• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

**COVID-19 追踪应用的质量和采用情况,以及开发建议:对欧洲应用的系统跨学科审查。**

Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development: Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of European Apps.

机构信息

Department of Health Psychology and Applied Biological Psychology, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.

Competencies for Digitally-Enhanced Individualized Practice Project, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, Lüneburg, Germany.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e27989. doi: 10.2196/27989.

DOI:10.2196/27989
PMID:33890867
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8174558/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Simulation study results suggest that COVID-19 contact tracing apps have the potential to achieve pandemic control. Concordantly, high app adoption rates were a stipulated prerequisite for success. Early studies on potential adoption were encouraging. Several factors predicting adoption rates were investigated, especially pertaining to user characteristics. Since then, several countries have released COVID-19 contact tracing apps.

OBJECTIVE

This study's primary aim is to investigate the quality characteristics of national European COVID-19 contact tracing apps, thereby shifting attention from user to app characteristics. The secondary aim is to investigate associations between app quality and adoption. Finally, app features contributing to higher app quality were identified.

METHODS

Eligible COVID-19 contact tracing apps were those released by national health authorities of European Union member states, former member states, and countries of the European Free Trade Association, all countries with comparable legal standards concerning personal data protection and app use voluntariness. The Mobile App Rating Scale was used to assess app quality. An interdisciplinary team, consisting of two health and two human-computer interaction scientists, independently conducted Mobile App Rating Scale ratings. To investigate associations between app quality and adoption rates and infection rates, Bayesian linear regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

We discovered 21 national COVID-19 contact tracing apps, all demonstrating high quality overall and high-level functionality, aesthetics, and information quality. However, the average app adoption rate of 22.9% (SD 12.5%) was below the level recommended by simulation studies. Lower levels of engagement-oriented app design were detected, with substantial variations between apps. By regression analyses, the best-case adoption rate was calculated by assuming apps achieve the highest ratings. The mean best-case adoption rates for engagement and overall app quality were 39.5% and 43.6%, respectively. Higher adoption rates were associated with lower cumulative infection rates. Overall, we identified 5 feature categories (symptom assessment and monitoring, regularly updated information, individualization, tracing, and communication) and 14 individual features that contributed to higher app quality. These 14 features were a symptom checker, a symptom diary, statistics on COVID-19, app use, public health instructions and restrictions, information of burden on health care system, assigning personal data, regional updates, control over tracing activity, contact diary, venue check-in, chats, helplines, and app-sharing capacity.

CONCLUSIONS

European national health authorities have generally released high quality COVID-19 contact tracing apps, with regard to functionality, aesthetics, and information quality. However, the app's engagement-oriented design generally was of lower quality, even though regression analyses results identify engagement as a promising optimization target to increase adoption rates. Associations between higher app adoption and lower infection rates are consistent with simulation study results, albeit acknowledging that app use might be part of a broader set of protective attitudes and behaviors for self and others. Various features were identified that could guide further engagement-enhancing app development.

摘要

背景

模拟研究结果表明,COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序有可能实现大流行控制。相应地,高应用程序采用率是成功的规定前提。早期对潜在采用的研究是令人鼓舞的。调查了预测采用率的几个因素,特别是与用户特征有关的因素。从那时起,几个国家已经发布了 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序。

目的

本研究的主要目的是调查欧洲国家 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的质量特征,从而将注意力从用户转移到应用程序特征上。次要目的是调查应用程序质量与采用率之间的关联。最后,确定了有助于提高应用程序质量的应用程序功能。

方法

合格的 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序是指由欧盟成员国、前成员国和欧洲自由贸易联盟国家的国家卫生当局发布的应用程序,所有这些国家在个人数据保护和应用程序使用自愿性方面都具有可比的法律标准。使用移动应用程序评级量表来评估应用程序质量。一个由两名健康和两名人机交互科学家组成的跨学科团队,独立进行了移动应用程序评级量表评级。为了研究应用程序质量与采用率和感染率之间的关联,进行了贝叶斯线性回归分析。

结果

我们发现了 21 个国家的 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序,它们的整体质量都很高,具有高水平的功能、美学和信息质量。然而,平均 22.9%(SD 12.5%)的应用程序采用率低于模拟研究建议的水平。检测到以参与为导向的应用程序设计水平较低,各应用程序之间存在很大差异。通过回归分析,假设应用程序达到最高评级,计算出最佳采用率。以参与度和整体应用程序质量衡量的最佳采用率分别为 39.5%和 43.6%。较高的采用率与较低的累积感染率相关。总体而言,我们确定了 5 个功能类别(症状评估和监测、定期更新信息、个性化、追踪和通信)和 14 个单独的功能,这些功能有助于提高应用程序质量。这 14 个功能是症状检查器、症状日记、COVID-19 统计数据、应用程序使用情况、公共卫生说明和限制、对医疗系统负担的信息、个人数据分配、区域更新、追踪活动控制、联系人日记、场地签到、聊天、帮助热线和应用程序共享能力。

结论

欧洲国家卫生当局普遍发布了具有高水平功能、美学和信息质量的 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序。然而,应用程序以参与为导向的设计质量普遍较低,尽管回归分析结果表明参与度是提高采用率的一个有前途的优化目标。较高的应用程序采用率与较低的感染率之间的关联与模拟研究结果一致,但需要承认,应用程序使用可能是自我和他人保护态度和行为的更广泛组合的一部分。已经确定了各种可以指导进一步增强参与度的应用程序开发的功能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb2/8174558/b29b7bf49a90/jmir_v23i6e27989_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb2/8174558/4eaad42878d8/jmir_v23i6e27989_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb2/8174558/c9c89f2bf396/jmir_v23i6e27989_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb2/8174558/8e863ab8c121/jmir_v23i6e27989_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb2/8174558/b29b7bf49a90/jmir_v23i6e27989_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb2/8174558/4eaad42878d8/jmir_v23i6e27989_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb2/8174558/c9c89f2bf396/jmir_v23i6e27989_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb2/8174558/8e863ab8c121/jmir_v23i6e27989_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aeb2/8174558/b29b7bf49a90/jmir_v23i6e27989_fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Quality and Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps and Recommendations for Development: Systematic Interdisciplinary Review of European Apps.**COVID-19 追踪应用的质量和采用情况,以及开发建议:对欧洲应用的系统跨学科审查。**
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jun 2;23(6):e27989. doi: 10.2196/27989.
2
Best Practice Guidance for Digital Contact Tracing Apps: A Cross-disciplinary Review of the Literature.数字接触者追踪应用程序的最佳实践指南:文献的跨学科综述。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 7;9(6):e27753. doi: 10.2196/27753.
3
State of the Art in Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps and Recommendations Regarding Privacy Protection and Public Health: Systematic Review.接触者追踪应用程序的应用现状以及关于隐私保护和公共卫生的建议:系统评价
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 10;9(6):e23250. doi: 10.2196/23250.
4
The Roles of General Health and COVID-19 Proximity in Contact Tracing App Usage: Cross-sectional Survey Study.一般健康状况和与 COVID-19 的接近程度在接触者追踪应用程序使用中的作用:横断面调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Aug 18;7(8):e27892. doi: 10.2196/27892.
5
COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Predicted Uptake in the Netherlands Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment.COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序:基于离散选择实验预测荷兰的使用率。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 9;8(10):e20741. doi: 10.2196/20741.
6
Technology, Privacy, and User Opinions of COVID-19 Mobile Apps for Contact Tracing: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.技术、隐私和用户对 COVID-19 移动接触追踪应用程序的看法:系统搜索和内容分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 9;23(2):e23467. doi: 10.2196/23467.
7
The Role of Transparency, Trust, and Social Influence on Uncertainty Reduction in Times of Pandemics: Empirical Study on the Adoption of COVID-19 Tracing Apps.透明度、信任和社会影响在大流行时期减少不确定性的作用:对 COVID-19 追踪应用程序采用的实证研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 8;23(2):e25893. doi: 10.2196/25893.
8
Utilizing Health Behavior Change and Technology Acceptance Models to Predict the Adoption of COVID-19 Contact Tracing Apps: Cross-sectional Survey Study.利用健康行为改变和技术接受模型预测 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的采用:横断面调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 19;23(5):e25447. doi: 10.2196/25447.
9
Adaptation and Utilization of a Postmarket Evaluation Model for Digital Contact Tracing Mobile Health Tools in the United States: Observational Cross-sectional Study.美国数字接触者追踪移动健康工具的上市后评估模型的调整和利用:观察性横断面研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Mar 22;9:e38633. doi: 10.2196/38633.
10
Country- and app-level factors affecting the adoption and evaluation of COVID-19 mobile apps.影响 COVID-19 移动应用程序采用和评估的国家和应用程序层面的因素。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Dec 31;22(1):2457. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14918-8.

引用本文的文献

1
The Influence of Medical Culture and Key Factors on Mobile App Usage Frequency and Perceived Effectiveness in Physical Therapy: Cross-Sectional Study.医学文化和关键因素对物理治疗中移动应用使用频率及感知有效性的影响:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jun 12;27:e68406. doi: 10.2196/68406.
2
The Use of COVID-19 Mobile Apps in Connecting Patients with Primary Healthcare in 30 Countries: Eurodata Study.30个国家中COVID-19移动应用程序在将患者与初级医疗保健相连接方面的应用:欧洲数据研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jul 16;12(14):1420. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12141420.
3
Evaluation of Chinese HIV Mobile Apps by Researchers and Patients With HIV: Quality Evaluation Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality of Physical Activity Apps: Systematic Search in App Stores and Content Analysis.体育活动类应用程序质量:应用商店的系统搜索和内容分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jun 9;9(6):e22587. doi: 10.2196/22587.
2
The epidemiological impact of the NHS COVID-19 app.NHS COVID-19 应用程序的流行病学影响。
Nature. 2021 Jun;594(7863):408-412. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03606-z. Epub 2021 May 12.
3
Initial report of decreased SARS-CoV-2 viral load after inoculation with the BNT162b2 vaccine.接种 BNT162b2 疫苗后 SARS-CoV-2 病毒载量下降的初步报告。
研究人员和艾滋病病毒感染者对中国艾滋病病毒移动应用程序的评估:质量评估研究
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 26;12:e52573. doi: 10.2196/52573.
4
Mobile Apps for COVID-19: A Systematic Review of Reviews.用于 COVID-19 的移动应用程序:综述的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Jan 8;12(2):139. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12020139.
5
The Impact of Digital Transformation on Blood Donation and Donor Characteristics.数字转型对献血及献血者特征的影响
Transfus Med Hemother. 2023 Jun 5;50(6):531-538. doi: 10.1159/000530270. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
Evaluating the Added Value of Digital Contact Tracing Support Tools for Citizens: Framework Development.评估面向公民的数字接触者追踪支持工具的附加价值:框架开发
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 29;12:e44728. doi: 10.2196/44728.
7
Adoption of a COVID-19 Contact Tracing App by Czech Youth: Cross-Cultural Replication Study.采用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序的捷克青年:跨文化复制研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2023 Nov 16;10:e45481. doi: 10.2196/45481.
8
Investigating Individuals' Preferences in Determining the Functions of Smartphone Apps for Fighting Pandemics: Best-Worst Scaling Survey Study.调查个人在确定抗击疫情智能手机应用程序功能方面的偏好:最佳最差标度调查研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 15;25:e48308. doi: 10.2196/48308.
9
A discrete choice experiment to examine the factors influencing consumers' willingness to purchase health apps.一项用于考察影响消费者购买健康应用程序意愿因素的离散选择实验。
Mhealth. 2023 Jul 3;9:21. doi: 10.21037/mhealth-22-39. eCollection 2023.
10
User Compliance With the Health Emergency and Disaster Management System: Systematic Literature Review.用户对卫生应急和灾害管理系统的遵从性:系统文献回顾。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 5;25:e41168. doi: 10.2196/41168.
Nat Med. 2021 May;27(5):790-792. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01316-7. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
4
Anatomy of digital contact tracing: Role of age, transmission setting, adoption, and case detection.数字接触者追踪的解剖:年龄、传播环境、采用率和病例发现的作用。
Sci Adv. 2021 Apr 9;7(15). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd8750. Print 2021 Apr.
5
Digital contact-tracing during the Covid-19 pandemic: An analysis of newspaper coverage in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland.新冠疫情期间的数字接触者追踪:对德国、奥地利和瑞士报纸报道的分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 3;16(2):e0246524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246524. eCollection 2021.
6
Tracking and promoting the usage of a COVID-19 contact tracing app.追踪和推广使用 COVID-19 接触者追踪应用程序。
Nat Hum Behav. 2021 Feb;5(2):247-255. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-01044-x. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
7
Who does or does not use the 'Corona-Warn-App' and why?谁使用或不使用“Corona-Warn-App”,为什么?
Eur J Public Health. 2021 Feb 1;31(1):49-51. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa239.
8
Drivers of Acceptance of COVID-19 Proximity Tracing Apps in Switzerland: Panel Survey Analysis.瑞士 COVID-19 接触追踪应用接受度的驱动因素:面板调查分析。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Jan 6;7(1):e25701. doi: 10.2196/25701.
9
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.BNT162b2 mRNA 新冠病毒疫苗的安全性和有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
10
Design Features for Improving Mobile Health Intervention User Engagement: Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis.设计特点提高移动健康干预用户参与:系统评价和主题分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 9;22(12):e21687. doi: 10.2196/21687.