Suppr超能文献

梅达沃和汉密尔顿论衰老进化中的选择力量。

Medawar and Hamilton on the selective forces in the evolution of ageing.

机构信息

Department of Evolutionary Theory, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Biology, August-Thienemann-Straße 2, Plön, 24306, Germany.

出版信息

Hist Philos Life Sci. 2021 Nov 25;43(4):124. doi: 10.1007/s40656-021-00476-6.

Abstract

Both Medawar and Hamilton contributed key ideas to the modern evolutionary theory of ageing. In particular, they both suggested that, in populations with overlapping generations, the force with which selection acts on traits declines with the age at which traits are expressed. This decline would eventually cause ageing to evolve. However, the biological literature diverges on the relationship between Medawar's analysis of the force of selection and Hamilton's. Some authors appear to believe that Hamilton perfected Medawar's insightful, yet ultimately erroneous analysis of this force, while others see Hamilton's analysis as a coherent development of, or the obvious complement to Medawar's. Here, the relationship between the two analyses is revisited. Two things are argued for. First, most of Medawar's alleged errors that Hamilton would had rectified seem not to be there. The origin of these perceived errors appears to be in a misinterpretation of Medawar's writings. Second, the mathematics of Medawar and that of Hamilton show a significant overlap. However, different meanings are attached to the same mathematical expression. Medawar put forth an expression for the selective force on age-specific fitness. Hamilton proposed a full spectrum of selective forces each operating on age-specific fitness components, i.e. mortality and fertility. One of Hamilton's expressions, possibly his most important, is of the same form as Medawar's expression. But Hamilton's selective forces on age-specific fitness components do not add up to yield Medawar's selective force on age-specific fitness. It is concluded that Hamilton's analysis should be considered neither as a correction to Medawar's analysis nor as its obvious complement.

摘要

梅达沃和汉密尔顿都为现代进化衰老理论贡献了重要思想。特别是,他们都认为,在世代重叠的种群中,选择对特征的作用力随着特征表现的年龄而下降。这种下降最终将导致衰老进化。然而,生物学文献在梅达沃对选择力的分析与汉密尔顿的分析之间存在分歧。一些作者似乎认为,汉密尔顿完善了梅达沃对这种力量的有见地但最终错误的分析,而另一些作者则认为汉密尔顿的分析是对梅达沃的分析的连贯发展或明显补充。在这里,重新审视了这两种分析之间的关系。有两点论据。首先,汉密尔顿本应纠正的梅达沃的大部分所谓错误似乎并不存在。这些被认为的错误的根源似乎在于对梅达沃著作的误解。其次,梅达沃和汉密尔顿的数学有很大的重叠。然而,同一个数学表达式被赋予了不同的含义。梅达沃提出了一个用于特定年龄适应性的选择力的表达式。汉密尔顿提出了一系列完整的选择力,每个选择力都作用于特定年龄的适应性成分,即死亡率和生育率。汉密尔顿的一个表达式,可能是他最重要的表达式,与梅达沃的表达式形式相同。但是汉密尔顿对特定年龄适应性成分的选择力并没有加起来得到梅达沃对特定年龄适应性的选择力。因此得出结论,汉密尔顿的分析不应被视为对梅达沃的分析的修正,也不应被视为其明显的补充。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45fb/8616860/6029d6c809eb/40656_2021_476_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验