University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU/Julius Center), Utrecht, Netherlands.
PharmAccess Foundation, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 16;16(2):e0246868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246868. eCollection 2021.
While there is a growing body of research documenting unregulated African wild meat imports into Europe from the Africa continent, the drivers of this demand are virtually unknown. This study employs focus group discussions and a survey questionnaire to examine the attitudes and practices related to African wild meat consumption in the city of Amsterdam, Netherlands. The Ghanaian community was selected as the object of this study, as it is the largest West African population in the Netherlands and represents an important part of Dutch society. We model our report on a recent US study of the Liberian community of Minneapolis, Minnesota, which allows for the comparison of results between two Western countries. The overall perceived health risk of consuming African wild meat in The Netherlands is low and unlikely to deter consumption. However, local prices for the meat may be prohibitive in some cases. Incentives include health benefits, cultural drivers and a strong preference for the taste of African wild meat over all local meat alternatives. The study calls for further research into the nature of the drivers of demand for African wild meat as well as its public health consequences, in the Netherlands and beyond.
尽管越来越多的研究记录了非洲野生肉类未经监管从非洲大陆进口到欧洲的情况,但这种需求的驱动因素实际上尚不清楚。本研究采用焦点小组讨论和问卷调查的方式,考察了荷兰阿姆斯特丹市与食用非洲野生肉类相关的态度和做法。加纳社区被选为研究对象,因为它是荷兰最大的西非人群体,是荷兰社会的重要组成部分。我们的报告借鉴了最近美国明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯市利比里亚社区的一项研究,这使得我们可以在两个西方国家之间进行结果比较。在荷兰,食用非洲野生肉类的总体健康风险感知较低,不太可能阻止消费。然而,在某些情况下,当地的肉类价格可能过高。激励因素包括健康益处、文化驱动力以及对非洲野生肉类味道的强烈偏好,超过了所有当地肉类替代品。该研究呼吁进一步研究非洲野生肉类需求的驱动因素的性质及其在荷兰及其他地区的公共卫生后果。