Suppr超能文献

提高政策机构利用研究成果的能力:一项阶梯式楔形试验。

Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial.

机构信息

The Sax Institute, PO Box K617, Haymarket, Sydney, NSW, 1240, Australia.

The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Feb 6;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0408-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This paper describes the trial of a novel intervention, Supporting Policy In health with evidence from Research: an Intervention Trial (SPIRIT). It examines (1) the feasibility of delivering this kind of programme in practice; (2) its acceptability to participants; (3) the impact of the programme on the capacity of policy agencies to engage with research; and (4) the engagement with and use of research by policy agencies.

METHODS

SPIRIT was a multifaceted, highly tailored, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, trial involving six health policy agencies in Sydney, Australia. Agencies were randomly allocated to one of three start dates to receive the 1-year intervention programme. SPIRIT included audit, feedback and goal setting; a leadership programme; staff training; the opportunity to test systems to facilitate research use in policies; and exchange with researchers. Outcome measures were collected at each agency every 6 months for 30 months.

RESULTS

Participation in SPIRIT was associated with significant increases in research use capacity at staff and agency levels. Staff reported increased confidence in research use skills, and agency leaders reported more extensive systems and structures in place to support research use. Self-report data suggested there was also an increase in tactical research use among agency staff. Given the relatively small numbers of participating agencies and the complexity of their contexts, findings suggest it is possible to effect change in the way policy agencies approach the use of research. This is supported by the responses on the other trial measures; while these were not statistically significant, on 18 of the 20 different measures used, the changes observed were consistent with the hypothesised intervention effect (that is, positive impacts).

CONCLUSIONS

As an early test of an innovative approach, SPIRIT has demonstrated that it is possible to increase research engagement and use in policy agencies. While more work is needed to establish the replicability and generalisability of these findings, this trial suggests that building staff skills and organisational structures may be effective in increasing evidence use.

摘要

背景

本文描述了一项新干预措施的试验,即支持政策制定的研究证据:一项干预试验(SPIRIT)。它检验了(1)在实践中实施此类计划的可行性;(2)参与者的接受程度;(3)该计划对政策机构参与研究的能力的影响;以及(4)政策机构对研究的参与度和利用度。

方法

SPIRIT 是一项多方面的、高度定制的、阶梯式、整群随机对照试验,涉及澳大利亚悉尼的 6 个卫生政策机构。机构被随机分配到 3 个开始日期之一,以接受为期 1 年的干预计划。SPIRIT 包括审计、反馈和目标设定;领导力计划;员工培训;有机会测试促进政策中研究利用的系统;以及与研究人员交流。在 30 个月的时间里,每 6 个月在每个机构收集一次结果。

结果

参与 SPIRIT 与员工和机构层面研究利用能力的显著提高相关。员工报告说,他们在研究利用技能方面的信心增强,机构领导者报告说,更多的系统和结构到位,以支持研究利用。自我报告的数据表明,机构工作人员中战术性研究利用也有所增加。鉴于参与机构的数量相对较少,以及其背景的复杂性,研究结果表明,有可能改变政策机构对待研究利用的方式。这一点得到了其他试验措施的回应的支持;虽然这些措施没有统计学意义,但在使用的 20 种不同措施中的 18 种中,观察到的变化与假设的干预效果一致(即积极影响)。

结论

作为对创新方法的早期测试,SPIRIT 表明,有可能增加政策机构的研究参与度和利用度。虽然需要更多的工作来确定这些发现的可重复性和普遍性,但这项试验表明,提高员工技能和组织结构可能是增加证据利用的有效方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/211e/6366302/93566e6fea0a/12961_2018_408_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验