Polillo Alexia, Gran-Ruaz Sophia, Sylvestre John, Kerman Nick
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Digit Health. 2021 Feb 2;7:2055207620987066. doi: 10.1177/2055207620987066. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
eHealth interventions are being developed to meet the needs of diverse populations. Despite these advancements, little is known about how these interventions are used to improve the health of persons experiencing homelessness. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the feasibility, effectiveness, and experience of eHealth interventions for the homeless population.
Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of PsycINFO, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted along with forward and backward citation searching to identify relevant articles.
Eight articles met eligibility criteria. All articles were pilot or feasibility studies that used modalities, including short message service, mobile apps, computers, email, and websites, to deliver the interventions. The accessibility, flexibility, and convenience of the interventions were valued by participants. However, phone retention, limited adaptability, a high level of human involvement, and preference for in-person communication may pose future implementation challenges.
eHealth interventions are promising digital tools that have the potential to improve access to care and service delivery. eHealth interventions are feasible and usable for persons experiencing homelessness. These interventions may have health benefits by augmenting existing services and if implementation challenges are addressed. Further evaluation of the effectiveness of eHealth interventions is needed before widespread implementation. Those with lived experience should also be engaged in developing and evaluating these interventions.
正在开发电子健康干预措施以满足不同人群的需求。尽管有这些进展,但对于这些干预措施如何用于改善无家可归者的健康状况却知之甚少。本系统评价的目的是检验针对无家可归人群的电子健康干预措施的可行性、有效性和体验。
遵循PRISMA指南,对PsycINFO、PubMed、科学网和谷歌学术进行系统检索,并进行向前和向后的引文检索以识别相关文章。
8篇文章符合纳入标准。所有文章均为试点或可行性研究,这些研究使用了包括短信服务、移动应用程序、计算机、电子邮件和网站在内的方式来提供干预措施。参与者重视干预措施的可及性、灵活性和便利性。然而,电话保留、适应性有限、高度的人力参与以及对面对面交流的偏好可能会给未来的实施带来挑战。
电子健康干预措施是很有前景的数字工具,有可能改善医疗服务的可及性和服务提供。电子健康干预措施对无家可归者来说是可行且可用的。如果解决了实施挑战,这些干预措施可能会通过增强现有服务而带来健康益处。在广泛实施之前,需要进一步评估电子健康干预措施的有效性。有实际生活经历的人也应参与这些干预措施的开发和评估。