National Kidney Foundation, New York, New York, USA.
Department of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2021 Sep;24(10):1497-1504. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0690. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
Not all treatments are appropriate for all individuals with kidney failure (KF). Studies suggest that conversations surrounding end-of-life decisions occur too late or not at all. The aim of this research was to identify perceived barriers to such discussions among nephrologists and nephrology fellows to determine if barriers differ by experience level. Phase I consisted of semistructured telephone interviews with nephrologists and fellows. Phase II included focus groups with nominal group technique in which providers ranked barriers to discussions about not initiating/withholding dialysis (NIWD) or discontinuing dialysis (DD). U.S. community-based nephrologists and nephrology fellows. Seven interviews were conducted with each group ( = 14) in phase I. Many barriers cited were similar among providers, however, differences were related to fellows' position as trainees citing the "reaction of their attending/supervising physician or other providers" as a barrier to NIWD and "lacking their attending physician's support" as a barrier to DD. Six focus groups were conducted, nephrologists ( = 22) and fellows ( = 18), in phase II. The highest ranked barrier to NIWD for nephrologists was "discordant opinions among patient and family"; fellows ranked "time to hold conversation" highest. Nephrologists' highest barrier to DD was the "finality of the decision (death)"; fellows ranked the "inertia of the clinical encounter" highest. Capturing the perspectives of nephrologists and fellows concerning the barriers to conservative management of patients with KF may inform the development of targeted education/training interventions by experience level focused on communication skills, conflict resolution, and negotiation.
并非所有治疗方法都适用于所有肾衰竭(KF)患者。研究表明,有关生命末期决策的讨论要么发生得太晚,要么根本没有发生。本研究旨在确定肾病专家和肾病研究员在讨论此类问题时所认为的障碍,以确定经验水平是否存在差异。第一阶段包括对肾病专家和研究员进行半结构化电话访谈。第二阶段包括使用名义群体技术进行焦点小组讨论,其中提供者对有关不开始/停止透析(NIWD)或停止透析(DD)的讨论的障碍进行了排名。美国社区为基础的肾病专家和肾病研究员。第一阶段对每组进行了 7 次访谈( = 14)。尽管提供者之间引用了许多相似的障碍,但差异与研究员作为受训者的立场有关,他们将“主治医生/监督医生或其他提供者的反应”作为 NIWD 的障碍,并将“缺乏主治医生的支持”作为 DD 的障碍。第二阶段进行了六次焦点小组讨论,包括肾病专家( = 22)和研究员( = 18)。肾病专家认为 NIWD 的最高障碍是“患者和家属之间意见不一致”;研究员将“进行对话的时间”列为最高障碍。肾病专家 DD 的最高障碍是“决策的最终性(死亡)”;研究员将“临床遇到的惯性”列为最高障碍。了解肾病专家和研究员对 KF 患者保守治疗障碍的看法,可能有助于根据经验水平制定有针对性的教育/培训干预措施,重点是沟通技巧、冲突解决和谈判。