• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎退行性椎体滑脱伴狭窄采用融合术与减压术治疗的全国趋势

National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus Decompression.

作者信息

Ball Jacob R, Gallo Matthew C, Kebaish Kareem, Hang Nicole, Ton Andy, Hernandez Fergui, Abdou Marc, Karakash William J, Wang Jeffrey C, Hah Raymond J, Alluri Ram K

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

Neurospine. 2024 Dec;21(4):1068-1077. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448624.312. Epub 2024 Dec 31.

DOI:10.14245/ns.2448624.312
PMID:39765242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11744538/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to describe utilization, demographics, complications, and revisions for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) with stenosis undergoing decompression or decompression with fusion in the United States.

METHODS

A national insurance database was used to identify patients who underwent either decompression and fusion or decompression alone for management of DS from 2010-2022. Utilization trends, demographics, and complications for each procedure were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 162,878 patients were identified, of which 78,043 patients underwent combined single-level lumbar decompression and fusion and 84,835 underwent single-level lumbar decompression alone. Between 2010-2021, lumbar decompression and fusion became the predominant surgical intervention for DS in 2016 and continued to account for more than half of all procedures during the remainder of the study period. Factors such as age, sex, comorbidities, geographic region, and physician specialty training were associated with procedure choice. Decompression with fusion was associated with a lower risk of revision surgery up to 5 years postoperatively and an overall lower incidence of 30-day complications.

CONCLUSION

Decompression with fusion has become the most common treatment for lumbar DS over the past decade despite a lack of compelling evidence supporting its use compared to decompression alone. A variety of patient and surgeon-specific factors is associated with procedure choice. After accounting for cofounders, we identified treatment-specific complications that may be valuable when counseling patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述美国患有退行性腰椎滑脱(DS)并伴有椎管狭窄的患者接受减压手术或减压融合手术的使用情况、人口统计学特征、并发症及翻修情况。

方法

利用一个全国性保险数据库来识别2010年至2022年期间因DS接受减压融合手术或单纯减压手术的患者。比较了每种手术的使用趋势、人口统计学特征和并发症。

结果

共识别出162,878例患者,其中78,043例患者接受了单节段腰椎减压融合联合手术,84,835例患者仅接受了单节段腰椎减压手术。在2010年至2021年期间,腰椎减压融合手术在2016年成为DS的主要手术干预方式,并且在研究期的剩余时间里继续占所有手术的一半以上。年龄、性别、合并症、地理区域和医生专业培训等因素与手术选择有关。融合减压手术与术后5年内翻修手术风险较低以及30天并发症总体发生率较低相关。

结论

尽管与单纯减压相比,缺乏支持融合减压手术使用的有力证据,但在过去十年中,融合减压手术已成为腰椎DS最常见的治疗方法。多种患者和外科医生特定因素与手术选择有关。在考虑混杂因素后,我们确定了在为患者提供咨询时可能有价值的特定治疗并发症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a4/11744538/f8afd373b9ac/ns-2448624-312f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a4/11744538/29e4bb015df4/ns-2448624-312f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a4/11744538/f8afd373b9ac/ns-2448624-312f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a4/11744538/29e4bb015df4/ns-2448624-312f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02a4/11744538/f8afd373b9ac/ns-2448624-312f2.jpg

相似文献

1
National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus Decompression.腰椎退行性椎体滑脱伴狭窄采用融合术与减压术治疗的全国趋势
Neurospine. 2024 Dec;21(4):1068-1077. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448624.312. Epub 2024 Dec 31.
2
Patterns in Decompression and Fusion Procedures for Patients With Lumbar Stenosis After Major Clinical Trial Results, 2016 to 2019.2016 年至 2019 年,主要临床试验结果后腰椎狭窄症患者减压和融合手术模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2326357. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26357.
3
Single- versus multilevel fusion for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis and multilevel lumbar stenosis: four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial.单节段融合与多节段融合治疗单节段退变性腰椎滑脱伴多节段腰椎管狭窄:脊柱患者结局研究试验四年结果。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013 May 1;38(10):797-805. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827db30f.
4
Reoperation rate after surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis: a nationwide cohort study.腰椎管狭窄症手术无脊椎滑脱的再手术率:一项全国性队列研究。
Spine J. 2013 Oct;13(10):1230-7. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.069. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
5
Should patients with lumbar stenosis and grade I spondylolisthesis be treated differently based on spinopelvic alignment? A retrospective, two-year, propensity matched, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes from multiple sites within a single health system.腰椎管狭窄症和I度腰椎滑脱症患者是否应根据脊柱骨盆对线情况进行不同治疗?一项为期两年的回顾性研究,对单一医疗系统内多个地点的患者报告结局指标和临床结局进行倾向匹配比较。
Spine J. 2023 Jan;23(1):92-104. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.08.020. Epub 2022 Sep 3.
6
Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.退行性与先天性椎管狭窄症中稳定性保留减压术:人口统计学模式与患者预后
Spine J. 2017 Oct;17(10):1420-1425. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.031. Epub 2017 Apr 26.
7
Fusion versus decompression alone for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis: a target trial emulation with index trial benchmarking.融合与单纯减压治疗退变性腰椎滑脱伴椎管狭窄:基于基准试验的目标试验模拟
Eur Spine J. 2024 Nov;33(11):4281-4291. doi: 10.1007/s00586-024-08495-0. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
8
Patient's expectations of surgery for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis: analysis by type of surgery and patient factors from the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network (CSORN).患者对腰椎退行性滑脱手术的期望:来自加拿大脊柱结果和研究网络(CSORN)的手术类型和患者因素分析。
Spine J. 2023 Jun;23(6):805-815. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2023.01.018. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
9
Surgical outcomes between posterior decompression alone and posterior decompression with fusion surgery among patients with Meyerding grade 2 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a multicenter cohort study.Meyerding 分级 2 型退变性腰椎滑脱症患者单纯后路减压与后路减压融合术后的手术效果:一项多中心队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Oct 8;23(1):902. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05850-4.
10
The necessity and risk factors of subsequent fusion after decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis with lumbar spondylolisthesis: 5 years follow-up in two different large populations.单纯减压术后是否需要行后续融合治疗腰椎退变性滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的必要性及相关危险因素:两个不同大样本的 5 年随访研究。
Spine J. 2020 Oct;20(10):1566-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2020.04.026. Epub 2020 May 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Bilateral-Contralateral Endoscopic Decompression as a Fusion-Deferral Strategy in Upper Lumbar Stenosis: A Structural Rationale and Conditional Framework-A Technical Note with Cases Review.双侧-对侧内镜减压作为上腰椎管狭窄症融合延迟策略:结构原理与条件框架——附病例回顾的技术说明
J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 13;14(16):5726. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165726.
2
Large-Scale Analysis of Trends and Complications in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis Surgery: A Commentary on "National Trends in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With Stenosis Treated With Fusion Versus Decompression".腰椎滑脱症手术趋势与并发症的大规模分析:对“腰椎退行性滑脱伴狭窄行融合术与减压术治疗的全国趋势”的评论
Neurospine. 2024 Dec;21(4):1078-1079. doi: 10.14245/ns.2449356.678. Epub 2024 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns in Decompression and Fusion Procedures for Patients With Lumbar Stenosis After Major Clinical Trial Results, 2016 to 2019.2016 年至 2019 年,主要临床试验结果后腰椎狭窄症患者减压和融合手术模式。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Jul 3;6(7):e2326357. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26357.
2
Decompression alone versus decompression with fusion in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.单纯减压与减压融合治疗退行性腰椎滑脱伴腰椎管狭窄症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Mar;32(3):1054-1067. doi: 10.1007/s00586-022-07507-1. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
3
Decompression alone or decompression and fusion in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
退行性腰椎滑脱症单纯减压或减压融合术
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Jul 16;51:101559. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101559. eCollection 2022 Sep.
4
Outpatient versus inpatient lumbar decompression surgery: a matched noninferiority study investigating clinical and patient-reported outcomes.门诊与住院腰椎减压手术:一项调查临床和患者报告结局的配对非劣效性研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2022 May 6;37(4):485-497. doi: 10.3171/2022.3.SPINE211558. Print 2022 Oct 1.
5
Decompression with or without Fusion in Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.退变性腰椎滑脱症的减压融合与非融合。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Aug 5;385(6):526-538. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2100990.
6
Patient-reported outcome improvements at 24-month follow-up after fusion added to decompression for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a multicenter study using the Quality Outcomes Database.I度退行性腰椎滑脱减压术后融合术24个月随访时患者报告的结局改善:一项使用质量结局数据库的多中心研究
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Apr 16;35(1):42-51. doi: 10.3171/2020.9.SPINE201082. Print 2021 Jul 1.
7
Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on surgical decision-making for grade 1 degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a Quality Outcomes Database analysis.外科医生和医院因素对1级退行性腰椎滑脱症手术决策的影响:质量结果数据库分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Feb 19;34(5):768-778. doi: 10.3171/2020.8.SPINE201015. Print 2021 May 1.
8
Comparative Effectiveness of Microdecompression Alone vs Decompression Plus Instrumented Fusion in Lumbar Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.单纯小切口显微减压术与减压加内固定融合术治疗腰椎退行性滑脱的比较效果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Sep 1;3(9):e2015015. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.15015.
9
Trends in Spine Surgery Training During Neurological and Orthopaedic Surgery Residency: A 10-Year Analysis of ACGME Case Log Data.神经外科和骨科住院医师培训期间脊柱手术培训趋势:ACGME 病例记录数据分析 10 年。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Nov 20;101(22):e122. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.19.00466.
10
Lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis epidemiology: A systematic review with a focus on gender-specific and age-specific prevalence.腰椎退行性椎体滑脱症流行病学:一项侧重于性别和年龄特异性患病率的系统评价
J Orthop Translat. 2016 Dec 1;11:39-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2016.11.001. eCollection 2017 Oct.