Huang Meng, Buchholz Avery, Goyal Anshit, Bisson Erica, Ghogawala Zoher, Potts Eric, Knightly John, Coric Domagoj, Asher Anthony, Foley Kevin, Mummaneni Praveen V, Park Paul, Shaffrey Mark, Fu Kai-Ming, Slotkin Jonathan, Glassman Steven, Bydon Mohamad, Wang Michael
1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami, Florida.
7Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Feb 19;34(5):768-778. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE201015. Print 2021 May 1.
Surgical treatment for degenerative spondylolisthesis has been proven to be clinically challenging and cost-effective. However, there is a range of thresholds that surgeons utilize for incorporating fusion in addition to decompressive laminectomy in these cases. This study investigates these surgeon- and site-specific factors by using the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD).
The QOD was queried for all cases that had undergone surgery for grade 1 spondylolisthesis from database inception to February 2019. In addition to patient-specific covariates, surgeon-specific covariates included age, sex, race, years in practice (0-10, 11-20, 21-30, > 30 years), and fellowship training. Site-specific variables included hospital location (rural, suburban, urban), teaching versus nonteaching status, and hospital type (government, nonfederal; private, nonprofit; private, investor owned). Multivariable regression and predictor importance analyses were performed to identify predictors of the treatment performed (decompression alone vs decompression and fusion). The model was clustered by site to account for site-specific heterogeneity in treatment selection.
A total of 12,322 cases were included with 1988 (16.1%) that had undergone decompression alone. On multivariable regression analysis clustered by site, adjusting for patient-level clinical covariates, no surgeon-specific factors were found to be significantly associated with the odds of selecting decompression alone as the surgery performed. However, sites located in suburban areas (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.09-4.84, p = 0.03) were more likely to perform decompression alone (reference = urban). Sites located in rural areas had higher odds of performing decompression alone than hospitals located in urban areas, although the results were not statistically significant (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.59-2.61, p = 0.49). Nonteaching status was independently associated with lower odds of performing decompression alone (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.97, p = 0.04). Predictor importance analysis revealed that the most important determinants of treatment selection were dominant symptom (Wald χ2 = 34.7, accounting for 13.6% of total χ2) and concurrent diagnosis of disc herniation (Wald χ2 = 31.7, accounting for 12.4% of total χ2). Hospital teaching status was also found to be relatively important (Wald χ2 = 4.2, accounting for 1.6% of total χ2) but less important than other patient-level predictors.
Nonteaching centers were more likely to perform decompressive laminectomy with supplemental fusion for spondylolisthesis. Suburban hospitals were more likely to perform decompression only. Surgeon characteristics were not found to influence treatment selection after adjustment for clinical covariates. Further large database registry experience from surgeons at high-volume academic centers at which surgically and medically complex patients are treated may provide additional insight into factors associated with treatment preference for degenerative spondylolisthesis.
已证实退行性腰椎滑脱的手术治疗在临床上具有挑战性且具有成本效益。然而,在这些病例中,除了减压性椎板切除之外,外科医生在决定是否进行融合手术时采用了一系列不同的阈值。本研究通过使用质量结果数据库(QOD)来调查这些与外科医生和手术地点相关的因素。
查询QOD中从数据库建立至2019年2月期间所有接受1度腰椎滑脱手术的病例。除了患者特定的协变量外,外科医生特定的协变量包括年龄、性别、种族、执业年限(0 - 10年、11 - 20年、21 - 30年、> 30年)以及专科培训经历。手术地点特定的变量包括医院位置(农村、郊区、城市)、教学医院与非教学医院的状态以及医院类型(政府、非联邦;私立、非营利;私立、投资者所有)。进行多变量回归和预测因素重要性分析,以确定所施行治疗(单纯减压与减压加融合)的预测因素。该模型按手术地点进行聚类,以考虑治疗选择中手术地点特定的异质性。
共纳入12322例病例,其中1988例(16.1%)仅接受了减压手术。在按手术地点聚类的多变量回归分析中,对患者层面的临床协变量进行校正后,未发现任何外科医生特定因素与选择单纯减压手术的几率显著相关。然而,位于郊区的手术地点(比值比[OR] 2.32,95%置信区间[CI] 1.09 - 4.84,p = 0.03)更有可能仅施行减压手术(参照组 = 城市)。位于农村地区的手术地点施行单纯减压手术的几率高于城市地区的医院,尽管结果无统计学意义(OR 1.33,95% CI 0.59 - 2.61,p = 0.49)。非教学医院状态与施行单纯减压手术的较低几率独立相关(OR 0.40,95% CI 0.19 - 0.97,p = 0.04)。预测因素重要性分析显示,治疗选择的最重要决定因素是主要症状(Wald χ² = 34.7,占总χ²的13.6%)和椎间盘突出的并存诊断(Wald χ² = 31.7,占总χ²的12.4%)。还发现医院教学状态相对重要(Wald χ² = 4.2,占总χ²的1.6%),但不如其他患者层面的预测因素重要。
非教学中心更有可能对腰椎滑脱施行减压性椎板切除并辅以融合手术。郊区医院更有可能仅施行减压手术。在对临床协变量进行校正后,未发现外科医生特征会影响治疗选择。来自大量治疗外科和医学复杂患者的学术中心的外科医生的更多大型数据库注册经验,可能会为与退行性腰椎滑脱治疗偏好相关的因素提供更多见解。