• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国血管内卒中治疗获取途径及其对转运模式的影响

Mapping access to endovascular stroke care in the USA and implications for transport models.

机构信息

National Center for Geographic Information and Analysis and Department of Geography, University at Buffalo - The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York, USA.

Neurosurgery and Radiology and Canon Stroke and Vascular Research Center, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Jan;14(1). doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016942. Epub 2021 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016942
PMID:33593798
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine the percentage of the US population with 60 min ground or air access to accredited or state-designated endovascular-capable stroke centers (ECCs) and non-endovascular capable stroke centers (NECCs) and the percentage of NECCs with an ECC within a 30 min drive.

METHODS

Stroke centers were identified and classified broadly as ECCs or NECCs. Geographic mapping of stroke centers was performed. The population was divided into census blocks, and their centroids were calculated. Fastest air and ground travel times from centroid to nearest ECC and NECC were estimated.

RESULTS

Overall, 49.6% of US residents had 60 min ground access to ECCs. Approximately 37.7% (113 million) lack 60 min ground or air access to ECCs. Approximately 84.4% have 60 min access to NECCs. Ground-only access was available to 77.9%. Approximately 738 NECCs (45.4%) had an ECC within a 30 min drive.

CONCLUSION

Nearly one-third of the US population lacks 60 min access to endovascular stroke care, but this is highly variable. Transport models and planning of additional centers should be tailored to each state depending on location and proximity of existing facilities.

摘要

背景

本横断面研究旨在确定美国有多少人口可在 60 分钟内到达认可的或州指定的血管内治疗能力的卒中中心(ECC)和无血管内治疗能力的卒中中心(NECC),以及有多少 30 分钟车程内有 ECC 的 NECC。

方法

确定卒中中心,并将其广泛归类为 ECC 或 NECC。对卒中中心进行地理映射。将人群分为普查区,并计算其质心。从质心到最近的 ECC 和 NECC 的最快空中和地面旅行时间估计。

结果

总体而言,49.6%的美国居民可在 60 分钟内到达 ECC。大约 37.7%(11300 万人)缺乏 60 分钟地面或空中到达 ECC 的机会。大约 84.4%的人可在 60 分钟内到达 NECC。仅地面交通可达 77.9%。大约 738 个 NECC(45.4%)在 30 分钟车程内有 ECC。

结论

近三分之一的美国人口缺乏 60 分钟的血管内卒中治疗机会,但这种情况差异很大。应根据现有设施的位置和接近程度,为每个州量身定制交通模型和新中心规划。

相似文献

1
Mapping access to endovascular stroke care in the USA and implications for transport models.美国血管内卒中治疗获取途径及其对转运模式的影响
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Jan;14(1). doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016942. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
2
Impact of EMS bypass to endovascular capable hospitals: geospatial modeling analysis of the US STRATIS registry.经急诊医疗服务系统(EMS)转送至具备血管内治疗能力的医院的影响:美国 STRATIS 注册研究的地理空间建模分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Nov;12(11):1058-1063. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015593. Epub 2020 May 8.
3
Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Strokes: Current US Access Paradigms and Optimization Methodology.急性缺血性脑卒中的血管内血栓切除术:目前美国的介入途径与优化方法。
Stroke. 2020 Apr;51(4):1207-1217. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028850. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
4
Travel time and distance for bypass and non-bypass routing of stroke patients in the USA.美国脑卒中患者转院和非转院的旅行时间和距离。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2023 Jul;15(7):634-638. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2022-018787. Epub 2022 May 11.
5
Geographic access to acute stroke care in the United States.美国急性中风护理的地理可及性。
Stroke. 2014 Oct;45(10):3019-24. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006293. Epub 2014 Aug 26.
6
ACCESS: acute cerebrovascular care in emergency stroke systems.ACCESS:急诊卒中系统中的急性脑血管护理
Arch Neurol. 2010 Oct;67(10):1210-8. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2010.250.
7
Increased Access to and Use of Endovascular Therapy Following Implementation of a 2-Tiered Regional Stroke System.实施双层区域性脑卒中系统后血管内治疗的可及性和使用率增加。
Stroke. 2020 Mar;51(3):908-913. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.027756. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
8
A Geographical Analysis of Access to Trauma Centers from US National Parks in 2018.2018 年美国国家公园创伤中心可达性的地理分析。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2022 Dec;37(6):794-799. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X22001431. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
9
Disparities in accessibility of certified primary stroke centers.认证初级卒中中心可及性的差异。
Stroke. 2014 Nov;45(11):3381-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.006021. Epub 2014 Oct 9.
10
Geographic access to US Neurocritical Care Units registered with the Neurocritical Care Society.美国神经危重症监护学会注册的神经危重症监护单位的地理可达性。
Neurocrit Care. 2012 Apr;16(2):232-40. doi: 10.1007/s12028-011-9644-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Disparities in Timely Access to Certified Stroke Care Among US Census Tracts, by Prevalence of Health Risk Factors.按健康风险因素患病率划分的美国人口普查区在及时获得认证中风护理方面的差异。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2025 Jul 3;22:E33. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.240429.
2
Disparities in Access to Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke (DARTS): A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Geographical Factors.急性缺血性中风再灌注治疗可及性差异(DARTS):种族、社会经济地位和地理因素的综合荟萃分析
CNS Drugs. 2025 Apr;39(4):417-442. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01161-z. Epub 2025 Feb 15.
3
In the era of transition from fiction to reality: Robotic-assisted neurointervention-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
在从虚构走向现实的时代:机器人辅助神经介入治疗——一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Dec 27;48(1):7. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03155-9.
4
Geographic Access to High-Volume Mechanical Thrombectomy Centers in Florida, 2019.2019年佛罗里达州大容量机械血栓切除术中心的地理可达性
Neurol Clin Pract. 2024 Dec;14(6):e200337. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200337. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
5
Going for Distance or Speed? Determining the Optimal Hospital Destination for Patients With Acute Stroke in the Prehospital Setting.追求距离还是速度?确定院前环境下急性中风患者的最佳医院目的地。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Oct 17;12(20):e032263. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032263. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
6
Quantifying the amount of greater brain ischemia protection time with pre-hospital vs. in-hospital neuroprotective agent start.量化院前与院内开始使用神经保护剂时大脑缺血保护时间的延长量。
Front Neurol. 2022 Sep 13;13:990339. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.990339. eCollection 2022.
7
Mechanical Thrombectomy Access for All? Challenges in Increasing Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the United States.人人都能接受机械取栓治疗?美国增加急性缺血性卒中血管内治疗面临的挑战。
J Stroke. 2022 Jan;24(1):41-48. doi: 10.5853/jos.2021.03909. Epub 2022 Jan 31.