• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

短种植体(≤6 毫米)修复严重下颌骨萎缩:系统评价。

Short Dental Implants (≤ 6 mm) to Rehabilitate Severe Mandibular Atrophy: A Systematic Review.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jan-Feb;36(1):30-37. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8510.

DOI:10.11607/jomi.8510
PMID:33600520
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess the survival rate, marginal bone levels, and prosthetic success of short implants when placed in posterior areas of severely reabsorbed mandibles.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was performed of all randomized controlled trials with at least 10 patients with a control group where bone augmentations were performed that were published between January 2015 and February 2020. From 77 pertinent studies, 14 full-text publications were studied, and 6 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

The implant survival rates of short dental implants ranged from 92% to 96.9% with a follow-up from 1 to 5 years, and the prosthetic success rate ranged from 90% to 100% during the same follow-up. The mean marginal bone level values of involved short implants ranged from -0.51 to -2.30 mm.

CONCLUSION

The obtained data showed that short dental implants are a valid therapeutic choice to rehabilitate severe mandibular atrophy in the medium to long term.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在后牙区严重吸收下颌骨中植入短种植体的存活率、边缘骨水平和修复体成功率。

材料和方法

对 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月期间发表的所有随机对照试验进行了系统回顾,这些试验均至少有 10 名患者为对照组,且对照组患者进行了骨增量手术。在 77 篇相关研究中,研究了 14 篇全文出版物,其中 6 项研究符合纳入标准。

结果

短牙种植体的种植体存活率为 92%至 96.9%,随访时间为 1 至 5 年,同期的修复体成功率为 90%至 100%。受影响的短种植体的平均边缘骨水平值为-0.51 至-2.30 毫米。

结论

获得的数据表明,短牙种植体是从中长期角度修复严重下颌骨萎缩的有效治疗选择。

相似文献

1
Short Dental Implants (≤ 6 mm) to Rehabilitate Severe Mandibular Atrophy: A Systematic Review.短种植体(≤6 毫米)修复严重下颌骨萎缩:系统评价。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Jan-Feb;36(1):30-37. doi: 10.11607/jomi.8510.
2
Key factors influencing short implant success.影响短种植体成功的关键因素。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Sep;24(3):263-275. doi: 10.1007/s10006-020-00841-y. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
3
Immediate Loading of Fixed Partial Dental Prostheses on Extra-Short and Short Implants in Patients with Severe Atrophy of the Posterior Maxilla or Mandible: An Up-to-4-year Clinical Study.即刻负载固定修复体于严重上颌或下颌后牙区牙槽骨萎缩的短种植体:一项长达 4 年的临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020 May/Jun;35(3):607-615. doi: 10.11607/jomi.7943.
4
Rehabilitation of reabsorbed maxillae with implants in buttresses in patients with combination syndrome.联合综合征患者采用植入支抗骨内种植体修复吸收性上颌骨
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):e322-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.012.
5
Evaluation of the survival rate of short implants placed in the posterior atrophic mandible: 5-year clinical study.短种植体在后萎缩下颌骨中的存活率评估:5 年临床研究。
Quintessence Int. 2022 Aug 17;53(8):690-696. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b3095013.
6
Tilted implants for the restoration of posterior mandibles with horizontal atrophy: an alternative treatment.用于修复水平向萎缩的下颌后牙区的倾斜种植体:一种替代治疗方法。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013 May;71(5):856-64. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.12.016. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
7
Peri-implant Tissues and Patient Satisfaction After Treatment of Vertically Augmented Atrophic Posterior Mandibles with Intraoral Onlay Block Bone Grafts: A Retrospective 3-Year Case Series Follow-up Study.采用口内嵌体块状骨移植治疗垂直性骨增量萎缩后下颌骨后的种植体周围组织及患者满意度:一项为期3年的回顾性病例系列随访研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 Jan/Feb;33(1):137-144. doi: 10.11607/jomi.4490.
8
The extremely resorbed mandible, 10-year results of a randomized controlled trial on 3 treatment strategies.极度吸收的下颌骨,三种治疗策略随机对照试验的10年结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Aug;25(8):926-32. doi: 10.1111/clr.12184. Epub 2013 May 3.
9
Implant treatment in atrophic posterior mandibles: vertical regeneration with block bone grafts versus implants with 5.5-mm intrabony length.后牙区萎缩性下颌骨的种植治疗:块状骨移植的垂直再生与 5.5mm 骨内长度种植体的比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014 May-Jun;29(3):659-66. doi: 10.11607/jomi.3262.
10
Clinical Success of Dental Implants Placed in Posterior Mandible Augmented With Interpositional Block Graft: 3-Year Results From a Prospective Cohort Clinical Study.采用间置块状植骨术增量的下颌后牙区种植体的临床成功率:一项前瞻性队列临床研究的3年结果
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019 Feb;77(2):289-298. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2018.09.031. Epub 2018 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Occlusal Force and Masticatory Performance in Female Patients Who Selected Implant Treatment for a Missing Mandibular Second Molar: A Retrospective Study.选择种植修复下颌第二磨牙缺失的女性患者的咬合力和咀嚼性能特征:一项回顾性研究
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Jun 5;16(6):211. doi: 10.3390/jfb16060211.
2
Comparative analysis of implant survival, peri-implant health, and patient satisfaction among three treatment modalities in atrophic posterior mandibles: a randomized clinical study.萎缩性下颌后牙区三种治疗方式种植体存留率、种植体周围健康状况及患者满意度的比较分析:一项随机临床研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jun 7;25(1):939. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06286-7.
3
Exploring Non-conventional Dental Implants Beyond Traditional Paradigms Part I: Bridging the Gap in Bone Deficiency Cases.
探索超越传统模式的非传统牙种植体 第一部分:弥补骨缺损病例的差距
Cureus. 2024 Nov 22;16(11):e74271. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74271. eCollection 2024 Nov.
4
Clinical Evaluation of Short (6 mm) and Longer Implants Placed Side by Side in Posterior Partially Edentulous Area: A 3-Year Observational Study.在后牙部分牙列缺损区域并排植入短(6毫米)种植体和较长种植体的临床评价:一项3年观察性研究。
Int J Dent. 2023 Jul 7;2023:9086628. doi: 10.1155/2023/9086628. eCollection 2023.
5
Short implants compared to regular dental implants after bone augmentation in the atrophic posterior mandible: umbrella review and meta-analysis of success outcomes.短种植体与常规种植体在后萎缩性下颌骨骨增量后的比较:成功结局的伞式综述和荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Jul 4;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00476-0.
6
Retrospective Evaluation of Implants Placed in Iliac Crest Autografts and Pristine Bone.对置于髂嵴自体骨和原始骨中的种植体的回顾性评估。
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 2;11(5):1367. doi: 10.3390/jcm11051367.
7
Clinical performance of short versus standard dental implants in vertically augmented bone: an overview of systematic reviews.短种植体与标准种植体在垂直骨增量中临床效果的系统评价概述。
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Nov;25(11):6045-6068. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04095-0. Epub 2021 Aug 16.