Petroelje Tyler R, Kautz Todd M, Beyer Dean E, Belant Jerrold L
Global Wildlife Conservation Center College of Environmental Science and Forestry State University of New York Syracuse NY USA.
Wildlife Division Michigan Department of Natural Resources Marquette MI USA.
Ecol Evol. 2021 Jan 11;11(3):1413-1431. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7153. eCollection 2021 Feb.
Interference competition occurs when two species have similar resource requirements and one species is dominant and can suppress or exclude the subordinate species. Wolves () and coyotes () are sympatric across much of their range in North America where white-tailed deer () can be an important prey species. We assessed the extent of niche overlap between wolves and coyotes using activity, diet, and space use as evidence for interference competition during three periods related to the availability of white-tailed deer fawns in the Upper Great Lakes region of the USA. We assessed activity overlap (Δ) with data from accelerometers onboard global positioning system (GPS) collars worn by wolves ( = 11) and coyotes ( = 13). We analyzed wolf and coyote scat to estimate dietary breadth () and food niche overlap (). We used resource utilization functions (RUFs) with canid GPS location data, white-tailed deer RUFs, ruffed grouse () and snowshoe hare () densities, and landscape covariates to compare population-level space use. Wolves and coyotes exhibited considerable overlap in activity (Δ = 0.86-0.92), diet ( = 3.1-4.9; = 0.76-1.0), and space use of active and inactive RUFs across time periods. Coyotes relied less on deer as prey compared to wolves and consumed greater amounts of smaller prey items. Coyotes exhibited greater population-level variation in space use compared to wolves. Additionally, while active and inactive, coyotes exhibited greater selection of some land covers as compared to wolves. Our findings lend support for interference competition between wolves and coyotes with significant overlap across resource attributes examined. The mechanisms through which wolves and coyotes coexist appear to be driven largely by how coyotes, a generalist species, exploit narrow differences in resource availability and display greater population-level plasticity in resource use.
当两个物种具有相似的资源需求,且一个物种占主导地位并能够抑制或排除从属物种时,就会发生干扰竞争。狼( )和郊狼( )在北美大部分分布区域内同域共存,在那里白尾鹿( )可能是一种重要的猎物。我们利用活动、饮食和空间利用情况,作为美国大湖地区上游与白尾鹿幼崽可获得性相关的三个时期内干扰竞争的证据,评估了狼和郊狼之间生态位重叠的程度。我们使用安装在狼( = 11)和郊狼( = 13)佩戴的全球定位系统(GPS)项圈上的加速度计数据,评估活动重叠度(Δ)。我们分析了狼和郊狼的粪便,以估计饮食广度( )和食物生态位重叠度( )。我们使用资源利用函数(RUFs),结合犬科动物GPS定位数据、白尾鹿RUFs、披肩鸡( )和雪鞋兔( )密度以及景观协变量,来比较种群水平上的空间利用情况。狼和郊狼在活动(Δ = 0.86 - 0.92)、饮食( = 3.1 - 4.9; = 0.76 - 1.0)以及不同时间段内活跃和不活跃RUFs的空间利用方面表现出相当大的重叠。与狼相比,郊狼对鹿作为猎物的依赖程度较低,并且消耗更多数量的较小猎物。与狼相比,郊狼在种群水平上的空间利用表现出更大的变化。此外,无论活跃还是不活跃时,郊狼与狼相比都表现出对某些土地覆盖类型更强的选择倾向。我们的研究结果支持了狼和郊狼之间存在干扰竞争,在所研究的资源属性方面存在显著重叠。狼和郊狼共存的机制似乎很大程度上是由郊狼这种泛化物种如何利用资源可获得性方面的细微差异以及在资源利用上表现出更大的种群水平可塑性所驱动的。