Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Psychiatry, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands & GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Research and Innovation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; GGZ inGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Research and Innovation, Oldenaller 1, 1081 HJ Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Leiden University, Leiden University Medical Centre, Department of Psychiatry, Leiden, the Netherlands.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Apr 1;284:85-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
Comorbidity of depressive and anxiety disorders is common and remains incompletely comprehended. This paper summarizes findings from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) regarding prevalence, temporal sequence, course and longitudinal patterns; sociodemographic, vulnerability and neurobiological indicators; and functional, somatic and mental health indicators of comorbidity.
Narrative synthesis of earlier NESDA based papers on comorbidity (n=76).
Comorbidity was the rule in over three-quarter of subjects with depressive and/or anxiety disorders, most often preceded by an anxiety disorder. Higher severity and chronicity characterized a poorer comorbidity course. Over time, transitions between depressive and anxiety disorders were common. Consistent comorbidity risk indicators in subjects with depressive and anxiety disorders were childhood trauma, neuroticism and early age of onset. Psychological vulnerabilities, such as trait avoidance tendencies, were more pronounced in comorbid than in single disorders. In general, there were few differences in biological markers and neuroimaging findings between persons with comorbid versus single disorders. Most functional, somatic, and other mental health indicators, ranging from disability to cardiovascular and psychiatric multimorbidity, were highest in comorbid disorders.
The observational design of NESDA limits causal inference. Attrition was higher in comorbid relative to single disorders.
As compared to single disorders, persons with comorbid depressive and anxiety disorders were characterized by more psychosocial risk determinants, more somatic and other psychiatric morbidities, more functional impairments, and poorer outcome. These results justify specific attention for comorbidity of depressive and anxiety disorders, particularly in treatment settings.
抑郁障碍和焦虑障碍共病较为常见,但仍不完全被理解。本文总结了荷兰抑郁和焦虑研究(NESDA)中关于共病的患病率、时间顺序、病程和纵向模式;社会人口学、易感性和神经生物学指标;以及功能、躯体和精神健康共病指标的发现。
对基于 NESDA 的先前共病论文进行叙述性综合(n=76)。
在超过四分之三的抑郁和/或焦虑障碍患者中,共病是常见的,大多数情况下先出现焦虑障碍。严重程度和慢性程度较高的患者共病病程较差。随着时间的推移,抑郁和焦虑障碍之间的转换较为常见。在抑郁和焦虑障碍患者中,一致的共病风险指标包括儿童期创伤、神经质和发病年龄较早。心理脆弱性,如特质回避倾向,在共病中比在单一疾病中更为明显。一般来说,在共病和单一疾病患者之间,生物标志物和神经影像学发现差异较小。大多数功能、躯体和其他精神健康指标,从残疾到心血管和精神科多种共病,在共病障碍中最高。
NESDA 的观察性设计限制了因果推断。与单一疾病相比,共病患者的辍学率更高。
与单一疾病相比,共患抑郁和焦虑障碍的患者具有更多的心理社会风险决定因素、更多的躯体和其他精神疾病、更多的功能障碍和更差的预后。这些结果证明了对抑郁和焦虑障碍共病的特别关注,特别是在治疗环境中。