• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重多重弱势群体在口腔健康、物质使用、吸烟及饮食方面获得支持并参与相关活动的情况:一项定性研究。

Engagement and access to support for oral health, substance use, smoking and diet by people with severe and multiple disadvantage: A qualitative study.

作者信息

Jain Neha, Adams Emma A, Joyes Emma C, McLellan Gillian, Burrows Martin, Paisi Martha, McGowan Laura J, Iafrate Lorenzo, Landes David, Watt Richard, Sniehotta Falko F, Kaner Eileen, Ramsay Sheena E

机构信息

Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.

Inclusive Insights, Bournemouth, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Dec 18;19(12):e0315254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315254. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0315254
PMID:39693306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11654955/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe and multiple disadvantage (SMD) is the combined effect of experiencing homelessness, substance use and repeat offending. People experiencing SMD have high burden of physical and mental health issues. Oral health is one of the most common health problems in people experiencing SMD which interacts with substance use, smoking, and unhealthy diet to create a cycle of harm and disadvantage. However, burden of these conditions is worsened by poor access to health services. This study aimed to identify pathways to improve engagement and access to health interventions, for oral health, substance and alcohol use, smoking and diet.

METHODS

Using a qualitative methodology, interviews/focus groups were conducted with: (a) people experiencing SMD in Newcastle Upon Tyne/Gateshead; and (b) frontline staff, volunteer workers, policy makers and commissioners from London, Plymouth and Newcastle Upon Tyne/Gateshead. Data was analysed iteratively using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight people experiencing SMD (age range: 27-65 years; 21% females) and 78 service providers (age range: 28-72 years, 63% females) were interviewed or included in focus groups. Data were organized into two overarching factors: barriers to accessing health interventions and improving access to health interventions. Barriers included: wider disadvantages of people experiencing SMD leading to low priority for support for oral health and associated health behaviours, psychosocial factors, waiting period and physical space. Factors that improved access to interventions included: positive relationships between service provider and person experiencing SMD, including a support worker, location of services and outreach services.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest the need for flexibility in offering services for oral health and related health behaviours for people experiencing SMD. Training health care providers and co-developing services with people with lived experience of SMD can help prevent (re)stigmatization. Systems-based approach to address factors on an environmental, organizational, inter-personal and individual level is needed. The results from this study could be extrapolated to other health intervention such as vaccinations and sexual and reproductive health.

摘要

背景

严重多重不利因素(SMD)是无家可归、物质使用和反复犯罪共同作用的结果。经历SMD的人群身心健康问题负担沉重。口腔健康是经历SMD的人群中最常见的健康问题之一,它与物质使用、吸烟和不健康饮食相互作用,形成一个伤害和不利的循环。然而,获得医疗服务的机会不足使这些情况的负担更加沉重。本研究旨在确定改善参与和获得口腔健康、物质和酒精使用、吸烟及饮食方面健康干预措施的途径。

方法

采用定性研究方法,对以下人群进行了访谈/焦点小组讨论:(a)泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔/盖茨黑德经历SMD的人群;(b)来自伦敦、普利茅斯以及泰恩河畔纽卡斯尔/盖茨黑德的一线工作人员、志愿者、政策制定者和服务专员。使用主题分析法对数据进行迭代分析。

结果

对28名经历SMD的人群(年龄范围:27 - 65岁;21%为女性)和78名服务提供者(年龄范围:28 - 72岁,63%为女性)进行了访谈或纳入焦点小组讨论。数据被归纳为两个总体因素:获得健康干预措施的障碍和改善获得健康干预措施的途径。障碍包括:经历SMD的人群面临的更广泛不利因素导致对口腔健康及相关健康行为的支持优先级较低、心理社会因素、等待期和物理空间。改善获得干预措施途径的因素包括:服务提供者与经历SMD的人群之间的积极关系,包括一名支持工作者、服务地点和外展服务。

结论

研究结果表明,为经历SMD的人群提供口腔健康及相关健康行为服务需要灵活性。培训医疗保健提供者并与有SMD生活经历的人群共同开发服务有助于防止(再)污名化。需要采用基于系统的方法来解决环境、组织、人际和个人层面的因素。本研究结果可外推至其他健康干预措施,如疫苗接种以及性健康和生殖健康。

相似文献

1
Engagement and access to support for oral health, substance use, smoking and diet by people with severe and multiple disadvantage: A qualitative study.严重多重弱势群体在口腔健康、物质使用、吸烟及饮食方面获得支持并参与相关活动的情况:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 18;19(12):e0315254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315254. eCollection 2024.
2
Factors affecting implementation of interventions for oral health, substance use, smoking and diet for people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a community-based qualitative study in England.影响针对严重多重弱势群体开展口腔健康、物质使用、吸烟及饮食干预措施实施情况的因素:英格兰一项基于社区的定性研究
BMJ Public Health. 2024 May 2;2(1):e000626. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000626. eCollection 2024 Jun.
3
Interventions to improve oral health and related health behaviours of substance use, smoking, and diet in people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a systematic review of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness.改善处于严重多重不利状况人群的口腔健康以及物质使用、吸烟和饮食等相关健康行为的干预措施:有效性和成本效益的系统评价
Lancet. 2023 Nov;402 Suppl 1:S58. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02151-7.
4
Exploring Interventions to Improve the Oral Health and Related Health Behaviours of Adults Experiencing Severe and Multiple Disadvantage: Protocol for a Qualitative Study with Stakeholders.探索改善经历严重和多重劣势的成年人的口腔健康和相关健康行为的干预措施:与利益相关者进行定性研究的方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;18(22):11755. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211755.
5
Improving oral health and related health behaviours (substance use, smoking, diet) in people with severe and multiple disadvantage: A systematic review of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions.改善严重多重弱势人群的口腔健康和相关健康行为(物质使用、吸烟、饮食):干预措施的有效性和成本效益的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0298885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298885. eCollection 2024.
6
Improving access to general practice for and with people with severe and multiple disadvantage: a qualitative study.改善严重多重弱势群体获得全科医疗服务的机会:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2024 Apr 25;74(742):e330-e338. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0244. Print 2024 May.
7
A peer-delivered intervention to reduce harm and improve the well-being of homeless people with problem substance use: the SHARPS feasibility mixed-methods study.一种由同伴提供的干预措施,旨在减少有问题物质使用的无家可归者的伤害并改善其福祉:SHARPS 可行性混合方法研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Feb;26(14):1-128. doi: 10.3310/WVVL4786.
8
Investigating the Effectiveness and Acceptability of Oral Health and Related Health Behaviour Interventions in Adults with Severe and Multiple Disadvantage: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Systematic Review.调查严重和多重弱势成年人的口腔健康和相关健康行为干预措施的有效性和可接受性:一项混合方法系统评价的方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 3;18(21):11554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111554.
9
The central role of housing key workers in supporting healthcare interactions for people experiencing homelessness and implications for palliative care: a qualitative study.住房关键工作者在支持无家可归者的医疗互动中的核心作用及对姑息治疗的影响:一项定性研究
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 2;23(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01598-x.
10
Interventions to reduce tobacco use in people experiencing homelessness.减少无家可归人群吸烟的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013413. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013413.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Homelessness and predictors of criminal reoffending: A retrospective cohort study.无家可归与犯罪再犯的预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2023 Aug;33(4):261-275. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2298. Epub 2023 Jun 2.
2
Exploring Interventions to Improve the Oral Health and Related Health Behaviours of Adults Experiencing Severe and Multiple Disadvantage: Protocol for a Qualitative Study with Stakeholders.探索改善经历严重和多重劣势的成年人的口腔健康和相关健康行为的干预措施:与利益相关者进行定性研究的方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;18(22):11755. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211755.
3
The use of eHealth interventions among persons experiencing homelessness: A systematic review.无家可归者中电子健康干预措施的应用:一项系统综述。
Digit Health. 2021 Feb 2;7:2055207620987066. doi: 10.1177/2055207620987066. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
4
Evaluation of a community dental clinic providing care to people experiencing homelessness: A mixed methods approach.评估为无家可归者提供服务的社区牙科诊所:混合方法研究。
Health Expect. 2020 Oct;23(5):1289-1299. doi: 10.1111/hex.13111. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
5
Experience of healthcare among the homeless and vulnerably housed a qualitative study: opportunities for equity-oriented health care.无家可归者和弱势住房者的医疗保健体验:以公平为导向的医疗保健机会。
Int J Equity Health. 2019 Jul 1;18(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12939-019-1004-4.
6
Quality of life related to oral health and its impact in adults.与口腔健康相关的生活质量及其对成年人的影响。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Jun;120(3):234-239. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
7
Barriers and enablers to accessing dental services for people experiencing homelessness: A systematic review.无家可归者获取牙科服务的障碍和促进因素:系统评价。
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;47(2):103-111. doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12444. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
8
Emergency Department Use for Dental Problems among Homeless Individuals: A Population-Based Cohort Study.无家可归者中因牙科问题前往急诊科就诊情况:一项基于人群的队列研究。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(2):860-8. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0081.
9
Evaluation of a community dental service for homeless and 'hard to reach' people.对一项针对无家可归者和“难以接触到”人群的社区牙科服务的评估。
Br Dent J. 2016 Jan 22;220(2):67-70. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2016.56.
10
Barriers and facilitators to primary care for people with mental health and/or substance use issues: a qualitative study.心理健康和/或物质使用问题患者获得初级保健服务的障碍与促进因素:一项定性研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2015 Oct 13;16:135. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0353-3.