Human Appetite Research Unit, School of Psychology, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
The Kellogg Company, Orange Tower Media City, Salford, Greater Manchester, UK.
Eur J Nutr. 2021 Sep;60(6):3325-3342. doi: 10.1007/s00394-021-02506-2. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
We tested the acute effect of breakfast (ready-to-eat-cereal [RTEC] and milk) versus (vs.) no breakfast on cognitive function and subjective state in adolescents.
Healthy adolescents (n = 234) aged 11-13 years were recruited to take part in this school-based, acute, randomised, controlled, parallel groups trial with two interventions; Breakfast or No Breakfast. The breakfast intervention consisted of ad libitum intake of RTEC (up to 70 g) with milk (up to 300 ml) administered in a naturalistic school breakfast programme environment. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and + 70 and + 215 min post-intervention in a group-testing situation, similar to a school classroom context. The CANTAB test battery included: Simple Reaction Time (SRT), 5-Choice Reaction Time (5-CRT), Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP), and Paired Associates Learning (PAL; primary outcome). Data collection commenced January 2011 and ended May 2011. This trial was retrospectively registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03979027 on 07/06/2019.
A significant effect of the intervention (CMH[1] = 7.29, p < 0.01) was found for the number of levels achieved on the PAL task. A significant difference between interventions was found when baseline performance reached level 2 (JT, z = 2.58, p < 0.01), such that 100% of participants in the breakfast intervention reached the maximum level 4 but only 41.7% of those in the no breakfast intervention reached level 4. A significant baseline*intervention interaction (F[1,202] = 6.95, p < 0.01) was found for total errors made on the PAL task, indicating that participants who made above-average errors at baseline reduced the total number of errors made at subsequent test sessions following breakfast consumption whilst those in the no breakfast intervention did not. There was a positive effect of breakfast on reaction time and visual-sustained attention. The results also demonstrated interactions of intervention with baseline cognitive performance, such that breakfast conferred a greater advantage for performance when baseline performance was poorer.
Consuming breakfast has a positive acute effect on cognition in adolescents.
我们测试了早餐(即食谷物[RTEC]和牛奶)与不吃早餐相比对青少年认知功能和主观状态的急性影响。
我们招募了 234 名年龄在 11-13 岁的健康青少年,参与这项基于学校的、急性的、随机的、对照的平行组试验,有两种干预措施:早餐组和无早餐组。早餐干预包括在自然的学校早餐计划环境中自由摄入 RTEC(最多 70 克)和牛奶(最多 300 毫升)。在类似于学校教室环境的小组测试环境中,在干预后+70 和+215 分钟时对认知功能进行评估。CANTAB 测试包括:简单反应时间(SRT)、5 选择反应时间(5-CRT)、快速视觉信息处理(RVIP)和配对联想学习(PAL;主要结果)。数据收集于 2011 年 1 月开始,2011 年 5 月结束。该试验于 2019 年 7 月 6 日在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 上作为 NCT03979027 号进行了回顾性登记。
在 PAL 任务的达到的水平数量上,干预有显著效果(CMH[1] = 7.29,p < 0.01)。当基线表现达到 2 级时,干预之间存在显著差异(JT,z = 2.58,p < 0.01),因此早餐干预组的 100%参与者达到了最高 4 级,但无早餐干预组只有 41.7%的参与者达到 4 级。在 PAL 任务的总错误上,发现了显著的基线*干预相互作用(F[1,202] = 6.95,p < 0.01),表明基线时犯了高于平均错误的参与者在食用早餐后减少了后续测试阶段的总错误数量,而无早餐干预组则没有。早餐对反应时间和视觉持续注意力有积极影响。结果还表明,干预与基线认知表现之间存在相互作用,即当基线表现较差时,早餐对表现有更大的优势。
在青少年中,早餐对认知有积极的急性影响。