• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对急诊科钝性胸部创伤患者的STUMBL评分回顾性验证研究。

A retrospective validation study of the STUMBL score for emergency department patients with blunt thoracic trauma.

作者信息

Giamello Jacopo Davide, Martini Gianpiero, Prato Davide, Santoro Marco, Arese Ylenia, Melchio Remo, Bertolaccini Luca, Battle Ceri Elisabeth, Driscoll Timothy, Sciolla Andrea, Lauria Giuseppe

机构信息

School of Emergency Medicine, University of Turin; Department of Emergency Medicine, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.

出版信息

Injury. 2023 Jan;54(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.028
PMID:36028375
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Blunt thoracic trauma (BTT) is a leading cause of emergency department (ED) trauma-related attendance. Risk prediction tools are commonly to predict patients' outcomes and assign them to the most appropriate care setting. The STUMBL score is a prognostic model for BTT, derived and validated in the United Kingdom; items comprising the score are age, number of rib fractures, use of pre-injury anticoagulants, chronic lung disease and oxygen saturation levels. This study's aim was to validate the STUMBL score in an Italian ED.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective validation study was conducted in the ED of Santa Croce and Carle hub hospital in Cuneo, north-western Italy. All patients with an ED attendance for isolated BTT from 2018 to 2021 were included. Exclusion criteria were an age of under eighteen and the presence of any immediately life-threatening lesion. The primary outcome was the development of trauma-related complications, defined by the occurrence of one or more of the following: in-hospital mortality, pulmonary complications (infection, pleural effusion, haemothorax, pneumothorax, pleural empyema), need for intensive care unit admission, hospital length of stay equal to or greater than seven days. The performance of the STUMBL score was analysed in terms of discrimination with the evaluation of the receiver operating characteristic curve and calibration with the Hosmer-Lemeshow test and with the calibration belt.

RESULTS

745 patients were enroled (median age 64 [25th;75th percentile: 50;78], male/female ratio 1:4, median Charlson comorbidity index 2 [1;4], median STUMBL score 11 [6;17]). 65.2% of patients were discharged home after ED evaluation. 203 patients (27.2%) developed the primary outcome. The STUMBL score was significantly different in patients with complications compared to those without complications (9 [5;13] vs 21 [17;25], p < 0.001). The C index of the score for the primary outcome was 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.93), and the result of the Hosmer-Lemeshow test was 9.01 (p = 0.34). STUMBL score = 16 has a sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI 0.75-0.85), specificity of 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.90), a positive predictive value of 0.70 (95% CI 0.64-0.76), and a negative predictive value of 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94).

CONCLUSION

In this validation study, the STUMBL score demonstrated excellent discrimination and calibration in predicting the outcome of patients attending the ED with a BTT.

摘要

引言

钝性胸部创伤(BTT)是急诊科(ED)创伤相关就诊的主要原因。风险预测工具通常用于预测患者的预后,并将他们分配到最合适的护理环境。STUMBL评分是一种针对BTT的预后模型,在英国得出并经过验证;构成该评分的项目包括年龄、肋骨骨折数量、伤前抗凝剂的使用、慢性肺病和血氧饱和度水平。本研究的目的是在意大利的急诊科验证STUMBL评分。

方法

这项单中心回顾性验证研究在意大利西北部库内奥的圣十字与卡尔莱枢纽医院的急诊科进行。纳入了2018年至2021年因单纯BTT到急诊科就诊的所有患者。排除标准为年龄未满18岁以及存在任何立即危及生命的损伤。主要结局是创伤相关并发症的发生,定义为出现以下一种或多种情况:院内死亡、肺部并发症(感染、胸腔积液、血胸、气胸、脓胸)、需要入住重症监护病房、住院时间等于或大于7天。通过评估受试者工作特征曲线分析STUMBL评分的辨别能力,并通过Hosmer-Lemeshow检验和校准带进行校准。

结果

共纳入745例患者(中位年龄64岁[第25;75百分位数:50;78],男女比例1:4,中位Charlson合并症指数2[1;4],中位STUMBL评分11[6;17])。65.2%的患者在急诊科评估后出院回家。203例患者(27.2%)出现了主要结局。出现并发症的患者与未出现并发症的患者相比,STUMBL评分有显著差异(9[5;13]对21[17;25],p<0.001)。主要结局评分的C指数为0.90(95%可信区间0.88 - 0.93),Hosmer-Lemeshow检验结果为9.01(p = 0.34)。STUMBL评分为16时,灵敏度为0.80(95%可信区间0.75 - 0.85),特异度为0.87(95%可信区间0.84 - 0.90),阳性预测值为0.70(95%可信区间0.64 - 0.76),阴性预测值为0.92(95%可信区间0.90 - 0.94)。

结论

在这项验证研究中,STUMBL评分在预测因BTT到急诊科就诊患者的预后方面显示出出色的辨别能力和校准能力。

相似文献

1
A retrospective validation study of the STUMBL score for emergency department patients with blunt thoracic trauma.一项针对急诊科钝性胸部创伤患者的STUMBL评分回顾性验证研究。
Injury. 2023 Jan;54(1):39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.028. Epub 2022 Aug 14.
2
Retrospective validation of the STUMBL score in a Level 1 trauma centre.STUMBL评分在一级创伤中心的回顾性验证
Injury. 2025 May;56(5):112088. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.112088. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
3
The clinical effectiveness of the STUMBL score for the management of ED patients with blunt chest trauma compared to clinical evaluation alone.STUMBL 评分在管理钝性胸部创伤 ED 患者方面的临床效果与单独临床评估相比。
Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Sep;17(6):1785-1793. doi: 10.1007/s11739-022-03001-0. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
4
Scoping review of the literature to ascertain how the STUMBL Score clinical prediction model is used to manage patients with blunt chest wall trauma in emergency care.对文献进行范围综述,以确定 STUMBL 评分临床预测模型在急诊中用于管理钝性胸壁创伤患者的具体情况。
Injury. 2023 Jul;54(7):110796. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.05.027. Epub 2023 May 7.
5
A multicentre randomised feasibility STUdy evaluating the impact of a prognostic model for Management of BLunt chest wall trauma patients: STUMBL Trial.一项评估用于处理钝性胸部创伤患者的预后模型的影响的多中心随机可行性研究:STUMBL 试验。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 26;9(7):e029187. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029187.
6
Retrospective validation of a risk stratification tool developed for the management of patients with blunt chest trauma (the STUMBL score).回顾性验证一种用于管理钝性胸部创伤患者的风险分层工具(STUMBL 评分)。
Emerg Med Australas. 2021 Oct;33(5):841-847. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.13740. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
7
Retrospective evaluation of the BIG score to predict mortality in pediatric blunt trauma.回顾性评估 BIG 评分对儿科钝性创伤患者死亡率的预测价值。
CJEM. 2018 Jul;20(4):592-599. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.379. Epub 2017 Aug 14.
8
Prognostic prediction tools and clinician communication: a qualitative study of the effect of the STUMBL tool on clinical practice.预后预测工具和临床医生沟通:STUMBL 工具对临床实践影响的定性研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2020 May 11;20(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00331-0.
9
Predicting outcomes after blunt chest wall trauma: development and external validation of a new prognostic model.钝性胸壁创伤后预后的预测:一种新的预后模型的开发与外部验证
Crit Care. 2014 May 14;18(3):R98. doi: 10.1186/cc13873.
10
Appraisal of early evaluation of blunt chest trauma: development of a standardized scoring system for initial clinical decision making.钝性胸部创伤早期评估的评价:用于初始临床决策的标准化评分系统的开发
J Trauma. 2000 Sep;49(3):496-504. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200009000-00018.

引用本文的文献

1
Regional anaesthesia techniques for management of severe chest wall trauma: a major trauma centre retrospective observational study.用于严重胸壁创伤管理的区域麻醉技术:一项大型创伤中心回顾性观察研究
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 May 12;51(1):200. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02818-6.
2
Clinical prediction models for the management of blunt chest trauma in the emergency department: a systematic review.临床预测模型在急诊科钝性胸部创伤管理中的应用:系统评价。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 12;24(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01107-6.
3
Analgesia for rib fractures: a narrative review.
肋骨骨折的镇痛:叙述性综述。
Can J Anaesth. 2024 Apr;71(4):535-547. doi: 10.1007/s12630-024-02725-1. Epub 2024 Mar 8.