Suppr超能文献

短期接触臭氧、二氧化氮和二氧化硫与因哮喘导致的急诊就诊和住院治疗:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Short-term exposure to ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and sulphur dioxide and emergency department visits and hospital admissions due to asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Institute of Non-communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Guangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangdong, China.

Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia San Nicolás, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional (CONICET), San Nicolás, Argentina.

出版信息

Environ Int. 2021 May;150:106435. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106435. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Air pollution is a major environmental hazard to human health and a leading cause of morbidity for asthma worldwide.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the current evidence on short-term effects (from several hours to 7 days) of exposure to ozone (O), nitrogen dioxide (NO), and sulphur dioxide (SO) on asthma exacerbations, defined as emergency room visits (ERVs) and hospital admissions (HAs).

METHODS

We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and other electronic databases to retrieve studies that investigated the risk of asthma-related ERVs and HAs associated with short-term exposure to O, NO, or SO. We evaluated the risks of bias (RoB) for individual studies and the certainty of evidence for each pollutant in the overall analysis. A subgroup analysis was performed, stratified by sex, age, and type of asthma exacerbation. We conducted sensitivity analysis by excluding the studies with high RoB and based on the E-value. Publication bias was examined with the Egger's test and with funnel plots.

RESULTS

Our literature search retrieved 9,059 articles, and finally 67 studies were included, from which 48 studies included the data on children, 21 on adults, 14 on the elderly, and 31 on the general population. Forty-three studies included data on asthma ERVs, and 25 on asthma HAs. The pooled relative risk (RR) per 10 µg/m increase of ambient concentrations was 1.008 (95%CI: 1.005, 1.011) for maximum 8-hour daily or average 24-hour O, 1.014 (95%CI: 1.008, 1.020) for average 24-hour NO, 1.010 (95%CI: 1.001, 1.020) for 24-hour SO, 1.017 (95%CI: 0.973, 1.063) for maximum 1-hour daily O, 0.999 (95%CI: 0.966, 1.033) for 1-hour NO, and 1.003 (95%CI: 0.992, 1.014) for 1-hour SO. Heterogeneity was observed in all pollutants except for 8-hour or 24-hour O and 24-hour NO. In general, we found no significant differences between subgroups that can explain this heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis based on the RoB showed certain differences in NO and SO when considering the outcome or confounding domains, but the analysis using the E-value showed that no unmeasured confounders were expected. There was no major evidence of publication bias. Based on the adaptation of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation, the certainty of evidence was high for 8-hour or 24-hour O and 24-hour NO, moderate for 24-hour SO, 1-hour O, and 1-hour SO, and low for 1-hour NO.

CONCLUSION

Short-term exposure to daily O, NO, and SO was associated with an increased risk of asthma exacerbation in terms of asthma-associated ERVs and HAs.

摘要

背景

空气污染是对人类健康的主要环境危害,也是全球哮喘发病率的主要原因。

目的

评估臭氧(O)、二氧化氮(NO)和二氧化硫(SO)短期暴露(数小时至 7 天)对哮喘恶化(定义为急诊室就诊(ERV)和住院(HA))的短期影响的现有证据。

方法

我们搜索了 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE 和其他电子数据库,以检索研究哮喘相关 ERV 和 HA 与 O、NO 或 SO 短期暴露相关的风险。我们评估了个体研究的偏倚风险(RoB)和整体分析中每种污染物的证据确定性。进行了亚组分析,按性别、年龄和哮喘恶化类型分层。我们通过排除 RoB 较高的研究和基于 E 值的敏感性分析来进行分析。使用 Egger 检验和漏斗图检查发表偏倚。

结果

我们的文献检索共检索到 9059 篇文章,最终纳入了 67 项研究,其中 48 项研究纳入了儿童数据,21 项研究纳入了成人数据,14 项研究纳入了老年人数据,31 项研究纳入了一般人群数据。43 项研究纳入了哮喘 ERV 数据,25 项研究纳入了哮喘 HA 数据。环境浓度每增加 10µg/m3,最大 8 小时每日或平均 24 小时 O 的相对风险(RR)为 1.008(95%CI:1.005,1.011),平均 24 小时 NO 为 1.014(95%CI:1.008,1.020),24 小时 SO 为 1.010(95%CI:1.001,1.020),最大 1 小时每日 O 为 1.017(95%CI:0.973,1.063),1 小时 NO 为 0.999(95%CI:0.966,1.033),1 小时 SO 为 1.003(95%CI:0.992,1.014)。所有污染物均存在异质性,除 8 小时或 24 小时 O 和 24 小时 NO 外。一般来说,我们没有发现可以解释这种异质性的亚组之间的显著差异。基于 RoB 的敏感性分析表明,在考虑结果或混杂因素时,NO 和 SO 存在某些差异,但基于 E 值的分析表明,预计不存在未测量的混杂因素。没有重大的出版偏倚证据。根据推荐评估、制定和评估的分级标准,8 小时或 24 小时 O 和 24 小时 NO 的证据确定性较高,24 小时 SO、1 小时 O 和 1 小时 SO 的证据确定性为中等,1 小时 NO 的证据确定性较低。

结论

每日 O、NO 和 SO 的短期暴露与哮喘相关 ERV 和 HA 相关的哮喘恶化风险增加有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验