• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将疾病领域和作用模式作为分配默认职业接触限值的标准。

Disease area and mode of action as criteria to assign a default occupational exposure limit.

机构信息

Novartis Pharma AG, Novartis Business Services, Postfach, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland.

Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, USA; Roche Innovation Center Zurich, Wagistrasse 10, CH-8952, Schlieren, Switzerland.

出版信息

Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Jun;122:104891. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104891. Epub 2021 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104891
PMID:33587935
Abstract

In the early stages of drug research and development, there are only a few or no toxicological data available for newly synthesized small molecule drug candidates (DC). Calculation of the DC's occupational exposure limit (OEL) without toxicological data is not possible. Nevertheless, an OEL is needed to indicate the level of protection required to minimize risks for laboratory researchers and technicians. For this reason, simplified guidance is required to predict possible health hazards of DCs and their corresponding safe inhalation exposure levels. Here, we evaluated 860 drug substances (DS) with OELs calculated by Novartis and grouped the DSs by disease area (DA) and then their mode of action (MoA). 28% of the evaluated DSs (n = 242) had an OEL <10 μg/m and 72% (n = 618) had an OEL ≥10 μg/m. Our evaluation confirms that in the absence of any compound-specific data, the default OEL of 10 μg/m is a reasonably safe exposure limit for small molecule DCs. Furthermore, our analysis suggests certain DAs and MoAs as valid criteria that may be integrated into a company's specific strategy for the assessment of data-poor compounds in order to identify DCs in an early stage of their development which require a default OEL <10 μg/m.

摘要

在药物研发的早期阶段,新合成的小分子药物候选物(DC)可能只有很少或没有毒理学数据。没有毒理学数据,就不可能计算 DC 的职业接触限值(OEL)。然而,需要有一个 OEL 来表示为将实验室研究人员和技术人员的风险降到最低所需的保护水平。出于这个原因,需要简化指导来预测 DC 可能存在的健康危害及其相应的安全吸入暴露水平。在这里,我们评估了诺华计算出 OEL 的 860 种药物物质(DS),并按疾病领域(DA)对 DS 进行分组,然后按作用方式(MoA)进行分组。评估的 DS 中有 28%(n=242)的 OEL<10μg/m,72%(n=618)的 OEL≥10μg/m。我们的评估证实,在没有任何特定化合物数据的情况下,默认的 10μg/m 的 OEL 是小分子 DC 合理的安全暴露限值。此外,我们的分析表明,某些 DA 和 MoA 可以作为有效的标准,可能会被纳入公司特定的策略中,以评估数据匮乏的化合物,以便在药物开发的早期阶段识别出需要默认 OEL<10μg/m 的 DC。

相似文献

1
Disease area and mode of action as criteria to assign a default occupational exposure limit.将疾病领域和作用模式作为分配默认职业接触限值的标准。
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2021 Jun;122:104891. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2021.104891. Epub 2021 Feb 12.
2
Setting Occupational Exposure Limits for Genotoxic Substances in the Pharmaceutical Industry.设定制药行业中遗传毒性物质的职业接触限值。
Toxicol Sci. 2016 May;151(1):2-9. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfw028.
3
Derived no-effect levels (DNELs) under the European chemicals regulation REACH--an analysis of long-term inhalation worker-DNELs presented by industry.欧洲化学品管理法规REACH下的推导无效应水平(DNELs)——对企业提交的长期吸入性职业DNELs的分析
Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 May;59(4):416-38. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/meu103. Epub 2014 Dec 2.
4
Modes of action considerations in threshold expectations for health effects of benzene.阈效预期中苯健康效应作用模式的考虑因素。
Toxicol Lett. 2020 Nov 1;334:78-86. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2020.09.005. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
5
Use of the benchmark-dose (BMD) approach to derive occupational exposure limits (OELs) for genotoxic carcinogens: N-nitrosamines.应用基准剂量(BMD)方法推导遗传毒性致癌物的职业接触限值(OEL):亚硝胺。
J Appl Toxicol. 2023 Aug;43(8):1183-1200. doi: 10.1002/jat.4455. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
6
Misinterpretation and misuse of exposure limits.暴露限值的误解与误用。
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001 Feb;16(2):251-6. doi: 10.1080/10473220118280.
7
Derivation of occupational exposure limits: Differences in methods and protection levels.职业接触限值的推导:方法和防护水平的差异。
J Appl Toxicol. 2022 May;42(5):913-926. doi: 10.1002/jat.4307. Epub 2022 Mar 13.
8
Application of a framework for the selection of an appropriate occupational exposure limit for manganese.用于选择锰的适当职业接触限值的框架的应用。
Neurotoxicology. 2017 Jan;58:249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2016.09.014. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
9
Testing the coherence between occupational exposure limits for inhalation and their biological limit values with a generalized PBPK-model: the case of 2-propanol and acetone.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014 Aug;69(3):408-15. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 20.
10
Occupational exposure limits for manufactured nanomaterials, a systematic review.人造纳米材料的职业接触限值:一项系统综述
Nanotoxicology. 2017 Feb;11(1):7-19. doi: 10.1080/17435390.2016.1262920. Epub 2017 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
An Investigation on the Relationship between Dust Emission and Air Flow as Well as Particle Size with a Novel Containment Two-Chamber Setup.采用新型密闭双室装置对粉尘排放与气流及粒径之间关系的研究。
Pharmaceutics. 2024 Aug 20;16(8):1088. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics16081088.