School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing, China.
CAS Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
J Affect Disord. 2021 Mar 1;282:836-839. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.12.060. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic has become a global public health event. Medical staff around the world are nervously responding to the crisis, and their mental health problems deserve attention. To better know the differences in the mental health status between frontier-line and non-frontier-line medical staff. This study used the Child PTSD Symptom Scale, the Self-Rating Depression Scale, the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale and the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale to examine the PTSD, depression, anxiety and resilience among 162 frontier-line medical workers and 163 non-frontier-line medical workers in China. The results showed that all negative factor scores of non-frontier-line medical staff seemed to be worse than those of frontier-line medical staff, and the positive factor scores were the opposite through descriptive analysis, independent sample t-test and Chi-square test. Some psychological effects and theories were used to explain this phenomenon. Intervention suggestions for medical staff and future research directions were discussed.
新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情已成为全球公共卫生事件。世界各地的医务人员正在紧张应对这场危机,他们的心理健康问题值得关注。为了更好地了解前线和非前线医务人员心理健康状况的差异,本研究使用儿童创伤后应激障碍症状量表、抑郁自评量表、焦虑自评量表和 Connor-Davidson 韧性量表,对中国 162 名前线医务人员和 163 名非前线医务人员进行了 PTSD、抑郁、焦虑和韧性的测试。结果表明,通过描述性分析、独立样本 t 检验和卡方检验,非前线医务人员的所有负性因素得分似乎都比前线医务人员差,而正性因素得分则相反。本文用一些心理效应和理论来解释这种现象,并讨论了对医务人员的干预建议和未来的研究方向。