Suppr超能文献

ICSD-3 诊断标准的系统分析及进一步结构化迭代的建议

A systematic analysis of ICSD-3 diagnostic criteria and proposal for further structured iteration.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Grenoble, Avenue du Maquis du Grésivaudan, 38 000 Grenoble, France; UMR CNRS 8590 IHPST, Sorbonne University, Paris 1, France.

Sleep Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, Gui-de-Chauliac Hospital, CHU Montpellier, France; Inserm, U1061, Université Montpellier 1, Montpellier, France.

出版信息

Sleep Med Rev. 2021 Aug;58:101439. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2021.101439. Epub 2021 Jan 26.

Abstract

The main objective of this theoretical review is to systematically analyze the type of International Classification of Sleep Disorders-3 (ICSD-3) diagnostic criteria by labeling each of them in order to propose an overview of the way in which the diagnostic criteria are organized. Labeling of diagnostic criteria using a rigorous iterative process of "aggregation" and "generalization" was conducted and inter-rater reliability calculation (Cohen's Kappa with three raters) was calculated. 241 criteria from 43 main sleep disorders of the ICSD-3 were labeled into nine types (Clinical manifestation 86.0% of sleep disorders, Objective markers 53.5%, Distress 30.2%, Disability 30.2%, Duration 30.2%, Frequency 58.1%, Age in 18.6%, Exclusion condition 81.4% and Associated condition 34.8%), with a high inter-rater reliability (Cohen's Kappa = 0.85). This analysis assumes that the structuring of the ICSD-3 diagnostic criteria is based on the Harmful Dysfunction Analysis (HDA). Some criteria correspond to the dysfunction part of the HDA while others refer to the harmful part. However, the approach does not seem to be homogeneous across the nosological classification. The use of a structured definition of sleep disorder and a framework to organize the ICSD diagnostic criteria is discussed with regard to the reliability and validity of criteria for diagnosing sleep disorders.

摘要

本理论综述的主要目的是通过对每种标准进行标记,系统地分析《国际睡眠障碍分类-3 版》(ICSD-3)诊断标准的类型,从而提出对诊断标准组织方式的概述。使用严格的“聚合”和“泛化”迭代过程对诊断标准进行标记,并计算了组内一致性系数(三位评估者的 Cohen's Kappa)。将 ICSD-3 中 43 种主要睡眠障碍中的 241 条标准标记为九种类型(86.0%的睡眠障碍为临床表现,53.5%为客观指标,30.2%为痛苦,30.2%为残疾,30.2%为持续时间,58.1%为频率,18.6%为年龄,81.4%为排除条件,34.8%为合并条件),具有较高的组内一致性系数(Cohen's Kappa=0.85)。该分析假设 ICSD-3 诊断标准的结构基于有害功能障碍分析(HDA)。一些标准对应于 HDA 的功能障碍部分,而另一些标准则涉及有害部分。然而,这种方法似乎在分类上并不统一。本文还讨论了使用结构化的睡眠障碍定义和框架来组织 ICSD 诊断标准,以及这些标准在诊断睡眠障碍时的可靠性和有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验