Jeon Ye Won, Lim Seung Taek, Gwak Hongki, Park Seon Young, Shin Juhee, Han Hye Sug, Suh Young Jin
Department of Surgery, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Korea.
Department of Nursing, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Korea.
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2021 Feb;100(2):59-66. doi: 10.4174/astr.2021.100.2.59. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
Treatment with 4 cycles of docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (TC) in the adjuvant setting is associated with better outcomes than treatment with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). However, Western guidelines have indicated that TC confers a high risk (>20%) of febrile neutropenia (FN), while AC confers an intermediate risk (10%-20%) of FN. Threrefore, we evaluated the incidence of FN and the clinical utilization of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis after adjuvant TC chemotherapy.
We categorized 201 patients who received adjuvant TC chemotherapy into 3 groups according to the method of prophylaxis and compared neutropenic events, other adverse events, and hospital care costs in the 3 groups.
The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia decreased from 93.0% in patients without prophylaxis to 82.4% in those who received secondary prophylaxis and 16.7% in those who received primary prophylaxis. Although the incidence of FN was not different between patients without prophylaxis and patients who received secondary prophylaxis (15.7% and 14.9%), none of the patients who received primary prophylaxis developed FN. Moreover, a decrease in neutropenic events resulted in a significant decrease in the mean duration of neutropenia (2.50 days to 0.08 days, P < 0.001), the risk of hospitalization (29.8% to 2.2%, P < 0.001), and the mean total hospital care cost for all chemotherapy cycles (790.80 to 486.00 US dollars, P < 0.001).
The use of pegfilgrastim prophylaxis during adjuvant TC chemotherapy is associated with significant decreases in the incidence of neutropenic events, hospitalization, and hospital care cost compared to those seen in patients without prophylaxis.
在辅助治疗中,与多柔比星和环磷酰胺(AC)治疗相比,多西他赛和环磷酰胺(TC)4周期治疗具有更好的疗效。然而,西方指南指出,TC导致发热性中性粒细胞减少(FN)的风险较高(>20%),而AC导致FN的风险中等(10%-20%)。因此,我们评估了辅助性TC化疗后FN的发生率以及聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子预防性治疗的临床应用情况。
我们根据预防性治疗方法将201例接受辅助性TC化疗的患者分为3组,并比较了3组中的中性粒细胞减少事件、其他不良事件和住院护理费用。
4级中性粒细胞减少的发生率从未进行预防性治疗的患者中的93.0%降至接受二级预防性治疗的患者中的82.4%,以及接受一级预防性治疗的患者中的16.7%。虽然未进行预防性治疗的患者和接受二级预防性治疗的患者之间FN的发生率没有差异(分别为15.7%和14.9%),但接受一级预防性治疗的患者均未发生FN。此外,中性粒细胞减少事件的减少导致中性粒细胞减少的平均持续时间显著缩短(从2.50天降至0.08天,P<0.001),住院风险降低(从29.8%降至2.2%,P<0.001),以及所有化疗周期的平均总住院护理费用降低(从790.80美元降至486.00美元,P<0.001)。
与未进行预防性治疗的患者相比,辅助性TC化疗期间使用聚乙二醇化重组人粒细胞刺激因子预防性治疗可使中性粒细胞减少事件的发生率、住院率和住院护理费用显著降低。