• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Comment on "International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study".

作者信息

Kottner Jan, Cuddigan Janet, Balzer Katrin, Haesler Emily

机构信息

Charite Center 1 for Health and Human Sciences, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Gent, Belgium.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2021 Oct;18(5):742-743. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13520. Epub 2020 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1111/iwj.13520
PMID:33169540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8450801/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Comment on "International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study".对《重症患者压力性损伤预防干预措施风险水平的国际共识：一项改良德尔菲研究》的评论
Int Wound J. 2021 Oct;18(5):742-743. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13520. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
2
International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study.国际危重症患者压力性损伤预防干预措施风险级别共识：一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1112-1127. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13461. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
3
Authors' response to comment on "International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study".作者对关于“针对重症患者按风险水平进行压力性损伤预防干预的国际共识：一项改良德尔菲研究”的评论的回应
Int Wound J. 2021 Oct;18(5):738-741. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13519. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
4
Core outcomes for pressure ulcer prevention trials: results of an international consensus study: Classification: Outcomes and qualitative research.压疮预防试验的核心结局：一项国际共识研究的结果：分类：结局与定性研究
Br J Dermatol. 2022 Nov;187(5):743-752. doi: 10.1111/bjd.21741. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
5
Part 1: Pressure ulcer assessment - the development of Critical Care Pressure Ulcer Assessment Tool made Easy (CALCULATE).第1部分：压疮评估——《重症监护压疮评估工具轻松生成法》（CALCULATE）的开发
Nurs Crit Care. 2015 Nov;20(6):308-14. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12173. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
6
Core outcome measures for clinical effectiveness trials of nutritional and metabolic interventions in critical illness: an international modified Delphi consensus study evaluation (CONCISE).重症患者营养代谢干预的临床疗效试验的核心结局指标：国际改良德尔菲共识研究评估（CONCISE）。
Crit Care. 2022 Aug 6;26(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04113-x.
7
Outcomes for Pressure Ulcer Trials (OUTPUTs): protocol for the development of a core domain set for trials evaluating the clinical efficacy or effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention interventions.压力性溃疡试验结局（OUTPUTs）：用于评估压力性溃疡预防干预措施临床疗效或有效性的试验的核心领域集制定的方案。
Trials. 2019 Jul 22;20(1):449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3543-9.
8
Pressure Injury Prevention and Treatment in Critically Ill Children.危重症儿童压疮预防与治疗
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am. 2020 Dec;32(4):521-531. doi: 10.1016/j.cnc.2020.08.003. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
9
Turning and repositioning the critically ill patient with hemodynamic instability: a literature review and consensus recommendations.血流动力学不稳定的危重症患者的翻身与体位摆放：文献回顾与共识推荐
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;40(3):254-67. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e318290448f.
10
Consensus Obtained for the Nephrotoxic Potential of 167 Drugs in Adult Critically Ill Patients Using a Modified Delphi Method.采用改良 Delphi 法对成年危重症患者的 167 种药物的肾毒性潜力达成共识。
Drug Saf. 2022 Apr;45(4):389-398. doi: 10.1007/s40264-022-01173-4. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Compliance with preventive measures recommended by an international study group for pressure injuries in adult critically ill patients.遵守国际危重病成人压力性损伤研究小组推荐的预防措施。
Int Wound J. 2023 Apr;20(4):1205-1211. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13979. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

本文引用的文献

1
International consensus on pressure injury preventative interventions by risk level for critically ill patients: A modified Delphi study.国际危重症患者压力性损伤预防干预措施风险级别共识：一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Int Wound J. 2020 Oct;17(5):1112-1127. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13461. Epub 2020 Aug 16.
2
GRADE guidelines: 21 part 1. Study design, risk of bias, and indirectness in rating the certainty across a body of evidence for test accuracy.GRADE 指南：21 部分 1. 研究设计、偏倚风险和间接性，用于对一组证据进行测试准确性的确定性评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Jun;122:129-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.12.020. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
3
Risk assessment tools for the prevention of pressure ulcers.预防压疮的风险评估工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 31;1(1):CD006471. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006471.pub4.
4
Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers/injuries: The protocol for the second update of the international Clinical Practice Guideline 2019.压力性溃疡/损伤的预防与治疗：《2019年国际临床实践指南》第二次更新方案
J Tissue Viability. 2019 May;28(2):51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2019.01.001. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
5
Do pressure ulcer risk assessment scales improve clinical practice?压力性溃疡风险评估量表是否能改善临床实践？
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2010 Jul 23;3:103-11. doi: 10.2147/jmdh.s9286.