Wolf Jeffrey C
Experimental Pathology Laboratories, Inc, Sterling, VA, USA.
Toxicol Pathol. 2021 Jul;49(5):1024-1041. doi: 10.1177/0192623321989653. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
A number of studies have investigated the potential toxicity of the analgesic agent diclofenac (DCF) in various fish species under a diverse array of experimental conditions. Reported evidence of toxicity in these investigations is often strongly reliant on morphologic end points such as histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and transmission electron microscopy. However, it may be challenging for scientists who perform environmental hazard or risk determination to fully appreciate the intricacies of these specialized endpoints. Therefore, the purpose of the current review was to critically assess the quality of morphologic data in 14 papers that described the experimental exposure of fish to DCF. Areas of focus during this review included study design, diagnostic accuracy, magnitude of reported changes, data interpretation and presentation, and the credibility of individual reported findings. Positive attributes of some studies included robust experimental designs, accurate diagnoses, and straightforward and transparent data reporting. Issues identified in certain articles included diagnostic errors, failure to account for sampling and/or observer bias, failure to evaluate findings according to sex, exaggeration of lesion severity, interstudy inconsistencies, unexplained phenomena, and incomplete or ambiguous data presentation. It is hoped that the outcome of this review will be of value for personnel involved in regulatory decision-making.
许多研究在各种实验条件下调查了镇痛剂双氯芬酸(DCF)对多种鱼类的潜在毒性。在这些调查中,所报告的毒性证据通常强烈依赖于组织病理学、免疫组织化学和透射电子显微镜等形态学终点。然而,对于进行环境危害或风险评估的科学家来说,要充分理解这些专业终点的复杂性可能具有挑战性。因此,本综述的目的是批判性地评估14篇描述鱼类实验性接触DCF的论文中形态学数据的质量。本次综述的重点领域包括研究设计、诊断准确性、报告变化的程度、数据解释和呈现,以及各个报告结果的可信度。一些研究的积极属性包括稳健的实验设计、准确的诊断以及直接和透明的数据报告。某些文章中发现的问题包括诊断错误、未考虑抽样和/或观察者偏差、未按性别评估结果、夸大病变严重程度、研究间不一致、无法解释的现象以及不完整或模糊的数据呈现。希望本综述的结果对参与监管决策的人员有价值。