Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, United States.
J Health Commun. 2021 Jan 2;26(1):28-38. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2021.1879320. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
This study presents data from a content analysis of original research articles published in () and () from 2010 to 2019. The authors coded 2,050 articles using categories that identified health topics, theory, population characteristics, and methods used in each study. Distinctions between the published research in and are highlighted. Across both journals, articles are primarily conducted within the United States, most frequently use college student samples, often lack explicit theoretical frameworks, heavily rely on online survey methods, and most commonly use quantitative methodologies. The most frequently utilized theory across both journals wasSocial Cognitive Theory and the most studied health topic were behaviors related to smoking, tobacco, and e-cigarette use. The journals were significantly different in several areas, with containing more articles explicitly guided by theory and publishing more qualitative research, while had more racial diversity in its study samples. Results are discussed in terms of their implications for future research. Increased diversity in methodology and samples, as well as increased use of theory and continued use of interdisciplinary collaborations among researchers will allow for expanding and enhancing health communication knowledge going forward.
本研究对 2010 年至 2019 年发表在《健康传播》和《美国健康传播杂志》上的原创研究文章进行了内容分析。作者使用了识别每个研究中健康主题、理论、人口特征和方法的类别对 2050 篇文章进行了编码。强调了这两个期刊上发表的研究之间的区别。在这两个期刊上,文章主要在美国进行,最常使用大学生样本,通常缺乏明确的理论框架,严重依赖在线调查方法,并且最常使用定量方法。两个期刊中使用最多的理论是社会认知理论,研究最多的健康主题是与吸烟、烟草和电子烟使用相关的行为。这两个期刊在几个方面存在显著差异,其中 期刊有更多的文章明确受到理论的指导,并发表了更多的定性研究,而 期刊在研究样本中具有更多的种族多样性。结果讨论了其对未来研究的意义。在方法和样本方面增加多样性,以及更多地使用理论和继续在研究人员之间进行跨学科合作,将有助于未来扩展和加强健康传播知识。