Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, PO Box 30.001, NL-9700, RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Implant Dentistry, Dental School, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Feb 19;7(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00292-4.
Clinical studies of single-tooth replacement in compromised bone using bone level tapered implants in the aesthetic zone are scarce.
To assess clinically, radiographically and aesthetically over 1 year the performance of a bone level tapered implant in the maxillary aesthetic zone in sites after alveolar ridge preservation.
Thirty patients (16 male, 14 female) with a failing tooth and large bone defect after removal received alveolar ridge preservation. After 3 months, implants were placed with immediate provisionalization. Definitive restorations were placed after 3 months. The treatment was evaluated 1 year following the definitive restoration.
All the patients attended the 1-year follow-up. One implant was lost (96.7% implant survival rate). The mean implant stability quotient value was 68.9 ± 8.74 at implant placement. The mean marginal bone level change was minor (- 0.07 ± 0.12 mm). The mean mid-buccal mucosa changed with + 0.01 ± 0.45 mm. The median Pink Esthetic Score and White Esthetic Score after 1 year were 6 [4; 7] and 8 [7; 9], respectively. The patients' mean overall satisfaction (0-100 VAS scale) was 86.6 ± 10.3.
Bone level tapered implants with immediate provisionalization perform well after alveolar ridge preservation in the maxillary aesthetic zone, according to implant stability, clinical, radiographic, aesthetic and patient-centred outcomes.
NTR, NL8755 . Registered on 1 January 2016.
在美学区域使用骨水平锥形种植体对骨量不足的单颗牙缺失进行临床研究很少。
在牙槽嵴保存后的上颌美学区域,评估种植体在 1 年以上的临床、放射学和美学表现。
30 名患者(16 名男性,14 名女性)因拔牙后失败和牙槽骨大量缺损,接受了牙槽嵴保存。3 个月后,植入物被植入并立即临时修复。3 个月后进行最终修复。在最终修复后 1 年对治疗进行评估。
所有患者均接受了 1 年的随访。1 个种植体脱落(96.7%的种植体存活率)。种植体放置时的平均种植体稳定性指数值为 68.9 ± 8.74。平均边缘骨水平变化较小(-0.07 ± 0.12mm)。平均颊侧黏膜变化为+0.01 ± 0.45mm。1 年后的中位 Pink 美学评分和 White 美学评分为 6[4;7]和 8[7;9]。患者的总体满意度(0-100VAS 评分)平均为 86.6 ± 10.3。
根据种植体稳定性、临床、放射学、美学和以患者为中心的结果,在牙槽嵴保存后的上颌美学区域,使用骨水平锥形种植体并进行即刻临时修复,效果良好。
NTR,NL8755。于 2016 年 1 月 1 日注册。