• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

回顾性验证一种用于管理钝性胸部创伤患者的风险分层工具(STUMBL 评分)。

Retrospective validation of a risk stratification tool developed for the management of patients with blunt chest trauma (the STUMBL score).

机构信息

Emergency Department, Capital and Coast District Health Board, Wellington, New Zealand.

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Oct;33(5):841-847. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13740. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.13740
PMID:33599054
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess validity of the STUMBL score in New Zealand for complications of blunt chest trauma without multi-trauma and immediate life-threatening injuries.

METHODS

A multi-centre, retrospective observational study was carried out in five EDs. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for all, early and late complications and ethnic sub-groups. Youden Index generated for each ROC was used to indicate cut scores for risks of complication, ICU admission, prolonged length of stay (LOS) and mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 445 patients were included. AUROC for all complications composite were (0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-0.77), mortality (0.92, 95% CI 0.89-0.94), ICU admissions (0.78, 95% CI 0.73-0.81) and prolonged LOS (0.80, 95% CI 0.76-0.83) were calculated. The score performed better in the New Zealand European (Pākehā) sub-group compared to Māori and Pasifika (AUROC [95% CI]: 0.80 [0.73-0.85], 0.69 [0.56-0.79], 0.66 [0.46-0.82], respectively). Patients with scores >12 were at risk of complications from blunt chest trauma, >15 at risk of prolonged LOS and >18 at risk of ICU admission and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The STUMBL score at a cut-off of <12 did not predict all complications sufficiently well to recommend for general use in our population. However, a score >15 predicted prolonged LOS and a score >18 predicted mortality sufficiently to be clinically useful for these outcomes. The score is more accurate in New Zealand Pākehā and needs to be used with caution in Māori and Pasifika populations. A larger prospective validation is required to further assess the score.

摘要

目的

评估 STUMBL 评分在新西兰用于无多发伤和即时生命威胁性损伤的钝性胸部创伤并发症的有效性。

方法

在五家急诊室进行了一项多中心、回顾性观察性研究。计算了所有、早期和晚期并发症以及种族亚组的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUROC)。每个 ROC 的约登指数用于指示并发症、入住 ICU、延长住院时间(LOS)和死亡率风险的截断分数。

结果

共纳入 445 例患者。所有并发症综合的 AUROC 为(0.73,95%置信区间[CI]0.68-0.77),死亡率(0.92,95%CI0.89-0.94),ICU 入院(0.78,95%CI0.73-0.81)和延长 LOS(0.80,95%CI0.76-0.83)。该评分在新西兰欧洲裔(Pākehā)亚组中的表现优于毛利人和太平洋岛民(AUROC[95%CI]:0.80[0.73-0.85]、0.69[0.56-0.79]、0.66[0.46-0.82])。评分>12 分的患者有发生钝性胸部创伤并发症的风险,评分>15 分的患者有延长 LOS 的风险,评分>18 分的患者有入住 ICU 和死亡的风险。

结论

STUMBL 评分在截断值<12 时未能充分预测所有并发症,不推荐在我们的人群中常规使用。然而,评分>15 分可预测延长 LOS,评分>18 分可预测死亡率,对于这些结果具有足够的临床实用性。该评分在新西兰欧洲裔中更为准确,在毛利人和太平洋岛民中使用时需要谨慎。需要更大规模的前瞻性验证来进一步评估该评分。

相似文献

1
Retrospective validation of a risk stratification tool developed for the management of patients with blunt chest trauma (the STUMBL score).回顾性验证一种用于管理钝性胸部创伤患者的风险分层工具(STUMBL 评分)。
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Oct;33(5):841-847. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13740. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
2
The clinical effectiveness of the STUMBL score for the management of ED patients with blunt chest trauma compared to clinical evaluation alone.STUMBL 评分在管理钝性胸部创伤 ED 患者方面的临床效果与单独临床评估相比。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;17(6):1785-1793. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03001-0. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
3
A retrospective validation study of the STUMBL score for emergency department patients with blunt thoracic trauma.一项针对急诊科钝性胸部创伤患者的STUMBL评分回顾性验证研究。
Injury. 2023 Jan;54(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
4
Scoping review of the literature to ascertain how the STUMBL Score clinical prediction model is used to manage patients with blunt chest wall trauma in emergency care.对文献进行范围综述,以确定 STUMBL 评分临床预测模型在急诊中用于管理钝性胸壁创伤患者的具体情况。
Injury. 2023 Jul;54(7):110796. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.027. Epub 2023 May 7.
5
Appraisal of early evaluation of blunt chest trauma: development of a standardized scoring system for initial clinical decision making.钝性胸部创伤早期评估的评价:用于初始临床决策的标准化评分系统的开发
J Trauma. 2000 Sep;49(3):496-504. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200009000-00018.
6
A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial.一项评估用于处理钝性胸部创伤患者的预后模型的影响的多中心随机可行性研究:STUMBL 试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 26;9(7):e029187. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029187.
7
The clinical effectiveness of the STUMBL score for the management of ED patients with blunt chest trauma compared to clinical evaluation alone: comment.与单纯临床评估相比,STUMBL评分在急诊钝性胸部创伤患者管理中的临床有效性:评论
Intern Emerg Med. 2023 Jan;18(1):337-338. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03082-x. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
8
Comparison of different thoracic trauma scoring systems in regards to prediction of post-traumatic complications and outcome in blunt chest trauma.不同胸外伤评分系统在预测钝性胸部外伤后创伤并发症和结局方面的比较。
J Surg Res. 2012 Jul;176(1):239-47. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.09.018. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
9
Predicting outcomes after blunt chest wall trauma: development and external validation of a new prognostic model.钝性胸壁创伤后预后的预测:一种新的预后模型的开发与外部验证
Crit Care. 2014 May 14;18(3):R98. doi: 10.1186/cc13873.
10
Clinical Outcome of Urgent Thoracotomy in Patients with Penetrating and Blunt Chest Trauma: A Retrospective Survey.穿透性和钝性胸部创伤患者紧急开胸手术的临床结果:一项回顾性调查
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Nov;66(8):686-692. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1608899. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical prediction models for the management of blunt chest trauma in the emergency department: a systematic review.临床预测模型在急诊科钝性胸部创伤管理中的应用:系统评价。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 12;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01107-6.
2
Analgesia for rib fractures: a narrative review.肋骨骨折的镇痛:叙述性综述。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Apr;71(4):535-547. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02725-1. Epub 2024 Mar 8.