• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

财务脆弱性与工人福祉:长期服务和支持工作者与其他卫生工作者的比较。

Financial Vulnerability and Worker Well-Being: A Comparison of Long-Term Services and Supports Workers With Other Health Workers.

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Oct;78(5):607-615. doi: 10.1177/1077558720930131. Epub 2020 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1177/1077558720930131
PMID:32567500
Abstract

Over 1.5 million new jobs need to be filled by 2026 for medical assistants, nursing aides, and home care aides, many of which will work in the long-term services and supports (LTSS) sector. Using 16 years of data from the American Time Use Survey, we examined the financial vulnerability of high-skill and low-skill LTSS workers in comparison with other health care workers, while providing insight into their well-being by measuring time spent on work and nonwork activities. We found that, regardless of skill status, working in LTSS was associated with lower wages and an increased likelihood of experiencing poverty compared with other health care workers. Results from time diary data indicated that the LTSS workforce spent a greater share of their time working and commuting to work. Low-skill LTSS workers were hardest hit, spending more time on paid and unpaid activities, such as household and child care responsibilities.

摘要

到 2026 年,医疗助理、护理助手和家庭保健助手等职业需要新增 150 多万个岗位,其中许多将在长期服务和支持(LTSS)领域工作。我们利用美国时间使用调查 16 年的数据,比较了高技能和低技能 LTSS 工作者与其他医疗保健工作者的经济脆弱性,同时通过衡量工作和非工作活动的时间来了解他们的幸福感。我们发现,无论技能水平如何,与其他医疗保健工作者相比,在 LTSS 工作与工资较低和贫困可能性增加有关。时间记录数据的结果表明,LTSS 劳动力在工作和通勤上花费了更多的时间。低技能的 LTSS 工人受到的打击最大,他们在有偿和无偿活动上花费了更多时间,如家务和照顾孩子的责任。

相似文献

1
Financial Vulnerability and Worker Well-Being: A Comparison of Long-Term Services and Supports Workers With Other Health Workers.财务脆弱性与工人福祉:长期服务和支持工作者与其他卫生工作者的比较。
Med Care Res Rev. 2021 Oct;78(5):607-615. doi: 10.1177/1077558720930131. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
2
Tracking long-term services and supports rebalancing through workforce data.通过劳动力数据跟踪长期服务和支持的再平衡。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Aug;59(4):e14293. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14293. Epub 2024 Feb 21.
3
Racial Disparities in Financial Security, Work and Leisure Activities, and Quality of Life Among the Direct Care Workforce.直接护理人员的财务保障、工作和休闲活动以及生活质量方面的种族差异。
Gerontologist. 2021 Aug 13;61(6):838-850. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa190.
4
Characterizing the direct care health workforce in the United States, 2010-2019.描述 2010-2019 年美国直接护理卫生工作者的特征。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Feb;70(2):512-521. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17519. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
5
COVID-19: The Time for Collaboration Between Long-Term Services and Supports, Health Care Systems, and Public Health Is Now.COVID-19:现在是长期服务和支持、医疗保健系统以及公共卫生之间合作的时刻。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):565-594. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12500. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
6
Long-term services and supports in the community: toward a research agenda.社区长期服务与支持:迈向研究议程。
Disabil Health J. 2015 Jan;8(1):3-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.09.003. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
7
Transforming Direct Care Jobs, Reimagining Long-Term Services and Supports.转变直接护理工作,重新构想长期服务和支持。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Feb;23(2):207-213. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2021.12.005. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
8
Measuring nursing care time and tasks in long-term services and supports: one size does not fit all.测量长期服务和支持中的护理时间和任务:一刀切并不适合所有人。
J Nurs Res. 2012 Sep;20(3):159-68. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0b013e318263d977.
9
Workers' compensation costs for healthcare caregivers: Home healthcare, long-term care, and hospital nurses and nursing aides.医护工作者的工伤保险费用:家庭保健、长期护理、医院护士和护理助手。
Am J Ind Med. 2021 May;64(5):369-380. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23237. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
10
A Case for Federal Labor Legislation to Protect Underpaid Home Care Workers.一项关于联邦劳工立法以保护低薪家庭护理工作者的提案。
AMA J Ethics. 2022 Sep 1;24(9):E860-866. doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.860.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences In Nursing Home Staff COVID-19 Testing Rates And Odds Of Vaccination Across Work Shifts.不同班次养老护理人员的 COVID-19 检测率和疫苗接种率的差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Feb;42(2):217-226. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2022.01011.
2
The effect of nursing home closure on local employment in the United States.美国养老院关闭对当地就业的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2023 Jun;58(3):744-752. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14125. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
3
Implementing lateral flow devices in long-term care facilities: experiences from the Liverpool COVID-19 community testing pilot in care homes- a qualitative study.
在长期护理机构中实施横向流动设备:来自利物浦 COVID-19 社区测试试点在护理院的经验-一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 25;21(1):1153. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07191-9.
4
Perceptions of COVID-19 vaccines among healthcare assistants: A national survey.医护助理对 COVID-19 疫苗的看法:一项全国性调查。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jan;70(1):8-18. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17437. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
5
COVID-19: The Time for Collaboration Between Long-Term Services and Supports, Health Care Systems, and Public Health Is Now.COVID-19:现在是长期服务和支持、医疗保健系统以及公共卫生之间合作的时刻。
Milbank Q. 2021 Jun;99(2):565-594. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12500. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
6
Front-line Nursing Home Staff Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic.一线养老院员工在 COVID-19 大流行期间的经历。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021 Jan;22(1):199-203. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2020.11.022. Epub 2020 Nov 24.