• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

网络推送调查对医生调查回复率的影响:一项随机试验。

The effect of a web-push survey on physician survey responses rates: a randomized experiment.

作者信息

Delnevo Cristine D, Singh Binu

机构信息

Center for Tobacco Studies, Rutgers University New Brunswick.

出版信息

Surv Pract. 2021;14(1). doi: 10.29115/sp-2021-0001. Epub 2021 Feb 4.

DOI:10.29115/sp-2021-0001
PMID:33604202
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7889051/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Achieving a high response rate for physicians has been challenging, and with response rates declining in recent years, innovative methods are needed to increase rates. An emerging concept in survey methodology has been web-push survey delivery. With this delivery method, contact is made by mail to request a response by web. This study explored the feasibility of a web-push survey on a national sample of physicians.

METHODS

A total of 1,000 physicians across six specialties were randomly assigned to a mail-only or web-push survey delivery. Each mode consisted of four contacts including an initial mailing, reminder postcard, and two additional follow-ups. Response rates were calculated using the American Association for Public Opinion Research's response rate 3 calculation. Data collection occurred between Febuary and April 2018; data were analyzed March 2019.

RESULTS

Overall reponse rates for the mail-only versus web-push survey delivery were comparable (51.2% vs. 52.8%). Higher response rates across all demographics were seen in the web-push delivery, with the exception of pulmonary/critical care and physicians over the age of 65. The web-push survey yielded a greater response after the first mailing, requiring fewer follow-up contacts resulting in a more cost-effective delivery.

CONCLUSIONS

A web-push mail survey is effective in achieving a comparable response rate to traditional mail-only delivery for physicians. The web-push survey was more efficient in terms of cost and in receiving responses in a more timely manner. Future research should explore the efficiency of a web-push survey delivery across various health care provider populations.

摘要

背景

实现医生的高回复率一直具有挑战性,且近年来回复率不断下降,因此需要创新方法来提高回复率。网络推送式调查发放是调查方法中一个新兴的概念。采用这种发放方式时,会通过邮件联系以要求通过网络进行回复。本研究探讨了对全国范围内的医生样本进行网络推送式调查的可行性。

方法

将1000名来自六个专业领域的医生随机分配到仅通过邮件或网络推送的调查发放组。每种方式都包括四次联系,包括一次初始邮件、一张提醒明信片以及另外两次跟进。回复率采用美国民意研究协会的回复率3计算方法来计算。数据收集于2018年2月至4月进行;数据分析于2019年3月进行。

结果

仅邮件方式与网络推送方式的总体回复率相当(分别为51.2%和52.8%)。除了肺科/重症监护医生以及65岁以上的医生外,网络推送方式在所有人口统计学特征中的回复率都更高。网络推送式调查在首次邮件发送后获得了更高的回复,所需的跟进联系更少,从而实现了更具成本效益的发放。

结论

对于医生而言,网络推送式邮件调查在实现与传统仅邮件发放相当的回复率方面是有效的。网络推送式调查在成本方面更高效,且能更及时地收到回复。未来的研究应探讨网络推送式调查发放方式在各类医疗保健提供者群体中的效率。

相似文献

1
The effect of a web-push survey on physician survey responses rates: a randomized experiment.网络推送调查对医生调查回复率的影响:一项随机试验。
Surv Pract. 2021;14(1). doi: 10.29115/sp-2021-0001. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
2
An experimental comparison of web-push vs. paper-only survey procedures for conducting an in-depth health survey of military spouses.关于网络推送与仅纸质调查问卷程序在对军属进行深入健康调查中的实验比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0337-1.
3
The Effectiveness of "Push-to-Web" as an Option for a Survey of New Mothers.“推送到网页”作为一种新妈妈调查选项的效果。
Matern Child Health J. 2020 Aug;24(8):960-965. doi: 10.1007/s10995-020-02936-0.
4
Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.在一项针对医生的调查中混合使用网络和邮件方式。
Health Serv Res. 2007 Jun;42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00652.x.
5
Building on a Sequential Mixed-Mode Research Design in the Monitoring the Future Study.基于“监测未来”研究中的序列混合模式研究设计。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2020 Nov 13;10(1):149-160. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smaa030. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
Visible Cash, a Second Incentive, and Priority Mail? An Experimental Evaluation of Mailing Strategies for a Screening Questionnaire in a National Push-to-Web/Mail Survey.可见现金、第二种激励措施和优先邮件?一项针对全国性网络/邮件推送调查中筛查问卷邮寄策略的实验评估。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2023 Feb 22;11(5):1011-1031. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smac041. eCollection 2023 Nov.
7
A randomized trial of mail and email recruitment strategies for a physician survey on clinical trial accrual.一项关于临床试验入组的医师调查的邮件和电子邮件招募策略的随机试验。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 May 19;20(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01014-x.
8
Two-Year Follow-up of a Sequential Mixed-Mode Experiment in the U.S. National Monitoring the Future Study.美国未来监测研究中一项序贯混合模式实验的两年随访
Surv Pract. 2019;12(1). doi: 10.29115/SP-2019-0003. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
9
Comparing Web-based with Mail Survey Administration of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) Clinician and Group Survey.比较基于网络与邮件方式进行的医疗服务提供者与系统消费者评估(CAHPS)临床医生及团体调查管理。
Prim Health Care. 2013 Apr 15;3. doi: 10.4172/2167-1079.1000132.
10
A Sequential Mixed-Mode Experiment in the U.S. National Monitoring the Future Study.美国“监测未来”研究中的一项序贯混合模式实验。
J Surv Stat Methodol. 2018 Mar;6(1):72-97. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smx011. Epub 2017 Jul 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceptions of Family Physicians About Applying AI in Primary Health Care: Case Study From a Premier Health Care Organization.家庭医生对人工智能在初级卫生保健中应用的看法:来自一家顶级医疗保健机构的案例研究。
JMIR AI. 2024 Apr 17;3:e40781. doi: 10.2196/40781.
2
Participation Rates in 11 National Dental Practice-Based Research Network Surveys 2014-2022.2014 - 2022年11项基于全国牙科实践的研究网络调查中的参与率
Eval Health Prof. 2025 Jun;48(2):242-255. doi: 10.1177/01632787241259186. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
3
The Impact of Varying Incentives on Physician Survey Response Rates: An experiment in the context of COVID-19.

本文引用的文献

1
"Knowledge, recommendation, and beliefs of e-cigarettes among physicians involved in tobacco cessation: A qualitative study".参与戒烟的医生对电子烟的认知、建议和看法:一项定性研究
Prev Med Rep. 2017 Aug 5;8:25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2017.07.012. eCollection 2017 Dec.
2
An experimental comparison of web-push vs. paper-only survey procedures for conducting an in-depth health survey of military spouses.关于网络推送与仅纸质调查问卷程序在对军属进行深入健康调查中的实验比较。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0337-1.
3
Patient-physician communication regarding electronic cigarettes.
不同激励措施对医生调查回复率的影响:一项在新冠疫情背景下的实验
Surv Pract. 2022;15(1). doi: 10.29115/sp-2022-0012. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
4
Clinical practice applicability and relevance to non-specialists of a paediatric EEG online learning tool.儿科脑电图在线学习工具对非专业人员的临床实用性和相关性。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Jan 31;24(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-05017-2.
5
Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires.增加邮寄和电子问卷回复率的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 30;11(11):MR000008. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000008.pub5.
6
Adaptations for remote research work: a modified web-push strategy compared to a mail-only strategy for administering a survey of healthcare experiences.远程研究工作的适应策略:一种改良的网络推送策略与仅邮件策略相比,用于管理医疗保健体验调查。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2023 Oct 19;23(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12874-023-02066-5.
7
Differences between doctors of medicine and dental medicine in the perception of professionalism on social networking sites: the development of the e-professionalism assessment compatibility index (ePACI).医学博士和牙医学博士在社交网站上对职业道德认知的差异:电子职业道德评估兼容性指数 (ePACI) 的发展。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Dec 6;23(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00870-0.
8
Comparison of a web-push vs. mailed survey protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel study among adults ages 35 to 60.在针对35至60岁成年人的“监测未来”小组研究中,网络推送调查协议与邮寄调查协议的比较。
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022 Sep;4. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100089. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
9
Lung Cancer Screening Knowledge and Perceived Barriers Among Physicians in the United States.美国医生对肺癌筛查的认知及感知到的障碍
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022 Apr 22;3(7):100331. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100331. eCollection 2022 Jul.
10
Perceived effectiveness of cancer screening among family medicine and internal medicine physicians in the United States.美国家庭医学和内科医生对癌症筛查有效性的认知
Prev Med Rep. 2022 May 23;28:101842. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101842. eCollection 2022 Aug.
关于电子烟的医患沟通。
Prev Med Rep. 2015 Feb 2;2:96-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.01.006. eCollection 2015.
4
Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys.探索医生专科医生对基于网络的调查的回应率。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015 Apr 9;15:32. doi: 10.1186/s12874-015-0016-z.
5
Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response.提高卫生保健专业人员调查的回应率:改善回应率的技术的荟萃分析。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Sep;36(3):382-407. doi: 10.1177/0163278713496425.
6
Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000-2010: a review.美国 2000-2010 年卫生保健提供者调查:综述。
Eval Health Prof. 2013 Mar;36(1):106-26. doi: 10.1177/0163278712474001.
7
Improving the quality of surveys of physicians and medical groups: a research agenda.提高医师和医疗团体调查质量:研究议程。
Eval Health Prof. 2012 Dec;35(4):477-506. doi: 10.1177/0163278712458283. Epub 2012 Sep 3.
8
Physicians' perceptions regarding effectiveness of tobacco cessation medications: are they aligned with the evidence?医生对戒烟药物有效性的看法:这些看法与证据相符吗?
Prev Med. 2011 Dec;53(6):433-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.09.016. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
9
A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors.一项关于医生调查中应答模式对应答率、应答偏差和项目无应答影响的随机试验和经济评估。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Sep 5;11:126. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-126.
10
Family physicians' practices and attitudes regarding care of extremely obese patients.家庭医生对极度肥胖患者护理的诊疗行为及态度。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2009 Sep;17(9):1710-6. doi: 10.1038/oby.2009.62. Epub 2009 Mar 12.