• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生和医院因素对1级退行性腰椎滑脱症手术决策的影响:质量结果数据库分析

Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on surgical decision-making for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Quality Outcomes Database analysis.

作者信息

Huang Meng, Buchholz Avery, Goyal Anshit, Bisson Erica, Ghogawala Zoher, Potts Eric, Knightly John, Coric Domagoj, Asher Anthony, Foley Kevin, Mummaneni Praveen V, Park Paul, Shaffrey Mark, Fu Kai-Ming, Slotkin Jonathan, Glassman Steven, Bydon Mohamad, Wang Michael

机构信息

1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Florida.

7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Feb 19;34(5):768-778. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE201015. Print 2021 May 1.

DOI:10.3171/2020.8.SPINE201015
PMID:33607612
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Surgical treatment for degenerative spondylolisthesis has been proven to be clinically challenging and cost-effective. However, there is a range of thresholds that surgeons utilize for incorporating fusion in addition to decompressive laminectomy in these cases. This study investigates these surgeon- and site-specific factors by using the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD).

METHODS

The QOD was queried for all cases that had undergone surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis from database inception to February 2019. In addition to patient-specific covariates, surgeon-specific covariates included age, sex, race, years in practice (0-10, 11-20, 21-30, > 30 years), and fellowship training. Site-specific variables included hospital location (rural, suburban, urban), teaching versus nonteaching status, and hospital type (government, nonfederal; private, nonprofit; private, investor owned). Multivariable regression and predictor importance analyses were performed to identify predictors of the treatment performed (decompression alone vs decompression and fusion). The model was clustered by site to account for site-specific heterogeneity in treatment selection.

RESULTS

A total of 12,322 cases were included with 1988 (16.1%) that had undergone decompression alone. On multivariable regression analysis clustered by site, adjusting for patient-level clinical covariates, no surgeon-specific factors were found to be significantly associated with the odds of selecting decompression alone as the surgery performed. However, sites located in suburban areas (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.09-4.84, p = 0.03) were more likely to perform decompression alone (reference = urban). Sites located in rural areas had higher odds of performing decompression alone than hospitals located in urban areas, although the results were not statistically significant (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.59-2.61, p = 0.49). Nonteaching status was independently associated with lower odds of performing decompression alone (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.97, p = 0.04). Predictor importance analysis revealed that the most important determinants of treatment selection were dominant symptom (Wald χ2 = 34.7, accounting for 13.6% of total χ2) and concurrent diagnosis of disc herniation (Wald χ2 = 31.7, accounting for 12.4% of total χ2). Hospital teaching status was also found to be relatively important (Wald χ2 = 4.2, accounting for 1.6% of total χ2) but less important than other patient-level predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonteaching centers were more likely to perform decompressive laminectomy with supplemental fusion for spondylolisthesis. Suburban hospitals were more likely to perform decompression only. Surgeon characteristics were not found to influence treatment selection after adjustment for clinical covariates. Further large database registry experience from surgeons at high-volume academic centers at which surgically and medically complex patients are treated may provide additional insight into factors associated with treatment preference for degenerative spondylolisthesis.

摘要

目的

已证实退行性腰椎滑脱的手术治疗在临床上具有挑战性且具有成本效益。然而,在这些病例中,除了减压性椎板切除之外,外科医生在决定是否进行融合手术时采用了一系列不同的阈值。本研究通过使用质量结果数据库(QOD)来调查这些与外科医生和手术地点相关的因素。

方法

查询QOD中从数据库建立至2019年2月期间所有接受1度腰椎滑脱手术的病例。除了患者特定的协变量外,外科医生特定的协变量包括年龄、性别、种族、执业年限(0 - 10年、11 - 20年、21 - 30年、> 30年)以及专科培训经历。手术地点特定的变量包括医院位置(农村、郊区、城市)、教学医院与非教学医院的状态以及医院类型(政府、非联邦;私立、非营利;私立、投资者所有)。进行多变量回归和预测因素重要性分析,以确定所施行治疗(单纯减压与减压加融合)的预测因素。该模型按手术地点进行聚类,以考虑治疗选择中手术地点特定的异质性。

结果

共纳入12322例病例,其中1988例(16.1%)仅接受了减压手术。在按手术地点聚类的多变量回归分析中,对患者层面的临床协变量进行校正后,未发现任何外科医生特定因素与选择单纯减压手术的几率显著相关。然而,位于郊区的手术地点(比值比[OR] 2.32,95%置信区间[CI] 1.09 - 4.84,p = 0.03)更有可能仅施行减压手术(参照组 = 城市)。位于农村地区的手术地点施行单纯减压手术的几率高于城市地区的医院,尽管结果无统计学意义(OR 1.33,95% CI 0.59 - 2.61,p = 0.49)。非教学医院状态与施行单纯减压手术的较低几率独立相关(OR 0.40,95% CI 0.19 - 0.97,p = 0.04)。预测因素重要性分析显示,治疗选择的最重要决定因素是主要症状(Wald χ² = 34.7,占总χ²的13.6%)和椎间盘突出的并存诊断(Wald χ² = 31.7,占总χ²的12.4%)。还发现医院教学状态相对重要(Wald χ² = 4.2,占总χ²的1.6%),但不如其他患者层面的预测因素重要。

结论

非教学中心更有可能对腰椎滑脱施行减压性椎板切除并辅以融合手术。郊区医院更有可能仅施行减压手术。在对临床协变量进行校正后,未发现外科医生特征会影响治疗选择。来自大量治疗外科和医学复杂患者的学术中心的外科医生的更多大型数据库注册经验,可能会为与退行性腰椎滑脱治疗偏好相关的因素提供更多见解。

相似文献

1
Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on surgical decision-making for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Quality Outcomes Database analysis.外科医生和医院因素对1级退行性腰椎滑脱症手术决策的影响:质量结果数据库分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Feb 19;34(5):768-778. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE201015. Print 2021 May 1.
2
Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: factors associated with the decision to fuse.腰椎退行性滑脱:与融合决策相关的因素。
Spine J. 2021 May;21(5):821-828. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
3
Predictive model for long-term patient satisfaction after surgery for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database.I 型退变性腰椎滑脱症手术后患者长期满意度的预测模型:来自质量结果数据库的见解。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E12. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18734.
4
Laminectomy alone versus fusion for grade 1 lumbar spondylolisthesis in 426 patients from the prospective Quality Outcomes Database.来自前瞻性质量结果数据库的426例1级腰椎滑脱患者单纯椎板切除术与融合术的对比研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Nov 30;30(2):234-241. doi: 10.3171/2018.8.SPINE17913. Print 2019 Feb 1.
5
Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.腰椎管狭窄症和I度腰椎滑脱症患者是否应根据脊柱骨盆对线情况进行不同治疗?一项为期两年的回顾性研究,对单一医疗系统内多个地点的患者报告结局指标和临床结局进行倾向匹配比较。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
6
A comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and decompression alone for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.微创经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术与单纯减压治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的对比研究。
Neurosurg Focus. 2019 May 1;46(5):E13. doi: 10.3171/2019.2.FOCUS18722.
7
Variations in surgical practice and short-term outcomes for degenerative lumbar scoliosis and spondylolisthesis: do surgeon training and experience matter?退变性腰椎侧凸和脊椎滑脱的手术实践和短期结果的差异:外科医生的培训和经验是否重要?
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Feb 2;36(1). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzad109.
8
Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱症的微创与开放融合手术:质量结果数据库分析
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E11. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17188.
9
Radiographic predictors of delayed instability following decompression without fusion for degenerative grade I lumbar spondylolisthesis.退行性腰椎Ⅰ度滑脱减压未融合术后迟发性不稳定的影像学预测因素。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Apr;18(4):340-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12537. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
10
Patient-reported outcome improvements at 24-month follow-up after fusion added to decompression for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a multicenter study using the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱减压术后融合术24个月随访时患者报告的结局改善:一项使用质量结局数据库的多中心研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Apr 16;35(1):42-51. doi: 10.3171/2020.9.SPINE201082. Print 2021 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus Decompression.腰椎退行性椎体滑脱伴狭窄采用融合术与减压术治疗的全国趋势
Neurospine. 2024 Dec;21(4):1068-1077. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448624.312. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
2
Challenges in Contemporary Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical, Technological, and Patient-Specific Issues.当代脊柱外科的挑战:手术、技术及患者特异性问题的全面综述
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 14;13(18):5460. doi: 10.3390/jcm13185460.
3
Biomechanical response of decompression alone in lower grade lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis--A finite element analysis.
单纯减压对低等级腰椎退行性滑脱症的生物力学反应——有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 1;19(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04681-4.
4
Patterns in Decompression and Fusion Procedures for Patients With Lumbar Stenosis After Major Clinical Trial Results, 2016 to 2019.2016 年至 2019 年,主要临床试验结果后腰椎狭窄症患者减压和融合手术模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2326357. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26357.
5
Impact of Social Determinants of Health in Spine Surgery.健康的社会决定因素对脊柱手术的影响。
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2023 Jan;16(1):24-32. doi: 10.1007/s12178-022-09811-1. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
6
A cost-utility analysis between decompression only and fusion surgery for elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and sagittal imbalance.老年退变性腰椎管狭窄伴矢状面失平衡患者行减压手术与融合手术的成本-效用分析。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 27;12(1):20408. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-24784-4.