Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington School of Medicine, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Box 357120, Seattle, WA, 98195-7120, USA.
Department of Philosophy and African Centre for Philosophy of Science & Epistemology, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa.
Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Feb 15;43(1):24. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00377-8.
This paper argues that we can see our lives as a snapshot happening now or as a moving picture extending across time. These dual ways of seeing our lives inform how we conceive of the problem of age group justice. A snapshot view sees age group justice as an interpersonal problem between distinct age groups. A moving picture view sees age group justice as a first-person problem of prudential choice. This paper explores these different ways of thinking about age group justice and illustrates them using a principle of respect for human dignity, understood in terms of reasonable support for floor level central human capabilities at each stage of life. I argue that different frames are suitable for different kinds of decisions, and each provides a true, but partial, picture of aging and age group justice.
本文认为,我们可以将自己的生活视为一个现在发生的静态快照,也可以将其视为一个跨越时间的动态画面。这两种看待生活的方式影响了我们对年龄群体正义问题的看法。静态快照的观点将年龄群体正义视为不同年龄群体之间的人际问题。动态画面的观点则将年龄群体正义视为个人的审慎选择问题。本文探讨了这些不同的思考年龄群体正义的方式,并使用尊重人类尊严的原则来说明它们,将其理解为在生命的每个阶段为基本的核心人类能力提供合理支持。我认为,不同的框架适用于不同类型的决策,并且每个框架都提供了一个关于衰老和年龄群体正义的真实但片面的画面。