Suppr超能文献

奥沙利铂联合不同剂量氟尿嘧啶方案用于结直肠癌辅助化疗的多中心研究。

The comparison of FOLFOX regimens with different doses of 5-FU for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer: a multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Adiyaman Training and Research Hospital, 02100, Adiyaman, Turkey.

Department of Medical Oncology, Dicle University Faculty of Medicine, Diyarbakır, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Jun;36(6):1311-1319. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03888-9. Epub 2021 Feb 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We aim to compare the efficiency and toxicity of three different 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administration types in 5-FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) combination treatment for adjuvant therapy in colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Five hundred and seventy patients with stage III colorectal carcinoma who received different FOLFOX regimens after curative resection were included. Patients were divided into three groups as FOLFOX-4, modified FOLFOX-6 (mFOLFOX-6), and mFOLFOX-4 for comparison of toxicity and disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) times.

RESULTS

Three-year DFS rates for FOLFOX-4, mFOLFOX-6, and mFOLFOX-4 groups were 65%, 72%, and 72%, respectively. Five-year OS rates for FOLFOX-4, mFOLFOX-6, and mFOLFOX-4 groups were 69%, 75%, and 67%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the three treatment groups in terms of DFS and OS (p = 0.079, and p = 0.147, respectively). Among grade 1-2 adverse events (AE), thrombocytopenia, neuropathy, and stomatitis were more common in the mFOLFOX-6-treated group. The frequency of grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting were similar in mFOLFOX-6 (36.3% and 24%, respectively) and mFOLFOX-4 (32.4% and 24.7%, respectively) groups but were higher than that in the FOLFOX-4 (19.5% and 11.3%, respectively) group. Among the most common grade 3-4 AE, neutropenia (53.4%, 9%, and 13.5%, respectively) and diarrhea (10.5%, 2.2%, and 2.4, respectively) were more common in FOLFOX-4. The rate of anemia and febrile neutropenia was similar in treatment groups (p = 0.063, and p = 0.210, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In the adjuvant treatment of stage III CRC patients, three different 5-FU administration types in FOLFOX combination treatment can be used with similar efficiency and manageable toxicity.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较三种不同氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)给药方式在结直肠癌(CRC)辅助治疗中奥沙利铂、亚叶酸钙和氟尿嘧啶(FOLFOX)联合方案中的疗效和毒性。

方法

本研究共纳入 570 例接受不同 FOLFOX 方案根治性切除术的 III 期结直肠癌患者。将患者分为 FOLFOX-4、改良 FOLFOX-6(mFOLFOX-6)和 mFOLFOX-4 三组,比较毒性和无病生存(DFS)及总生存(OS)时间。

结果

FOLFOX-4、mFOLFOX-6 和 mFOLFOX-4 组的 3 年 DFS 率分别为 65%、72%和 72%。FOLFOX-4、mFOLFOX-6 和 mFOLFOX-4 组的 5 年 OS 率分别为 69%、75%和 67%。三组间 DFS 和 OS 差异无统计学意义(p = 0.079 和 p = 0.147)。在 1-2 级不良事件(AE)中,血小板减少症、周围神经病变和口腔炎在 mFOLFOX-6 组更常见。mFOLFOX-6(36.3%和 24%)和 mFOLFOX-4(32.4%和 24.7%)组的 1-2 级恶心呕吐发生率相似,但高于 FOLFOX-4 组(19.5%和 11.3%)。在最常见的 3-4 级 AE 中,中性粒细胞减少症(53.4%、9%和 13.5%)和腹泻(10.5%、2.2%和 2.4%)在 FOLFOX-4 组更常见。各组贫血和发热性中性粒细胞减少症发生率相似(p = 0.063 和 p = 0.210)。

结论

在 III 期 CRC 患者的辅助治疗中,FOLFOX 联合方案中三种不同氟尿嘧啶给药方式的疗效相当,毒性可耐受。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验