• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用心源性休克模型的机械循环支持装置的血液动力学。

Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model.

机构信息

Cooperative Major in Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Joint Graduate School of Tokyo Women's Medical University and Waseda University, Waseda University, 2-2 Wakamatsucho, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 162-8480, Japan.

Division of Cardiology, Mitsui Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):14125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64721-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-64721-1
PMID:38898087
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11187098/
Abstract

Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, including veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella, have been widely used for patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). However, hemodynamics with each device and combination therapy is not thoroughly understood. We aimed to elucidate the hemodynamics with MCS using a pulsatile flow model. Hemodynamics with Impella CP, VA-ECMO, and a combination of Impella CP and VA-ECMO were assessed based on the pressure and flow under support with each device and the pressure-volume loop of the ventricle model. The Impella CP device with CS status resulted in an increase in aortic pressure and a decrease in end-diastolic volume and end-diastolic pressure (EDP). VA-ECMO support resulted in increased afterload, leading to a significant increase in aortic pressure with an increase in end-systolic volume and EDP and decreasing venous reservoir pressure. The combination of Impella CP and VA-ECMO led to left ventricular unloading, regardless of increase in afterload. Hemodynamic support with Impella and VA-ECMO should be a promising combination for patients with severe CS.

摘要

机械循环支持(MCS)装置,包括静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)和 Impella,已广泛用于治疗心源性休克(CS)患者。然而,每种设备和联合治疗的血流动力学并不完全清楚。我们旨在使用脉动流模型阐明 MCS 的血流动力学。根据每种设备的支持压力和流量以及心室模型的压力-容积环,评估 Impella CP、VA-ECMO 和 Impella CP 和 VA-ECMO 联合治疗的血流动力学。CS 状态下的 Impella CP 装置导致主动脉压升高,舒张末期容积和舒张末期压(EDP)降低。VA-ECMO 支持导致后负荷增加,导致主动脉压显著升高,同时收缩末期容积和 EDP 增加,静脉储压器压力降低。Impella CP 和 VA-ECMO 的联合使用导致左心室卸载,而不增加后负荷。Impella 和 VA-ECMO 的血流动力学支持可能是严重 CS 患者的一种有前途的联合治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/f00fe03e365a/41598_2024_64721_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/a85e0c809e5d/41598_2024_64721_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/f91f561ba826/41598_2024_64721_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/8b9162832918/41598_2024_64721_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/fa9f165480e0/41598_2024_64721_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/f00fe03e365a/41598_2024_64721_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/a85e0c809e5d/41598_2024_64721_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/f91f561ba826/41598_2024_64721_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/8b9162832918/41598_2024_64721_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/fa9f165480e0/41598_2024_64721_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/581f/11187098/f00fe03e365a/41598_2024_64721_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Hemodynamics with mechanical circulatory support devices using a cardiogenic shock model.使用心源性休克模型的机械循环支持装置的血液动力学。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jun 19;14(1):14125. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-64721-1.
2
Impella CP or VA-ECMO in profound cardiogenic shock: left ventricular unloading and organ perfusion in a large animal model.Impella CP 或 VA-ECMO 在严重心源性休克中的应用:大型动物模型中的左心室卸载和器官灌注。
EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 8;14(15):e1585-e1592. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-18-00684.
3
Haemodynamic implications of VA-ECMO vs. VA-ECMO plus Impella CP for cardiogenic shock in a large animal model.VA-ECMO 与 VA-ECMO 加 Impella CP 在大型动物模型中心源性休克中的血液动力学影响。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Aug;11(4):2305-2313. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14780. Epub 2024 Apr 22.
4
Concomitant implantation of Impella on top of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve survival of patients with cardiogenic shock.在静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合(VA-ECMO)的基础上同时植入 Impella 可能会提高心源性休克患者的生存率。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;19(3):404-412. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.668. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
5
Increasing use of the Impella®-pump in severe cardiogenic shock: a word of caution.在严重心源性休克中越来越多地使用Impella®泵:一则警示
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020 May 1;30(5):711-714. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivaa015.
6
Cardiogenic shock with highly complicated course after influenza A virus infection treated with vva-ECMO and Impella CP (ECMELLA): a case report.甲型流感病毒感染后出现高度复杂病程的心源性休克,使用 VA-ECMO 和 Impella CP(ECMELLA)治疗:一例报告。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Nov 8;21(1):528. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02346-2.
7
Survival after refractory cardiogenic shock is comparable in patients with Impella and veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation when adjusted for SAVE score.在调整 SAVE 评分后,对于难治性心源性休克患者,使用 Impella 和静脉-动脉体外膜肺氧合治疗后的存活率相当。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2019 Jun;8(4):329-337. doi: 10.1177/2048872618799745. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
8
Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal life support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: surgical venting versus Impella device.体外生命支持治疗心肌梗死后合并心源性休克时的左心室卸载:外科排气与 Impella 装置。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2022 Jan 6;34(1):137-144. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab230. Epub 2021 Aug 15.
9
The Rise of Endovascular Mechanical Circulatory Support Use for Cardiogenic Shock and High Risk Coronary Intervention: Considerations and Challenges.血管内机械循环支持在心原性休克和高危冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用日益增加:考虑因素和挑战。
Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2021 Feb;19(2):151-164. doi: 10.1080/14779072.2021.1863147. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
10
Early Escalation of Mechanical Circulatory Support Stabilizes and Potentially Rescues Patients in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.早期应用机械循环支持稳定并可能挽救难治性心源性休克患者。
Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Mar;13(3):e005853. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.118.005853. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of changes in arterial blood pressure and cardiac output during cardiogenic shock development in a porcine model.猪模型中心源性休克发展过程中动脉血压和心输出量变化的比较。
Intensive Care Med Exp. 2025 Sep 1;13(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40635-025-00802-3.
2
Impact of lactate levels on admission in STEMI patients with cardiogenic shock treated with IMPELLA.乳酸水平对接受Impella治疗的ST段抬高型心肌梗死伴心源性休克患者入院时的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.1007/s00380-025-02516-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Invasive Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克的有创治疗:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
Circulation. 2021 Apr 13;143(15):e815-e829. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000959. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
2
Is Stiffness Parameter β Useful for the Evaluation of Atherosclerosis?~ Its Clinical Implications, Limitations, and Future Perspectives ~.β 僵硬度参数在评估动脉粥样硬化方面有用吗?~ 其临床意义、局限性和未来展望~。
J Atheroscler Thromb. 2021 May 1;28(5):435-453. doi: 10.5551/jat.RV17047. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
3
Defining Shock and Preshock for Mortality Risk Stratification in Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.
定义休克和休克前状态,以对心脏重症监护病房患者进行死亡率风险分层。
Circ Heart Fail. 2021 Jan;14(1):e007678. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007678. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
4
Left Ventricular Unloading Is Associated With Lower Mortality in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock Treated With Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Results From an International, Multicenter Cohort Study.左心室卸载与使用体外膜肺氧合治疗的心源性休克患者的死亡率降低相关:一项国际多中心队列研究的结果。
Circulation. 2020 Dec;142(22):2095-2106. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.048792. Epub 2020 Oct 9.
5
Cardiogenic Shock Classification to Predict Mortality in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.心原性休克分类预测心脏重症监护病房死亡率。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Oct 29;74(17):2117-2128. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.07.077. Epub 2019 Sep 20.
6
Management of cardiogenic shock complicating myocardial infarction: an update 2019.心肌梗死并发心源性休克的治疗:2019 年更新
Eur Heart J. 2019 Aug 21;40(32):2671-2683. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz363.
7
Intraaortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction: Long-Term 6-Year Outcome of the Randomized IABP-SHOCK II Trial.主动脉内球囊反搏治疗急性心肌梗死并发心源性休克:随机对照IABP-SHOCK II试验的6年长期结果
Circulation. 2019 Jan 15;139(3):395-403. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.038201. Epub 2018 Nov 11.
8
Left Ventricular Unloading Before Reperfusion Promotes Functional Recovery After Acute Myocardial Infarction.左心室在再灌注前卸载可促进急性心肌梗死后的功能恢复。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 31;72(5):501-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.05.034.
9
Left Ventricular Mechanical Unloading by Total Support of Impella in Myocardial Infarction Reduces Infarct Size, Preserves Left Ventricular Function, and Prevents Subsequent Heart Failure in Dogs.左心室机械性卸载通过全支持 Impella 在心肌梗死中减少梗死面积,保留左心室功能,并预防犬随后发生心力衰竭。
Circ Heart Fail. 2018 May;11(5):e004397. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.117.004397.
10
Quantitative assessment of paravalvular leakage after transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a patient-specific pulsatile flow model.使用患者特定脉动流模型定量评估经导管主动脉瓣置换术后瓣周漏。
Int J Cardiol. 2018 May 1;258:313-320. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.11.106.