Université Clermont Auvergne, CROC, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Odontologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
J Texture Stud. 2021 Jun;52(3):278-293. doi: 10.1111/jtxs.12591. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Xersotomia is associated with food avoidance and low nutritional assessment. This review seeks to document whether products called "saliva substitutes" or "artificial saliva" can really replace saliva in food oral processing. Pubmed and Science Direct were searched for articles using the keywords "saliva substitutes" and "artificial saliva." An advanced search was applied using the terms "xerostomia" and/or "food oral processing" and/or "eating" and/or "mastication" and/or "chewing" and/or "swallowing." The analysis methods and the inclusion criteria were documented in a protocol published in the International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO with the registration number CRD42019124585). The search included 43 articles, published between 1979 and 2017. Among the included studies, 17 were observational studies, 5 were pilot studies, 21 were crossover studies, and 14 of these studies were blinded. The Strobe score for the included articles varied from 7.5 to 20. The possible effects of the use of saliva substitutes on the ingestion function were poorly investigated. No evidence was based on physiological studies. It is unknown whether using a saliva substitute has an effect on the composition and rheological properties of the food bolus, on the lubrication of the oral and laryngeal mucosa or on both phenomena. Moreover, saliva substitutes were not formulated to improve food oral processing and most of them are flavored. New saliva substitutes and artificial saliva should be designed and formulated to improve food oral processing.
口干与食物回避和营养评估低有关。本综述旨在记录所谓的“唾液替代品”或“人工唾液”是否真的可以替代食物口腔加工中的唾液。在 PubMed 和 Science Direct 上使用关键词“唾液替代品”和“人工唾液”搜索文章。使用术语“口干”和/或“食物口腔加工”和/或“进食”和/或“咀嚼”和/或“吞咽”应用高级搜索。分析方法和纳入标准记录在国际前瞻性系统评价注册(PROSPERO,注册号 CRD42019124585)中发布的方案中。搜索包括 1979 年至 2017 年期间发表的 43 篇文章。在纳入的研究中,17 项为观察性研究,5 项为试点研究,21 项为交叉研究,其中 14 项为盲法研究。纳入文章的 Strobe 评分从 7.5 到 20 不等。使用唾液替代品对口咽功能的可能影响研究甚少。没有基于生理学研究的证据。目前尚不清楚使用唾液替代品是否会影响食物团块的组成和流变特性、口腔和喉部黏膜的润滑或这两种现象。此外,唾液替代品的设计并非为了改善食物口腔加工,而且大多数都有味道。应该设计和配制新的唾液替代品和人工唾液以改善食物口腔加工。