroke. 2014 Jan;45(1):48-53. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002649. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
6
[Arterial compliance (stiffness) as a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis].
Herz. 2007 Aug;32(5):379-86. doi: 10.1007/s00059-007-3030-z.
7
Carotid Artery Stiffening With Aging: Structural Versus Load-Dependent Mechanisms in MESA (the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis).
Hypertension. 2022 Jan;79(1):150-158. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18444. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
8
Arterial stiffness, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular risk: Pathophysiologic mechanisms and emerging clinical indications.
Vascul Pharmacol. 2016 Feb;77:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vph.2015.11.083. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
10
Reduced subclinical carotid vascular disease and arterial stiffness in vegetarian men: The CARVOS Study.
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:562-566. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.12.058. Epub 2016 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Implications of Long Sleep Duration on Cardiovascular Health: A Systematic Review.
Cureus. 2025 Jan 20;17(1):e77738. doi: 10.7759/cureus.77738. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Shear Wave Elastography for Carotid Artery Stiffness: Ready for Prime Time?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 27;15(3):303. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15030303.
3
Phonocardiography based pulse wave velocity system for non-occlusive assessment of arterial stiffness.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Jan 23;12:1481836. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1481836. eCollection 2025.
5
Load-dependent mechanisms contribute to increased aortic stiffness among women with a history of preeclampsia: relation with cardiovagal baroreflex sensitivity.
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2024 Dec 1;327(6):H1406-H1412. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00556.2024. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
6
Endothelial Dysfunction in Obesity and Therapeutic Targets.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2024;1460:489-538. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-63657-8_17.
7
Are aortic biomechanical properties early markers of dilatation in patients with Marfan syndrome? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Biomech Model Mechanobiol. 2024 Dec;23(6):2043-2061. doi: 10.1007/s10237-024-01881-z. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
8
Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model.
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):14125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64721-1.
9
Arterial Stiffness and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Jun 17;39(23):e195. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e195.

本文引用的文献

2
Usefulness of Carotid Ultrasonography for Risk Stratification of Cerebral and Cardiovascular Disease.
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020 Oct 1;27(10):1023-1035. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17044. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
3
New Horizons of Arterial Stiffness Developed Using Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI).
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020 Aug 1;27(8):732-748. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17043. Epub 2020 Jun 26.
4
State of the Art Review: Brachial-Ankle PWV.
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020 Jul 1;27(7):621-636. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17041. Epub 2020 May 23.
5
Metabolic Syndrome and Related Factors in Chinese Children and Adolescents: Analysis from a Chinese National Study.
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020 Jun 1;27(6):534-544. doi: 10.5551/jat.50591. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
6
Potential Mechanisms of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitor-Related Cardiovascular Benefits.
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Dec 15;124 Suppl 1:S36-S44. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.10.028.
8
The Risk for Incident Ischemic Heart Disease According to Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate in A Korean Population.
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020 May 1;27(5):461-470. doi: 10.5551/jat.50757. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
10
The Incidence and Associated Factors of Sudden Death in Patients on Hemodialysis: 10-Year Outcome of the Q-Cohort Study.
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2020 Apr 1;27(4):306-318. doi: 10.5551/jat.49833. Epub 2019 Aug 22.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验