Young William J, Bover Manderski Michelle T, Singh Binu, Delnevo Cristine D
Rutgers Center for Tobacco Studies.
Surv Pract. 2022;15(1). doi: 10.29115/sp-2022-0012. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
Since 2018, our research team has fielded national, probability surveys of internal medicine physicians. We expected our usually high response rates to fall in the 2021 iteration of the survey due to challenges related to the COVID-19 pandemic and our inability to offer all participants a $50 upfront incentive as we had previously. To understand the independent impacts of the lower incentive and surveying physicians in the context of the pandemic, we fielded an experiment varying the incentive amount physicians were offered. Our results suggest that while higher incentives still lead to higher response rates during COVID-19, the higher incentive did not achieve comparable pre-COVID response rates. We conclude with additional data on the impact of the incentives on survey cost, number of reminders needed, and the mode in which respondents chose to complete the survey.
自2018年以来,我们的研究团队开展了针对内科医生的全国性概率抽样调查。由于与新冠疫情相关的挑战,以及我们无法像之前那样为所有参与者提供50美元的前期激励,我们预计在2021年的调查中,我们通常较高的回复率会下降。为了了解在疫情背景下较低激励措施和对医生进行调查的独立影响,我们进行了一项实验,改变提供给医生的激励金额。我们的结果表明,虽然在新冠疫情期间,较高的激励措施仍然会带来较高的回复率,但更高的激励措施并未达到疫情前可比的回复率。我们最后给出了关于激励措施对调查成本、所需提醒次数以及受访者选择完成调查的方式的影响的补充数据。