Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. R. P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;69(3):568-572. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_1540_20.
To quantitatively correlate the loss of stereopsis by induced anisometropia with its effect on tasks that require binocular vision and stereopsis, such as ophthalmic surgery in a simulated environment.
Thirty-nine ophthalmic residents with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better OU, with normal binocular vision and stereopsis, were recruited for the study. Anisometropia was induced using spherical and cylindrical trial lenses from +1D to +5D in a trial frame. The residents performed an anterior chamber navigation exercise on the EYESi simulator and the surgical score at baseline and for each level of induced anisometropia was noted. Near stereopsis was assessed by the Randot test and TNO test at baseline and for each level of induced anisometropia.
Stereoacuity on the Randot test and TNO test were 30 (95% CI, 25.9-34.1) and 44.4 (95% CI, 28.5-60.3) arcseconds, respectively which reduced to 65.5 (95% CI, 48.7-82.3) and 75.9 (95% CI, 15.5-136.3) arcseconds at anisometropia of +1D Sph (P < 0.001) and 380 (95% CI, 309.9-450.1) and 1922.1 (95% CI, 1582.5-2261.7) arcseconds for +5D Sph, respectively for the two tests, (P < 0.001). The corresponding surgical score reduced from 93.8 (95% CI, 91.1-96.7) to 87.5 (95% CI, 79.2-95.8, P < 0.001) for 1 DSph and 55.97 (95% CI, 38.3-73.7, P < 0.001) for 5DSph. There was a strong negative correlation between stereopsis scores and surgical task scores (Spearman's rho -0.86, P value <0.001) Similar changes were seen for anisometropia induced with cylindrical powers.
Induced anisometropia is associated with a significant diminution in surgical task scores in a simulated environment and this is correlated with the deterioration in stereoacuity. Assessment of stereopsis may be included as a regular part of the screening procedure for ophthalmic trainee residents.
定量分析因诱导性屈光参差导致的立体视锐度损失与对需要双眼视觉和立体视的任务的影响,例如模拟环境下的眼科手术。
招募了 39 名视力矫正至 20/20 或更好的眼科住院医师,双眼视力和立体视正常。在试镜架中使用+1D 至+5D 的球面和圆柱镜片诱导屈光参差。住院医师在 EYESi 模拟器上进行前房导航练习,并记录基线和每个诱导性屈光参差水平的手术评分。使用 Randot 测试和 TNO 测试评估近立体视锐度,分别在基线和每个诱导性屈光参差水平进行评估。
Randot 测试和 TNO 测试的立体视锐度分别为 30(95%置信区间,25.9-34.1)和 44.4(95%置信区间,28.5-60.3)弧秒,当诱导性屈光参差为+1D 球镜时,分别降至 65.5(95%置信区间,48.7-82.3)和 75.9(95%置信区间,15.5-136.3)弧秒(P<0.001),当诱导性屈光参差为+5D 球镜时,分别降至 380(95%置信区间,309.9-450.1)和 1922.1(95%置信区间,1582.5-2261.7)弧秒(P<0.001),两种测试结果均显著降低(P<0.001)。相应的手术评分从 93.8(95%置信区间,91.1-96.7)降至 87.5(95%置信区间,79.2-95.8,P<0.001),对于+1DSph;对于 5DSph,手术评分从 55.97(95%置信区间,38.3-73.7,P<0.001)降至 55.97(95%置信区间,38.3-73.7,P<0.001)。立体视锐度评分与手术任务评分之间存在很强的负相关关系(Spearman's rho=-0.86,P 值<0.001),类似的变化也出现在诱导性柱镜屈光度变化时。
在模拟环境中,诱导性屈光参差与手术任务评分显著降低相关,这与立体视锐度的恶化有关。评估立体视可能作为眼科住院医师筛选程序的常规部分。