• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Minding the treatment gap: results of the Singapore Mental Health Study.关注治疗差距:新加坡心理健康研究的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;55(11):1415-1424. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01748-0. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
2
Tracking the mental health of a nation: prevalence and correlates of mental disorders in the second Singapore mental health study.追踪国民的心理健康:新加坡第二次心理健康研究中的精神障碍患病率及相关因素。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Apr 5;29:e29. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000179.
3
Prevalence and comorbidity of migraine headache: results from the Singapore Mental Health Study 2016.偏头痛患病率和共病情况:来自 2016 年新加坡心理健康研究的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Jan;55(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01755-1. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
4
Obsessive--compulsive disorder: prevalence, correlates, help-seeking and quality of life in a multiracial Asian population.强迫症:在多民族亚洲人群中的流行率、相关性、寻求帮助和生活质量。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2012 Dec;47(12):2035-43. doi: 10.1007/s00127-012-0507-8. Epub 2012 Apr 17.
5
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Singapore: Prevalence, Comorbidity, Quality of Life and Social Support.新加坡强迫症:流行率、共病、生活质量和社会支持。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2020 Jan;49(1):15-25.
6
Treatment gap in common mental disorders: the Singapore perspective.常见精神障碍治疗差距:新加坡视角。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2012 Jun;21(2):195-202. doi: 10.1017/S2045796011000771.
7
Validity of the Associated Symptom Criteria for Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Observations From the Singapore Mental Health Study.广泛性焦虑障碍相关症状标准的效度:来自新加坡精神健康研究的观察
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 May;205(5):390-396. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000608.
8
A population-based survey of mental disorders in Singapore.新加坡基于人群的精神障碍调查。
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2012 Feb;41(2):49-66.
9
Prevalence and correlates of generalized anxiety disorder in Singapore: Results from the second Singapore Mental Health Study.新加坡广泛性焦虑障碍的患病率及其相关因素:来自新加坡第二次精神健康研究的结果。
J Anxiety Disord. 2019 Aug;66:102106. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2019.102106. Epub 2019 May 31.
10
Impact of mental disorders and chronic physical conditions on quality-adjusted life years in Singapore.精神障碍和慢性躯体疾病对新加坡调整后生命质量年的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 14;10(1):2695. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59604-0.

引用本文的文献

1
A PERMA-nent solution to understanding psychological wellbeing? Exploring the utility of the PERMA model in a university workplace.理解心理健康的永久解决方案?探索PERMA模型在大学工作场所的效用。
Front Psychol. 2025 Jul 23;16:1598910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1598910. eCollection 2025.
2
Perceptions of mental health literacy, stigma, empathy, and confidence in managing patients with psychiatric disorders among doctors and nurses working in a Singapore emergency department.新加坡急诊科医生和护士对精神卫生素养、污名、同理心以及管理精神疾病患者的信心的认知。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Aug 1;25(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01290-0.
3
Factor structure and predictors of causal beliefs about seven mental illnesses among the Singapore general population.新加坡普通人群中对七种精神疾病因果信念的因素结构及预测因素
Front Public Health. 2025 Jul 9;13:1612820. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612820. eCollection 2025.
4
Barriers underlying care gaps in Singapore's mental health landscape and suggestions for improvement from service providers' perspectives: a qualitative approach.新加坡心理健康领域护理差距的潜在障碍以及服务提供者视角下的改进建议:一种定性研究方法
Front Public Health. 2025 May 19;13:1527521. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1527521. eCollection 2025.
5
The epidemiology and burden of ten mental disorders in countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), 1990-2021: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.1990 - 2021年东南亚国家联盟(东盟)各国十种精神障碍的流行病学与负担:全球疾病负担研究2021的结果
Lancet Public Health. 2025 Jun;10(6):e480-e491. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(25)00098-2.
6
The impact of performing arts on mental health, social connection, and creativity in university students: a Randomised Controlled Trial.表演艺术对大学生心理健康、社会联系和创造力的影响:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 2;25(1):1628. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22552-3.
7
Sociocultural context of SMART recovery in Singapore: A qualitative exploration of members and facilitators perspectives and experiences.新加坡智能康复的社会文化背景:对成员和促进者观点及经历的定性探索
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2025 May;44(4):961-974. doi: 10.1111/dar.14048. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
8
Fighting against self-stigma in adults with self-reported diagnosis of OCD: A single-arm pilot study using a mobile app-based intervention.对自我报告诊断为强迫症的成年人进行自我污名化抗争:一项使用基于移动应用程序干预的单臂试点研究。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2025 Sep;64(3):788-805. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12537. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
9
Depression Self-Care Apps' Characteristics and Applicability to Older Adults: Systematic Assessment.抑郁症自我护理应用程序的特点及其对老年人的适用性:系统评估
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 21;27:e56418. doi: 10.2196/56418.
10
Utilization of mental health services and associated factors among residents of southern Ethiopia; a community based cross-sectional study.埃塞俄比亚南部居民心理健康服务的利用情况及相关因素;一项基于社区的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 15;25(1):259. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12400-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Tracking the mental health of a nation: prevalence and correlates of mental disorders in the second Singapore mental health study.追踪国民的心理健康:新加坡第二次心理健康研究中的精神障碍患病率及相关因素。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Apr 5;29:e29. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000179.
2
Functioning mediates help-seeking for mental problems in the general population.功能障碍在普通人群中对寻求精神问题的帮助起中介作用。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Oct;54:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.06.009. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
Do mental health mobile apps work: evidence and recommendations for designing high-efficacy mental health mobile apps.心理健康移动应用程序有效吗:设计高效能心理健康移动应用程序的证据与建议。
Mhealth. 2018 Mar 23;4:6. doi: 10.21037/mhealth.2018.03.02. eCollection 2018.
4
Prevalence and predictors of no lifetime utilization of mental health treatment among people with mental disorders in France: findings from the 'Mental Health in General Population' (MHGP) survey.法国精神障碍患者一生中未使用精神卫生治疗的流行情况和预测因素:来自“一般人群精神卫生”(MHGP)调查的结果。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2018 Jun;53(6):567-576. doi: 10.1007/s00127-018-1507-0. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
5
Socio-economic variations in the mental health treatment gap for people with anxiety, mood, and substance use disorders: results from the WHO World Mental Health (WMH) surveys.社会经济因素对焦虑、心境和物质使用障碍患者心理健康治疗差距的影响:来自世卫组织世界心理健康调查的结果。
Psychol Med. 2018 Jul;48(9):1560-1571. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717003336. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
6
Stigma among Singaporean youth: a cross-sectional study on adolescent attitudes towards serious mental illness and social tolerance in a multiethnic population.新加坡青少年中的污名化现象:一项关于多民族人群中青少年对严重精神疾病态度及社会容忍度的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 16;7(10):e016432. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016432.
7
The Age of Onset of Anxiety Disorders.焦虑症的发病年龄。
Can J Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;62(4):237-246. doi: 10.1177/0706743716640757. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
8
Retrospective age-of-onset and projected lifetime prevalence of psychiatric disorders among U.S. Army National Guard soldiers.美国陆军国民警卫队士兵精神疾病的回顾性发病年龄和预计终生患病率。
J Affect Disord. 2016 Sep 15;202:171-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.025. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
Recognition of mental disorders among a multiracial population in Southeast Asia.东南亚多种族人群中心理障碍的识别。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 May 4;16:121. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0837-2.
10
Stigma towards people with mental disorders and its components - a perspective from multi-ethnic Singapore.对精神障碍患者的污名及其构成要素的看法——来自多元种族的新加坡视角。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2017 Aug;26(4):371-382. doi: 10.1017/S2045796016000159. Epub 2016 Mar 28.

关注治疗差距:新加坡心理健康研究的结果。

Minding the treatment gap: results of the Singapore Mental Health Study.

机构信息

Research Division, Institute of Mental Health, Buangkok Green Medical Park, 10 Buangkok View, Singapore, 539747, Singapore.

Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2020 Nov;55(11):1415-1424. doi: 10.1007/s00127-019-01748-0. Epub 2019 Jul 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00127-019-01748-0
PMID:31317246
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7578124/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To establish the 12-month treatment gap and its associated factors among adults with mental disorders in the Singapore resident population using data from the second Singapore Mental Health Study and to examine the changes since the last mental health survey conducted in 2010.

METHODS

6126 respondents were administered selected modules of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview, to assess major depressive disorder (MDD), dysthymia, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and alcohol use disorder (AUD) (which included alcohol abuse and dependence). Past year treatment gap was defined as the absolute difference between the prevalence of a particular mental disorder in the past 12 months preceding the interview and those who had received treatment for that disorder.

RESULTS

The prevalence of overall 12-month treatment gap in this population was high (78.6%). A multiple logistic regression analysis revealed significantly higher odds of treatment gap among those diagnosed with OCD (compared to those with MDD) and in those with a comorbid chronic physical disorder; while those who had primary education and below and those who were unemployed were less likely to have a treatment gap as compared to those with post-secondary education and those employed, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The high treatment gap in the population is concerning and highlights the need to promote help-seeking and uptake of treatment. Given the unique demographic characteristics, i.e., those with higher education and employed were more likely not to seek treatment, targeted interventions in the educational and workplace settings should be implemented.

摘要

目的

利用来自新加坡居民人群的第二次新加坡心理健康研究的数据,确定成年人精神障碍患者的 12 个月治疗差距及其相关因素,并检查自 2010 年进行上次心理健康调查以来的变化。

方法

对 6126 名受访者进行了综合国际诊断访谈的选定模块的评估,以评估重性抑郁障碍(MDD)、心境恶劣障碍、双相情感障碍、广泛性焦虑障碍(GAD)、强迫症(OCD)和酒精使用障碍(AUD)(包括酒精滥用和依赖)。过去一年的治疗差距定义为在访谈前过去 12 个月内特定精神障碍的患病率与接受该障碍治疗的患者之间的绝对差异。

结果

该人群总体 12 个月治疗差距的患病率较高(78.6%)。多因素逻辑回归分析显示,与 MDD 相比,OCD 患者(与 OCD 相比)和合并慢性躯体疾病的患者接受治疗的几率明显更高;而与接受过中学后教育和就业的患者相比,接受过小学及以下教育和失业的患者更不可能出现治疗差距。

结论

人群中较高的治疗差距令人担忧,这突显了促进寻求帮助和接受治疗的必要性。鉴于独特的人口统计学特征,即受教育程度较高和就业的人更不可能寻求治疗,应在教育和工作场所环境中实施有针对性的干预措施。