知识共创：未来。
Co-production of knowledge: the future.
机构信息
Sax Institute, Sydney, Australia.
University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
出版信息
BMJ. 2021 Feb 16;372:n434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n434.
Abstract
A new collection highlights the role of co-production in strengthening health systems
摘要
新文集重点介绍了共同制定在加强卫生系统中的作用
相似文献
1
Co-production of knowledge: the future.知识共创：未来。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 16;372:n434. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n434.
2
Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research.有效吸引和参与社区利益攸关方共同开展全球卫生研究。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:n178. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n178.
3
Rethinking research processes to strengthen co-production in low and middle income countries.重新思考研究过程，以加强中低收入国家的共同制定研究计划。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:m4785. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4785.
4
Co-production of evidence for policies in Thailand: from concept to action.泰国政策证据的共同制定：从概念到行动。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:m4669. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4669.
5
Strengthening capacities and resource allocation for co-production of health research in low and middle income countries.加强中低收入国家健康研究共同生产的能力和资源配置。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:n166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n166.
6
Moving beyond project-specific patient and public involvement in research.超越特定项目中的患者及公众参与研究。
J R Soc Med. 2020 Jan;113(1):16-23. doi: 10.1177/0141076819890551.
7
Advancing health through research partnerships in Latin America.通过在拉丁美洲的研究伙伴关系促进健康。
BMJ. 2018 Jul 16;362:k2690. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2690.
8
Collaborative health service planning: A stakeholder analysis with social network analysis to develop a community pharmacy service.协同式卫生服务规划：利用社会网络分析制定社区药房服务的利益相关者分析。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2020 Feb;16(2):216-229. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2019.05.008. Epub 2019 May 21.
9
"Seeing" the Difference: The Importance of Visibility and Action as a Mark of "Authenticity" in Co-production Comment on "Collaboration and Co-production of Knowledge in Healthcare: Opportunities and Challenges".“看见”差异：可见性和行动作为合作生产中“真实性”标志的重要性 评“医疗保健知识的合作与共同生产：机遇与挑战”
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Jun 1;6(6):345-348. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2016.136.
10
Collective sensemaking for action: researchers and decision makers working collaboratively to strengthen health systems.集体意义建构行动：研究人员和决策者协同工作，以加强卫生系统。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:m4650. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4650.
引用本文的文献
1
Learning from volcanic eruptions: Co-production of knowledge at Merapi and Kelud, Indonesia.从火山喷发中学习：印度尼西亚默拉皮火山和克卢德火山的知识共同生产
Jamba. 2025 Aug 26;17(1):1881. doi: 10.4102/jamba.v17i1.1881. eCollection 2025.
2
Facilitating Access and Adherence to Physical Activity and Exercise for Service Users With Neurological Conditions in the Community: A Service Evaluation.促进社区中患有神经系统疾病的服务使用者参与并坚持体育活动和锻炼：一项服务评估。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2025 Aug;31(5):e70146. doi: 10.1111/jep.70146.
3
Creating the conditions for meaningful and effective PPIE in community-based public health research: learning from a UK-wide lived experience panel.为基于社区的公共卫生研究中开展有意义且有效的公众及患者参与、介入与合作创造条件：借鉴全英生活经历小组的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 17;11(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00727-x.
4
Better together: participatory action research for co-constructing an intervention to enhance leisure activities in non-ambulatory adolescents with cerebral palsy.携手共进：参与式行动研究共同构建一项干预措施，以增强非步行性脑瘫青少年的休闲活动。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 20;11(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00684-5.
5
Co-design of a Mobile Stroke Unit pathway highlights uncertainties and trade-offs for viable system-wide implementation in the English and Welsh NHS.移动卒中单元路径的共同设计凸显了在英格兰和威尔士国民医疗服务体系中进行可行的全系统实施所面临的不确定性和权衡。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jun 8;25(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01243-7.
6
Stakeholder involvement in a Cochrane review of physical rehabilitation after stroke: Description and reflections.利益相关者参与中风后物理康复的Cochrane系统评价：描述与思考。
Cochrane Evid Synth Methods. 2023 Dec 1;1(10):e12032. doi: 10.1002/cesm.12032. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Infant Parent Support (IPS): a multidisciplinary intervention to improve the mental health of children with a social worker - a study protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial with embedded process evaluation.婴幼儿家长支持项目（IPS）：一项由社会工作者参与的旨在改善儿童心理健康的多学科干预措施——一项包含过程评估的可行性随机对照试验的研究方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2025 Jun 5;11(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s40814-025-01616-6.
8
Co-Producing Resources to Help Improve Access to Primary Care for Young People With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.共同创造资源，以帮助改善患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的年轻人获得初级医疗保健的机会。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70200. doi: 10.1111/hex.70200.
9
COVID-19 Vaccine Literacy Among Black Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the USA.美国黑人孕妇和产后妇女的新冠疫苗知识水平
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025 Apr 29. doi: 10.1007/s40615-025-02430-9.
10
Stakeholder Involvement in the Development of a New Proactive Clinical Review of Patients Prescribed Opioid Medicines Long-Term for Persistent Pain in Primary Care.利益相关者参与制定针对基层医疗中因持续性疼痛长期开具阿片类药物的患者的新型主动临床审查。
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70264. doi: 10.1111/hex.70264.
本文引用的文献
1
Collective sensemaking for action: researchers and decision makers working collaboratively to strengthen health systems.集体意义建构行动：研究人员和决策者协同工作，以加强卫生系统。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:m4650. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4650.
2
International experiences with co-production and people centredness offer lessons for covid-19 responses.国际上在共同制定计划和以人为本方面的经验为应对新冠疫情提供了借鉴。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:m4752. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4752.
3
Effective engagement and involvement with community stakeholders in the co-production of global health research.有效吸引和参与社区利益攸关方共同开展全球卫生研究。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:n178. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n178.
4
Rethinking research processes to strengthen co-production in low and middle income countries.重新思考研究过程，以加强中低收入国家的共同制定研究计划。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:m4785. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4785.
5
Co-production of evidence for policies in Thailand: from concept to action.泰国政策证据的共同制定：从概念到行动。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:m4669. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m4669.
6
Strengthening capacities and resource allocation for co-production of health research in low and middle income countries.加强中低收入国家健康研究共同生产的能力和资源配置。
BMJ. 2021 Feb 15;372:n166. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n166.
7
Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.支持患者和公众参与研究的框架：系统评价与协同设计试点
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):785-801. doi: 10.1111/hex.12888. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
8
The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?共同生产的阴暗面：对于健康研究来说，其成本是否超过了收益？
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 28;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
9
Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial.提高政策机构利用研究成果的能力：一项阶梯式楔形试验。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Feb 6;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0408-8.
10
Does knowledge brokering improve the quality of rapid review proposals? A before and after study.知识中介是否能提高快速综述提案的质量？一项前后对照研究。
Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 28;6(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0411-0.
Zotero 插件