Suppr超能文献

女同性恋者和男同性恋者中随意性行为接受度的性别相似性和差异性。

Gender Similarities and Differences in Casual Sex Acceptance Among Lesbian Women and Gay Men.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Pennsylvania State University, 416 Moore Building, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.

Department of Women's, Gender and Sexuality Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Sex Behav. 2021 Apr;50(3):1151-1166. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01864-y. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

Abstract

Popular wisdom and scientific evidence suggest women desire and engage in casual sex less frequently than men; however, theories of gender differences in sexuality are often formulated in light of heterosexual relations. Less is understood about sexual behavior among lesbian and gay people, or individuals in which there is arguably less motivation to pursue sex for reproductive purposes and fewer expectations for people to behave in gender-typical ways. Drawing from scripts theory and pleasure theory, in two studies (N =  465; N =  487) we examined lesbian and gay people's acceptance of casual sex. We asked participants who had been propositioned for casual sex whether they accepted the offer and to rate their perceptions of the proposer's sexual capabilities and sexual orientation. They also reported on their awareness of stigma surrounding casual sex. We found a gender difference in acceptance: Gay men were more likely than lesbian women to have accepted a casual sex offer from other gay/lesbian people, and this difference was mediated by participants' stigma awareness. We also found the proposer's sexual orientation played a role in people's acceptance. Lesbian women and gay men were equally likely to accept offers from bisexual proposers but expressed different acceptance rates with "straight-but-curious" proposers, which was mediated by expected pleasure. We discuss dynamics within lesbian and gay communities and implications for studying theories of sexual behavior and gender differences beyond heterosexual contexts.

摘要

大众观点和科学证据表明,女性的随意性行为比男性少;然而,关于性别的理论往往是基于异性关系来制定的。对于女同性恋和男同性恋者的性行为,或者对于那些可能没有那么多生殖目的的性行为动机,以及对于人们以性别典型方式行事的期望较少的人来说,人们了解得较少。本研究借鉴脚本理论和愉悦理论,在两项研究(N=465;N=487)中,我们考察了女同性恋者和男同性恋者对随意性行为的接受程度。我们询问了被提议进行随意性行为的参与者是否接受了邀请,并对提议者的性能力和性取向进行了评价。他们还报告了对随意性行为相关耻辱感的认识。我们发现了接受程度的性别差异:男同性恋者比女同性恋者更有可能接受其他男同性恋者或女同性恋者的随意性行为邀请,这种差异是由参与者对耻辱感的认识所介导的。我们还发现,提议者的性取向在人们的接受程度中起作用。女同性恋者和男同性恋者接受双性恋提议者的可能性相同,但对“直但好奇”的提议者的接受率不同,这是由预期的愉悦所介导的。我们讨论了女同性恋者和男同性恋者群体内部的动态以及在超越异性恋背景的情况下研究性行为理论和性别差异的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验