• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过 qgPCR 和 SNP 基因分型实现简单可靠的 CRISPR 诱导的靶标效应检测。

Simple and reliable detection of CRISPR-induced on-target effects by qgPCR and SNP genotyping.

机构信息

Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research (ISD), University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences, LMU Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.

出版信息

Nat Protoc. 2021 Mar;16(3):1714-1739. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-00481-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1038/s41596-020-00481-2
PMID:33597771
Abstract

The recent CRISPR revolution has provided researchers with powerful tools to perform genome editing in a variety of organisms. However, recent reports indicate widespread occurrence of unintended CRISPR-induced on-target effects (OnTEs) at the edited site in mice and human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) that escape standard quality controls. By altering gene expression of targeted or neighbouring genes, OnTEs can severely affect phenotypes of CRISPR-edited cells and organisms and thus lead to data misinterpretation, which can undermine the reliability of CRISPR-based studies. Here we describe a broadly applicable framework for detecting OnTEs in genome-edited cells and organisms after non-homologous end joining-mediated and homology-directed repair-mediated editing. Our protocol enables identification of OnTEs such as large deletions, large insertions, rearrangements or loss of heterozygosity (LOH). This is achieved by subjecting genomic DNA first to quantitative genotyping PCR (qgPCR), which determines the number of intact alleles at the target site using the same PCR amplicon that has been optimized for genotyping. This combination of genotyping and quantitation makes it possible to exclude clones with monoallelic OnTEs and hemizygous editing, which are often mischaracterized as correctly edited in standard Sanger sequencing. Second, occurrence of LOH around the edited locus is detected by genotyping neighbouring single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), using either a Sanger sequencing-based method or SNP microarrays. All steps are optimized to maximize simplicity and minimize cost to promote wide dissemination and applicability across the field. The entire protocol from genomic DNA extraction to OnTE exclusion can be performed in 6-9 d.

摘要

最近的 CRISPR 革命为研究人员提供了强大的工具,可在多种生物体中进行基因组编辑。然而,最近的报告表明,在编辑后的小鼠和人类诱导多能干细胞 (iPSC) 中,广泛存在标准质量控制无法检测到的非预期 CRISPR 诱导的靶标效应 (OnTE)。通过改变靶向或邻近基因的表达,OnTE 会严重影响 CRISPR 编辑细胞和生物体的表型,从而导致数据解读错误,这可能会破坏基于 CRISPR 的研究的可靠性。在这里,我们描述了一种广泛适用于检测非同源末端连接介导和同源定向修复介导编辑后基因组编辑细胞和生物体中的 OnTE 的框架。我们的方案可识别 OnTE,如大片段缺失、大片段插入、重排或杂合性丢失 (LOH)。这是通过首先对基因组 DNA 进行定量基因分型 PCR (qgPCR) 来实现的,该方法使用已针对基因分型进行优化的相同 PCR 扩增子来确定靶位点的完整等位基因数量。这种基因分型和定量的组合使得能够排除单等位基因 OnTE 和半合子编辑的克隆,这些克隆在标准 Sanger 测序中通常被错误地描述为正确编辑。其次,通过对编辑位点附近的单核苷酸多态性 (SNP) 进行基因分型,检测 LOH 的发生,这可以使用基于 Sanger 测序的方法或 SNP 微阵列来实现。所有步骤都经过优化,以最大限度地提高简单性和降低成本,从而促进该方案在整个领域的广泛传播和适用性。从基因组 DNA 提取到排除 OnTE 的整个过程可以在 6-9 天内完成。

相似文献

1
Simple and reliable detection of CRISPR-induced on-target effects by qgPCR and SNP genotyping.通过 qgPCR 和 SNP 基因分型实现简单可靠的 CRISPR 诱导的靶标效应检测。
Nat Protoc. 2021 Mar;16(3):1714-1739. doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-00481-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
Detection of Deleterious On-Target Effects after HDR-Mediated CRISPR Editing.HDR 介导的 CRISPR 编辑后有害的靶标效应的检测。
Cell Rep. 2020 May 26;31(8):107689. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107689.
3
qEva-CRISPR: a method for quantitative evaluation of CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing in target and off-target sites.qEva-CRISPR:一种用于定量评估靶向和非靶向位点 CRISPR/Cas 介导基因组编辑的方法。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2018 Sep 28;46(17):e101. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky505.
4
CRISPR/Cas9 Technology in Translational Biomedicine.转化医学中的CRISPR/Cas9技术
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2020 Apr 17;54(3):354-370. doi: 10.33594/000000224.
5
CRISPR-Based Technologies: Impact of RNA-Targeting Systems.基于 CRISPR 的技术:RNA 靶向系统的影响。
Mol Cell. 2018 Nov 1;72(3):404-412. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.09.018.
6
Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in approaches in zebrafish.在斑马鱼中使用基于CRISPR/Cas9的敲入方法进行基因组编辑。
Methods. 2017 May 15;121-122:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 12.
7
A simple and effective genotyping workflow for rapid detection of CRISPR genome editing.一种简单有效的基因分型工作流程,用于快速检测 CRISPR 基因组编辑。
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2024 Apr 1;326(4):G473-G481. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00013.2024. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
8
Clearance of residual genome editing components used for ex vivo genome-editing of allogeneic cell therapy products.清除用于同种异体细胞治疗产品体外基因组编辑的残留基因组编辑组件。
Cytotherapy. 2024 Nov;26(11):1341-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2024.06.005. Epub 2024 Jul 11.
9
Efficient introduction of specific homozygous and heterozygous mutations using CRISPR/Cas9.利用 CRISPR/Cas9 高效引入特定的纯合子和杂合子突变。
Nature. 2016 May 5;533(7601):125-9. doi: 10.1038/nature17664. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
10
Optimization of genome editing through CRISPR-Cas9 engineering.通过CRISPR-Cas9工程优化基因组编辑。
Bioengineered. 2016 Apr;7(3):166-74. doi: 10.1080/21655979.2016.1189039.

引用本文的文献

1
Cell autonomous microglia defects in a stem cell model of frontotemporal dementia tau.额颞叶痴呆tau蛋白干细胞模型中的细胞自主性小胶质细胞缺陷。
Mol Psychiatry. 2025 Jun 17. doi: 10.1038/s41380-025-03073-2.
2
DCHS1 Modulates Forebrain Proportions in Modern Humans via a Glycosylation Change.DCHS1通过糖基化变化调节现代人类的前脑比例。
bioRxiv. 2025 May 14:2025.05.14.654031. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.14.654031.
3
Robust prediction of synthetic gRNA activity and cryptic DNA repair by disentangling cellular CRISPR cleavage outcomes.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying CRISPR off-target effects.量化CRISPR脱靶效应。
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2019 May 31;3(3):327-334. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20180146.
2
Precise allele-specific genome editing by spatiotemporal control of CRISPR-Cas9 via pronuclear transplantation.通过核移植时空控制 CRISPR-Cas9 实现精确的等位基因特异性基因组编辑。
Nat Commun. 2020 Sep 14;11(1):4593. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18391-y.
3
Long-read individual-molecule sequencing reveals CRISPR-induced genetic heterogeneity in human ESCs.长读单分子测序揭示了 CRISPR 诱导的人类胚胎干细胞中的遗传异质性。
通过解析细胞CRISPR切割结果对合成gRNA活性和隐蔽DNA修复进行稳健预测。
Nat Commun. 2025 May 21;16(1):4717. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59947-0.
4
γ-Secretase modulator resistance of an aggressive Alzheimer-causing presenilin mutant can be overcome in the heterozygous patient state by a set of advanced compounds.一组先进的化合物可在杂合患者状态下克服具有侵袭性的致阿尔茨海默病早老素突变体对γ-分泌酶调节剂的抗性。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2025 Feb 19;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13195-025-01680-3.
5
Proteomics of mouse brain endothelium uncovers dysregulation of vesicular transport pathways during aging.小鼠脑内皮细胞蛋白质组学揭示衰老过程中囊泡运输途径的失调。
Nat Aging. 2024 Apr;4(4):595-612. doi: 10.1038/s43587-024-00598-z. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
6
Reduced synaptic depression in human neurons carrying homozygous disease-causing STXBP1 variant L446F.携带同源致病性 STXBP1 变异 L446F 的人类神经元中突触抑制减弱。
Hum Mol Genet. 2024 May 18;33(11):991-1000. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddae035.
7
Long-read sequencing for fast and robust identification of correct genome-edited alleles: PCR-based and Cas9 capture methods.长读测序可快速、稳健地鉴定正确编辑的基因组等位基因:基于 PCR 和 Cas9 捕获的方法。
PLoS Genet. 2024 Mar 8;20(3):e1011187. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011187. eCollection 2024 Mar.
8
One-pot DTECT enables rapid and efficient capture of genetic signatures for precision genome editing and clinical diagnostics.一锅法 DTECT 可快速有效地捕获用于精确基因组编辑和临床诊断的遗传特征。
Cell Rep Methods. 2024 Feb 26;4(2):100698. doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2024.100698. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
9
Unintended CRISPR-Cas9 editing outcomes: a review of the detection and prevalence of structural variants generated by gene-editing in human cells.非预期的 CRISPR-Cas9 编辑结果:对人类细胞中基因编辑产生的结构变异的检测和流行情况的综述。
Hum Genet. 2023 Jun;142(6):705-720. doi: 10.1007/s00439-023-02561-1. Epub 2023 Apr 24.
10
Detection of unintended on-target effects in CRISPR genome editing by DNA donors carrying diagnostic substitutions.通过携带诊断性替换的 DNA 供体检测 CRISPR 基因组编辑中的非预期靶向效应。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2023 Mar 21;51(5):e26. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1254.
Genome Biol. 2020 Aug 24;21(1):213. doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02143-8.
4
Technologies and Computational Analysis Strategies for CRISPR Applications.CRISPR 应用的技术和计算分析策略。
Mol Cell. 2020 Jul 2;79(1):11-29. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2020.06.012.
5
Detection of Deleterious On-Target Effects after HDR-Mediated CRISPR Editing.HDR 介导的 CRISPR 编辑后有害的靶标效应的检测。
Cell Rep. 2020 May 26;31(8):107689. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.107689.
6
Structural variation in the sequencing era.测序时代的结构变异。
Nat Rev Genet. 2020 Mar;21(3):171-189. doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0180-9. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
7
Mitigation of off-target toxicity in CRISPR-Cas9 screens for essential non-coding elements.在针对必需非编码元件的 CRISPR-Cas9 筛选中减轻脱靶毒性。
Nat Commun. 2019 Sep 6;10(1):4063. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11955-7.
8
Comprehensive evaluation of structural variation detection algorithms for whole genome sequencing.全基因组测序结构变异检测算法的综合评估。
Genome Biol. 2019 Jun 3;20(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1720-5.
9
Microhomologies are prevalent at Cas9-induced larger deletions.微同源序列在 Cas9 诱导的较大缺失中普遍存在。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Aug 22;47(14):7402-7417. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz459.
10
The Ultimate qPCR Experiment: Producing Publication Quality, Reproducible Data the First Time.终极 qPCR 实验:首次获得具有出版质量、可重复数据
Trends Biotechnol. 2019 Jul;37(7):761-774. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Jan 14.