• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对 HSE 的新冠接触者追踪应用的用户反馈进行情绪分析。

Sentiment analysis of user feedback on the HSE's Covid-19 contact tracing app.

机构信息

Lero - The Irish Software Research Centre, Tierney Building, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Feb;191(1):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02529-y. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1007/s11845-021-02529-y
PMID:33604836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7891483/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Digital Contact Tracing is seen as a key tool in reducing the propagation of Covid-19. But it requires high uptake and continued participation across the population to be effective. To achieve sufficient uptake/participation, health authorities should address, and thus be aware of, user concerns.

AIM

This work manually analyzes user reviews of the Irish Heath Service Executive's (HSE) Contact Tracker app, to identify user concerns and to lay the foundations for subsequent, large-scale, automated analyses of reviews. While this might seem tightly scoped to the Irish context, the HSE app provides the basis for apps in many jurisdictions in the USA and Europe.

METHODS

Manual analysis of (1287) user reviews from the Google/Apple playstores was performed, to identify the aspects of the app that users focused on, and the positive/negative sentiment expressed.

RESULTS

The findings suggest a largely positive sentiment towards the app, and that users thought it handled data protection and transparency aspects well. But feedback suggests that users would appreciate more targeted feedback on the incidence of the virus, and facilities for more proactive engagement, like notifications that prompt users to submit their health status daily. Finally, the analysis suggests that the "android battery" issue and the backward-compatibility issue with iPhones seriously impacted retention/uptake of the app respectively.

CONCLUSION

The HSE have responded to the public's desire for targeted feedback in newer versions, but should consider increasing the app's proactive engagement. The results suggest they should also raise the backward compatibility issue, regarding older iPhones, with Apple.

摘要

背景

数字接触追踪被视为减少新冠病毒传播的关键工具。但要使其有效,需要在整个人群中实现高使用率和持续参与。为了达到足够的使用率/参与率,卫生当局应该解决用户关注的问题,并因此了解这些问题。

目的

这项工作手动分析了爱尔兰卫生服务行政署(HSE)联系人追踪器应用程序的用户评论,以识别用户关注的问题,并为后续对评论进行大规模自动化分析奠定基础。虽然这似乎仅限于爱尔兰的情况,但 HSE 应用程序为美国和欧洲许多司法管辖区的应用程序提供了基础。

方法

对 Google/Apple 应用商店中的(1287)用户评论进行了手动分析,以确定用户关注的应用程序方面,以及表达的积极/消极情绪。

结果

调查结果表明,用户对该应用程序的评价基本为正面,并且用户认为它很好地处理了数据保护和透明度方面的问题。但是反馈表明,用户希望更有针对性地了解病毒的发病率,并提供更积极主动的参与方式,例如提示用户每天提交健康状况的通知。最后,分析表明,“安卓电池”问题和 iPhone 的向后兼容性问题分别严重影响了应用程序的保留/使用率。

结论

HSE 已经针对公众对针对性反馈的需求在新版本中做出了回应,但应考虑增加应用程序的主动参与度。结果表明,他们还应该与苹果公司一起提高对旧款 iPhone 的向后兼容性问题的重视。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/770278e045d0/11845_2021_2529_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/fe9ed567d1fa/11845_2021_2529_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/10b9ffaaefae/11845_2021_2529_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/ef320d9b719e/11845_2021_2529_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/6cdc4d557457/11845_2021_2529_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/770278e045d0/11845_2021_2529_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/fe9ed567d1fa/11845_2021_2529_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/10b9ffaaefae/11845_2021_2529_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/ef320d9b719e/11845_2021_2529_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/6cdc4d557457/11845_2021_2529_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45c9/8789719/770278e045d0/11845_2021_2529_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sentiment analysis of user feedback on the HSE's Covid-19 contact tracing app.对 HSE 的新冠接触者追踪应用的用户反馈进行情绪分析。
Ir J Med Sci. 2022 Feb;191(1):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s11845-021-02529-y. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.数字接触者追踪应用程序的最佳实践指南:文献的跨学科综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e27753. doi: 10.2196/27753.
3
Using Venn Diagrams to Evaluate Digital Contact Tracing: Panel Survey Analysis.使用文氏图评估数字接触者追踪:面板调查分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Dec 6;7(12):e30004. doi: 10.2196/30004.
4
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
5
Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development: Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of European Apps.**COVID-19 追踪应用的质量和采用情况,以及开发建议:对欧洲应用的系统跨学科审查。**
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e27989. doi: 10.2196/27989.
6
The Dutch COVID-19 Notification App: Lessons Learned From a Mixed Methods Evaluation Among End Users and Contact-Tracing Employees.荷兰新冠疫情通知应用程序:终端用户和接触者追踪工作人员混合方法评估的经验教训
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Nov 4;6(11):e38904. doi: 10.2196/38904.
7
Reasons for Nonuse, Discontinuation of Use, and Acceptance of Additional Functionalities of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App: Cross-sectional Survey Study.新冠接触者追踪应用程序的未使用、停用和接受额外功能的原因:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 Jan 14;8(1):e22113. doi: 10.2196/22113.
8
The more the merrier! Barriers and facilitators to the general public's use of a COVID-19 contact tracing app in New Zealand.越多越好!新西兰公众使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的障碍和促进因素。
Inform Health Soc Care. 2022 Apr 3;47(2):132-143. doi: 10.1080/17538157.2021.1951274. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
9
Usability, inclusivity, and content evaluation of COVID-19 contact tracing apps in the United States.美国 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的可用性、包容性和内容评估。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Aug 13;28(9):1982-1989. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab093.
10
App Use and Usability of a Barcode-Based Digital Platform to Augment COVID-19 Contact Tracing: Postpilot Survey and Paradata Analysis.基于条码的数字化平台在 COVID-19 接触者追踪中的应用和可用性:后试点调查和副数据分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Mar 26;7(3):e25859. doi: 10.2196/25859.

引用本文的文献

1
Self voting classification model for online meeting app review sentiment analysis and topic modeling.用于在线会议应用程序评论情感分析和主题建模的自投票分类模型。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2022 Dec 15;8:e1141. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1141. eCollection 2022.
2
Global User-Level Perception of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Applications: Data-Driven Approach Using Natural Language Processing.全球用户对COVID-19接触者追踪应用程序的认知:使用自然语言处理的数据驱动方法。
JMIR Form Res. 2022 May 11;6(5):e36238. doi: 10.2196/36238.
3
Public opinion of the Irish "COVID Tracker" digital contact tracing App: A national survey.
爱尔兰“新冠追踪器”数字接触者追踪应用程序的公众意见:一项全国性调查。
Digit Health. 2022 Mar 16;8:20552076221085065. doi: 10.1177/20552076221085065. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
4
Public Perception of the Use of Digital Contact-Tracing Tools After the COVID-19 Lockdown: Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining.新冠疫情封锁后公众对数字接触者追踪工具使用情况的认知:情感分析与观点挖掘
JMIR Form Res. 2022 Mar 4;6(3):e33314. doi: 10.2196/33314.
5
Digital Contact Tracing Apps for COVID-19: Development of a Citizen-Centered Evaluation Framework.数字接触者追踪应用程序用于 COVID-19:以公民为中心的评估框架的开发。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 11;10(3):e30691. doi: 10.2196/30691.
6
Characteristics and determinants of population acceptance of COVID-19 digital contact tracing: a systematic review.新冠病毒数字接触者追踪技术的公众接受特征和决定因素:系统综述。
Acta Biomed. 2021 Dec 10;92(S6):e2021444. doi: 10.23750/abm.v92iS6.12234.
7
Mining user reviews of COVID contact-tracing apps: An exploratory analysis of nine European apps.挖掘新冠病毒接触者追踪应用的用户评价:对九款欧洲应用的探索性分析。
J Syst Softw. 2022 Feb;184:111136. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.111136. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
8
What do users think of the UK's three COVID-19 contact-tracing apps? A comparative analysis.用户如何看待英国的三款 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序?一项比较分析。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021 Jul;28(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100320.
9
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.数字接触者追踪应用程序的最佳实践指南:文献的跨学科综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e27753. doi: 10.2196/27753.