• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗生素延迟时间与急诊科疑似脓毒症患者住院死亡率的相关性研究。

The Association Between Antibiotic Delay Intervals and Hospital Mortality Among Patients Treated in the Emergency Department for Suspected Sepsis.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health's Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC.

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):741-747. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004863.

DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000004863
PMID:33591002
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Rapid delivery of antibiotics is a cornerstone of sepsis therapy, although time targets for specific components of antibiotic delivery are unknown. We quantified time intervals comprising the task of antibiotic delivery and evaluated the association between interval delays and hospital mortality among patients treated in the emergency department for suspected sepsis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Twelve hospitals in Southeastern United States from 2014 to 2017.

PATIENTS

Twenty-four thousand ninety-three encounters among 20,026 adults with suspected sepsis in 12 emergency departments.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We divided antibiotic administration into two intervals: time from emergency department triage to antibiotic order (recognition delay) and time from antibiotic order to infusion (administration delay). We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate associations between these intervals and hospital mortality. Median time from emergency department triage to antibiotic administration was 3.4 hours (interquartile range, 2.0-6.0 hr), separated into a median recognition delay (time from emergency department triage to antibiotic order) of 2.7 hours(interquartile range, 1.5-4.7 hr) and median administration delay (time from antibiotic order to infusion) of 0.6 hours (0.3-1.2 hr). Adjusting for other risk factors, both recognition delay and administration delay were associated with mortality, but pairwise comparison with a no-delay reference group was not significant for up to 6 hours of recognition delay or up to 1.5 hours of administration delay.

CONCLUSIONS

Both recognition delays and administration delays were associated with increased hospital mortality, but only for longer delays. These results suggest that both metrics may be important to measure and improve for patients with suspected sepsis but do not support targets less than 1 hour.

摘要

目的

快速给予抗生素是脓毒症治疗的基石,尽管抗生素给药的特定组成部分的时间目标尚不清楚。我们量化了构成抗生素给药任务的时间间隔,并评估了在急诊科接受疑似脓毒症治疗的患者中,这些间隔延迟与医院死亡率之间的关系。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

2014 年至 2017 年美国东南部的 12 家医院。

患者

12 家急诊科 20026 名疑似脓毒症成人中的 24093 例就诊。

测量和主要结果

我们将抗生素给药分为两个间隔:从急诊科分诊到抗生素医嘱的时间(识别延迟)和从抗生素医嘱到输注的时间(给药延迟)。我们使用广义线性混合模型评估这些间隔与医院死亡率之间的关联。从急诊科分诊到抗生素给药的中位时间为 3.4 小时(四分位距,2.0-6.0 小时),分为中位识别延迟(从急诊科分诊到抗生素医嘱的时间)2.7 小时(四分位距,1.5-4.7 小时)和中位给药延迟(从抗生素医嘱到输注的时间)0.6 小时(0.3-1.2 小时)。在调整其他危险因素后,识别延迟和给药延迟均与死亡率相关,但与无延迟参考组进行的两两比较在长达 6 小时的识别延迟或长达 1.5 小时的给药延迟时无显著意义。

结论

识别延迟和给药延迟均与医院死亡率增加相关,但仅在延迟时间较长时才相关。这些结果表明,对于疑似脓毒症患者,这两个指标都可能需要测量和改进,但支持的目标时间不小于 1 小时。

相似文献

1
The Association Between Antibiotic Delay Intervals and Hospital Mortality Among Patients Treated in the Emergency Department for Suspected Sepsis.抗生素延迟时间与急诊科疑似脓毒症患者住院死亡率的相关性研究。
Crit Care Med. 2021 May 1;49(5):741-747. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004863.
2
The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗生素使用时机对严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克预后的影响:一项系统评价和Meta分析
Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1907-15. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001142.
3
First-to-second antibiotic delay and hospital mortality among emergency department patients with suspected sepsis.疑似脓毒症的急诊科患者中首次抗生素使用到开始使用抗生素之间的时间延迟与住院死亡率的关系。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug;46:20-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.02.059. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
4
Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program.经验性抗生素治疗从第一小时起即可降低严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的死亡率:基于指南的绩效改进项目结果
Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1749-55. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000330.
5
Delayed Second Dose Antibiotics for Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department With Sepsis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.急诊科收治的脓毒症患者延迟使用第二剂抗生素:患病率、危险因素及结局
Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):956-965. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002377.
6
Delays From First Medical Contact to Antibiotic Administration for Sepsis.从首次医疗接触到脓毒症患者使用抗生素的延迟情况。
Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):759-765. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002264.
7
Delays to Antibiotics in the Emergency Department and Risk of Mortality in Children With Sepsis.急诊科抗生素使用延迟与脓毒症患儿死亡风险的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2413955. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13955.
8
The Timing of Early Antibiotics and Hospital Mortality in Sepsis.脓毒症中早期使用抗生素的时机与医院死亡率
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Oct 1;196(7):856-863. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201609-1848OC.
9
INITIAT-E.D.: Impact of timing of INITIation of Antibiotic Therapy on mortality of patients presenting to an Emergency Department with sepsis.抗生素治疗起始时机对因脓毒症就诊于急诊科患者死亡率的影响。
Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Jun;27(3):196-201. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12394. Epub 2015 Apr 6.
10
Hospital Differences Drive Antibiotic Delays for Black Patients Compared With White Patients With Suspected Septic Shock.医院差异导致疑似感染性休克的黑人和白人患者接受抗生素治疗的时间存在差异。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb;46(2):e126-e131. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002829.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring the Potentials of Artificial Intelligence in Sepsis Management in the Intensive Care Unit.探索人工智能在重症监护病房脓毒症管理中的潜力。
Crit Care Res Pract. 2025 Aug 28;2025:9031137. doi: 10.1155/ccrp/9031137. eCollection 2025.
2
Appropriate timing of antibiotic initiation in patients with sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.脓毒症或脓毒性休克患者抗生素起始使用的适宜时机:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Korean J Intern Med. 2025 Sep;40(5):725-733. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2025.037. Epub 2025 Aug 26.
3
Clinical management of sepsis-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome: current evidence and future directions.
脓毒症相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征的临床管理:当前证据与未来方向
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 26;12:1531275. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1531275. eCollection 2025.
4
Sepsis Prediction Models are Trained on Labels that Diverge from Clinician-Recommended Treatment Times.脓毒症预测模型是基于与临床医生推荐的治疗时间不一致的标签进行训练的。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2025 May 22;2024:1215-1224. eCollection 2024.
5
The feasibility of antimicrobial lead time as process and quality indicator for hospitals.抗菌药物提前期作为医院流程和质量指标的可行性。
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025 May;44(5):1177-1183. doi: 10.1007/s10096-025-05085-w. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
6
A program to improve sepsis management in the Emergency Department: a multicenter prospective study in France.一项旨在改善急诊科脓毒症管理的项目:法国的一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Jan 31. doi: 10.1007/s11739-025-03877-8.
7
Early management of adult sepsis and septic shock: Korean clinical practice guidelines.成人脓毒症和脓毒性休克的早期管理:韩国临床实践指南
Acute Crit Care. 2024 Nov;39(4):445-472. doi: 10.4266/acc.2024.00920. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
8
Mortality of patients with sepsis in intensive care units at tertiary hospitals in Jordan: Prospective cohort study.约旦三级医院重症监护病房脓毒症患者的死亡率:前瞻性队列研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Oct 25;103(43):e40169. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040169.
9
Characteristics, clinical care, and outcomes of sepsis among patients boarding in the emergency department.急诊科留观患者中脓毒症的特征、临床护理及结局
J Hosp Med. 2025 Apr;20(4):368-373. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13536. Epub 2024 Oct 27.
10
Calprotectin, a Promising Serological Biomarker for the Early Diagnosis of Superinfections with Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria in Patients with COVID-19.钙卫蛋白:COVID-19 患者中多重耐药菌合并感染的早期诊断有前途的血清学标志物。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 27;25(17):9294. doi: 10.3390/ijms25179294.