• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版和第三版修订本中的人格障碍:趋同性、涵盖范围及内部一致性

Personality disorders in DSM-III and DSM-III-R: convergence, coverage, and internal consistency.

作者信息

Morey L C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37240.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 1988 May;145(5):573-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.5.573.

DOI:10.1176/ajp.145.5.573
PMID:3358461
Abstract

Although many sections of DSM-III-R reflect few changes from DSM-III, the diagnostic criteria for the personality disorders involve more substantial revisions. This study examined the impact of DSM-III-R revisions in terms of convergence with DSM-III, the diagnostic coverage of patients with personality disorders, and the internal consistency of the personality disorder criteria sets. The results demonstrated a substantial divergence between DSM-III and DSM-III-R diagnoses, increased coverage accompanied by a large increase in overlap among personality disorders, and internal consistency estimates of DSM-III-R criterion sets comparable to those in DSM-III.

摘要

尽管《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)的许多章节与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)相比变化不大,但人格障碍的诊断标准却有更实质性的修订。本研究从与DSM-III的一致性、人格障碍患者的诊断覆盖范围以及人格障碍标准集的内部一致性等方面,考察了DSM-III-R修订的影响。结果表明,DSM-III与DSM-III-R的诊断之间存在很大差异,覆盖范围增加,同时人格障碍之间的重叠大幅增加,且DSM-III-R标准集的内部一致性估计与DSM-III中的相当。

相似文献

1
Personality disorders in DSM-III and DSM-III-R: convergence, coverage, and internal consistency.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版和第三版修订本中的人格障碍:趋同性、涵盖范围及内部一致性
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 May;145(5):573-7. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.5.573.
2
The internal consistency and factorial structure of behaviors judged to be associated with DSM-III personality disorders.
Am J Psychiatry. 1986 Nov;143(11):1473-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.143.11.1473.
3
Covariation of criteria sets for avoidant, schizoid, and dependent personality disorders.回避型、分裂样和依赖型人格障碍的标准集的共变。
Am J Psychiatry. 1987 Jun;144(6):767-71. doi: 10.1176/ajp.144.6.767.
4
The DSM-III-R personality disorders: an overview.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本中的人格障碍:概述
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Jul;145(7):786-95. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.7.786.
5
Psychometric characteristics of the cluster B personality disorders under DSM-III-R and DSM-IV.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)和第四版(DSM-IV)中B类人格障碍的心理测量特征。
J Pers Disord. 1997 Fall;11(3):270-8. doi: 10.1521/pedi.1997.11.3.270.
6
Validating structured DSM-III-R personality disorder assessments with longitudinal data.利用纵向数据验证结构化的《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)人格障碍评估
Am J Psychiatry. 1988 Oct;145(10):1297-9. doi: 10.1176/ajp.145.10.1297.
7
The convergent and discriminant validity of the MCMI as a measure of the DSM-III personality disorders.作为《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)人格障碍测量工具的米隆临床多轴问卷(MCMI)的收敛效度和区分效度。
J Pers Assess. 1987 Summer;51(2):228-42. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5102_7.
8
Prototypicality ratings of DSM-III criteria for personality disorders.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版人格障碍标准的典型性评分
J Nerv Ment Dis. 1987 Jul;175(7):395-401. doi: 10.1097/00005053-198707000-00002.
9
Convergence between DSM-IV-TR and DSM-5 diagnostic models for personality disorder: evaluation of strategies for establishing diagnostic thresholds.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版修订版(DSM-IV-TR)与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)人格障碍诊断模型之间的趋同:建立诊断阈值策略的评估
J Psychiatr Pract. 2013 May;19(3):179-93. doi: 10.1097/01.pra.0000430502.78833.06.
10
The face validity of the DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria sets for borderline personality disorder.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版(DSM-III)及第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)中边缘型人格障碍标准集的表面效度。
Am J Psychiatry. 1991 Jul;148(7):870-4. doi: 10.1176/ajp.148.7.870.

引用本文的文献

1
Frequency of narcissistic personality disorder in a counseling center population in China.中国咨询中心人群中自恋型人格障碍的频率。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 5;19(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2185-5.
2
Mistrustful and Misunderstood: A Review of Paranoid Personality Disorder.多疑与误解:偏执型人格障碍综述
Curr Behav Neurosci Rep. 2017 Jun;4(2):151-165. doi: 10.1007/s40473-017-0116-7. Epub 2017 May 18.
3
Personality disorders in DSM-5: emerging research on the alternative model.DSM-5 中的人格障碍:替代模型的新兴研究。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2015 Apr;17(4):558. doi: 10.1007/s11920-015-0558-0.
4
Personality disorder classification: stuck in neutral, how to move forward?人格障碍分类:停滞不前,如何前行?
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014 Oct;16(10):480. doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0480-x.
5
Narcissistic personality disorder: an integrative review of recent empirical data and current definitions.自恋型人格障碍:近期实证数据和现行定义的综合述评。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2014 May;16(5):445. doi: 10.1007/s11920-014-0445-0.
6
The brief self-control scale predicts jail inmates' recidivism, substance dependence, and post-release adjustment.简易自我控制量表可预测监狱服刑人员的累犯、药物依赖及出狱后的适应情况。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;40(3):334-47. doi: 10.1177/0146167213511666. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
7
Frequency of borderline personality disorder among psychiatric outpatients in Shanghai.上海精神科门诊患者中边缘型人格障碍的频率。
J Pers Disord. 2012 Jun;26(3):393-401. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.3.393.
8
A comparison of passive-aggressive and negativistic personality disorders.被动攻击型人格障碍与消极抵抗型人格障碍的比较。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(3):296-303. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.655819. Epub 2012 Feb 13.
9
Construct validation theory applied to the study of personality dysfunction.结构效度理论在人格障碍研究中的应用。
J Pers. 2012 Dec;80(6):1507-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00772.x.
10
DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders.DSM-5 人格特质与 DSM-IV 人格障碍。
J Abnorm Psychol. 2012 May;121(2):424-32. doi: 10.1037/a0026656. Epub 2012 Jan 16.