• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于犹豫模糊语言多准则决策的新冠肺炎患者疼痛治疗评估

Pain Treatment Evaluation in COVID-19 Patients with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multicriteria Decision-Making.

作者信息

Batur Sir G Didem, Sir Ender

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering, Gazi University, Ankara 06570, Turkey.

Department of Algology and Pain Medicine, Health Sciences University, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara 06010, Turkey.

出版信息

J Healthc Eng. 2021 Feb 1;2021:8831114. doi: 10.1155/2021/8831114. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.1155/2021/8831114
PMID:33604012
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7872770/
Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a worldwide pandemic since March 2020. Although most patients complain of moderate or severe pain, these symptoms are generally underestimated and appropriate treatment is not applied. This study aims to guide physicians in selecting and ranking various alternatives for the treatment of pain in COVID-19 patients. However, the choice of treatment for pain requires the consideration of many different conflicting criteria. Therefore, we have studied this problem as a multicriteria decision-making problem. Throughout the solution procedure, first, the criteria and subcriteria affecting the preferences are defined. Then, weight values are determined with respect to these criteria, as they have different degrees of importance for the problem. At this stage, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs) are used, and thus, experts can convey their ideas more accurately. In this first phase of the study, an HFLTS integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is utilized. Subsequently, possible treatment alternatives are evaluated by using the Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method. According to the results obtained by considering expert evaluations, the most preferred treatment is the administration of paracetamol, followed by interventional treatments, opioids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), respectively. With this study, it is ensured that a more accurate method is followed by eliminating possible mistakes due to the subjective evaluations of experts in the process of determining pain treatment. This method can also be used in different patient and disease groups.

摘要

自2020年3月以来,2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)已演变成一场全球大流行。尽管大多数患者抱怨有中度或重度疼痛,但这些症状通常被低估,且未得到适当治疗。本研究旨在指导医生选择和排序治疗COVID-19患者疼痛的各种替代方案。然而,疼痛治疗方案的选择需要考虑许多不同且相互冲突的标准。因此,我们将这个问题作为一个多标准决策问题来研究。在整个求解过程中,首先定义影响偏好的标准和子标准。然后,针对这些标准确定权重值,因为它们对该问题具有不同程度的重要性。在此阶段,使用犹豫模糊语言术语集(HFLTSs),这样专家可以更准确地表达他们的想法。在研究的第一阶段,采用了一种HFLTS集成层次分析法(AHP)。随后,使用理想解排序法(VIKOR)对可能的治疗方案进行评估。根据考虑专家评估得出的结果,最优选的治疗方法是服用对乙酰氨基酚,其次分别是介入治疗、阿片类药物和非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)。通过这项研究,确保了在确定疼痛治疗过程中,通过消除专家主观评估可能导致的错误,遵循一种更准确的方法。该方法也可用于不同的患者和疾病群体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc7/7872770/a06cefba205a/JHE2021-8831114.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc7/7872770/a06cefba205a/JHE2021-8831114.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4dc7/7872770/a06cefba205a/JHE2021-8831114.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Pain Treatment Evaluation in COVID-19 Patients with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multicriteria Decision-Making.基于犹豫模糊语言多准则决策的新冠肺炎患者疼痛治疗评估
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Feb 1;2021:8831114. doi: 10.1155/2021/8831114. eCollection 2021.
2
Evaluation of the COVID-19 Pandemic Intervention Strategies with Hesitant F-AHP.基于犹豫模糊层次分析法的 COVID-19 大流行干预策略评估。
J Healthc Eng. 2020 Aug 20;2020:8835258. doi: 10.1155/2020/8835258. eCollection 2020.
3
Evaluating mobile services using integrated weighting approach and fuzzy VIKOR.使用集成加权方法和模糊 VIKOR 评估移动服务。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 4;14(6):e0217786. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217786. eCollection 2019.
4
Effective allocation of resources in water pollution treatment alternatives: a multi-stage gray group decision-making method based on hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets.水污染处理方案的有效资源配置:基于犹豫模糊语言术语集的多阶段灰色群决策方法。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jan;27(3):3173-3186. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07265-6. Epub 2019 Dec 14.
5
Multicriteria Personnel Selection by the Modified Fuzzy VIKOR Method.基于改进模糊VIKOR方法的多准则人员选拔
ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:612767. doi: 10.1155/2015/612767. Epub 2015 Sep 30.
6
Evaluation of Influenza Intervention Strategies in Turkey with Fuzzy AHP-VIKOR.基于模糊层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法(FAHP-VIKOR)评价土耳其的流感干预策略
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Nov 19;2019:9486070. doi: 10.1155/2019/9486070. eCollection 2019.
7
Hesitant fuzzy linguistic multicriteria decision-making method based on generalized prioritized aggregation operator.基于广义优先聚合算子的犹豫模糊语言多准则决策方法
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:645341. doi: 10.1155/2014/645341. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
8
An integrated group decision-making method under q-rung orthopair fuzzy 2-tuple linguistic context with partial weight information.具有部分权重信息的 q 阶语言对偶模糊 2-元组情境下的综合群组决策方法。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0297462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297462. eCollection 2024.
9
Supplier selection in the industry 4.0 era by using a fuzzy cognitive map and hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR methodology.利用模糊认知图和犹豫模糊语言VIKOR方法在工业4.0时代进行供应商选择
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):52923-52942. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26004-6. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
10
Comparative Evaluation of the Treatment of COVID-19 with Multicriteria Decision-Making Techniques.运用多准则决策技术治疗 COVID-19 的对比评估。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Jan 22;2021:8864522. doi: 10.1155/2021/8864522. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
A hybrid approach based on ELECTRE III-genetic algorithm and TOPSIS method for selection of optimal COVID-19 vaccines.一种基于ELECTRE III-遗传算法和TOPSIS方法的混合方法用于选择最佳的新冠疫苗。
J Multi Criteria Decis Anal. 2022 Jan-Apr;29(1-2):80-91. doi: 10.1002/mcda.1772. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
2
Moving towards the use of artificial intelligence in pain management.迈向人工智能在疼痛管理中的应用。
Eur J Pain. 2025 Mar;29(3):e4748. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4748. Epub 2024 Nov 10.
3
Group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process by hesitant fuzzy numbers.

本文引用的文献

1
A fuzzy rough hybrid decision making technique for identifying the infected population of COVID-19.一种用于识别新冠肺炎感染人群的模糊粗糙混合决策技术。
Soft comput. 2023;27(5):2673-2683. doi: 10.1007/s00500-020-05451-0. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
COVID-19 and treatment with NSAIDs and corticosteroids: should we be limiting their use in the clinical setting?新型冠状病毒肺炎与非甾体抗炎药和皮质类固醇治疗:我们是否应在临床环境中限制其使用?
Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 Mar 30;14:1023. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1023. eCollection 2020.
3
Evaluation of Influenza Intervention Strategies in Turkey with Fuzzy AHP-VIKOR.
基于犹豫模糊数的层次分析法中的群体决策
Sci Rep. 2023 Dec 10;13(1):21864. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49076-3.
4
A fuzzy approach to support decision-making in the triage process for suspected COVID-19 patients in Brazil.一种用于支持巴西疑似新冠肺炎患者分诊过程中决策的模糊方法。
Appl Soft Comput. 2022 Nov;129:109626. doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109626. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
5
Analysis of miRNA Associated with Coronary Artery Calcification.冠状动脉钙化相关 miRNA 分析。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 25;2022:3708547. doi: 10.1155/2022/3708547. eCollection 2022.
6
Different variants of pandemic and prevention strategies: A prioritizing framework in fuzzy environment.大流行的不同变体及预防策略:模糊环境下的优先排序框架
Results Phys. 2021 Sep;28:104564. doi: 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.104564. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
7
Performance of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of Emergency System in COVID-19 Pandemic. An Extensive Narrative Review.模糊多准则决策分析在 COVID-19 大流行期间应急系统中的性能。广泛的叙述性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 14;18(10):5208. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18105208.
基于模糊层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法(FAHP-VIKOR)评价土耳其的流感干预策略
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Nov 19;2019:9486070. doi: 10.1155/2019/9486070. eCollection 2019.
4
Evaluating treatment modalities in chronic pain treatment by the multi-criteria decision making procedure.运用多准则决策程序评估慢性疼痛治疗中的治疗方式。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12911-019-0925-6.
5
Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection: Rule set database and exemplary decision support system implementation blueprints.多标准方法选择的通用框架:规则集数据库及示例性决策支持系统实施蓝图
Data Brief. 2018 Dec 12;22:639-642. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.12.015. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
Pharmacological therapy selection of type 2 diabetes based on the SWARA and modified MULTIMOORA methods under a fuzzy environment.基于模糊环境下 SWARA 和改进的 MULTIMOORA 方法的 2 型糖尿病药物治疗选择。
Artif Intell Med. 2018 May;87:20-33. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2018.03.003. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
The use of multi-criteria decision making models in evaluating anesthesia method options in circumcision surgery.多标准决策模型在评估包皮环切手术麻醉方法选择中的应用。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017 Jan 23;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0409-5.
8
CorRECTreatment: a web-based decision support tool for rectal cancer treatment that uses the analytic hierarchy process and decision tree.CorRECTreatment:一种基于网络的直肠癌治疗决策支持工具,它使用层次分析法和决策树。
Appl Clin Inform. 2015 Feb 4;6(1):56-74. doi: 10.4338/ACI-2014-10-RA-0087. eCollection 2015.
9
Risk-benefit assessment of oral phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for treatment of erectile dysfunction: a multiple criteria decision analysis.口服5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂治疗勃起功能障碍的风险效益评估:多标准决策分析
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Apr;69(4):436-43. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12548. Epub 2014 Oct 14.