Suppr超能文献

2001 - 2008年美国国家健康与营养检查调查:成年人中不同早餐模式下的营养摄入、饮食质量及体重/肥胖参数与不吃早餐的比较

Nutrient intake, diet quality, and weight/adiposity parameters in breakfast patterns compared with no breakfast in adults: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2008.

作者信息

O'Neil Carol E, Nicklas Theresa A, Fulgoni Victor L

出版信息

J Acad Nutr Diet. 2014 Dec;114(12 Suppl):S27-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.08.021. Epub 2014 Nov 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The effect of different breakfast consumption patterns on nutrient intake, diet quality, and weight/adiposity status is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To compare nutrient intake, diet quality, and weight/adiposity measures of consumers assigned to different breakfast patterns with breakfast skippers.

DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS

These associations were assessed in adults 19+ years (N=18,988) participating in the 2001-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Intake was determined from 1-day 24-hour dietary recall. Diet quality was quantified using the Healthy Eating Index-2005. Body mass index (calculated as kg/m(2)) and waist circumferences were determined. Twelve patterns (including No Breakfast [approximately 19% of population]), explaining 58% of the variance in energy from the breakfast meal, were examined. Covariate adjusted general linear models were used to compare nutrient intakes, Healthy Eating Index-2005 scores, and body mass index/waist circumference of consumers of different patterns with breakfast skippers. The P value was Bonferroni corrected (<0.05/12 breakfast patterns <0.0042).

RESULTS

Consumers of the Grain/100% Fruit Juice and Presweetened Ready-to-Eat Cereal (RTEC)/Lower-Fat Milk patterns had lower daily intakes of nutrients to limit (added sugars, saturated fatty acids, solid fats, cholesterol, and sodium) than breakfast skippers. Consumers of the Grain/100% Fruit Juice; Presweetened RTEC/Lower-Fat Milk; and RTEC/Lower-Fat Milk/Whole Fruit/100% Fruit Juice patterns had higher daily intakes of all shortfall nutrients examined (dietary fiber; vitamins A, D, and C; calcium, potassium, folate, iron, and magnesium) than breakfast skippers. Consumers of the Grain/100% Fruit Juice; Grain; Presweetened RTEC/Lower-Fat Milk; RTEC/Lower-Fat Milk/Whole Fruit/100% Fruit Juice; Cooked Cereal; Lower-Fat Milk/Whole Fruit; and Whole Fruit patterns had higher Healthy Eating Index-2005 scores than breakfast skippers. Consumers of the Grain/100% Fruit Juice; Presweetened RTEC/Lower-Fat Milk; RTEC/Lower-Fat Milk/Whole Fruit/100% Fruit Juice; and Cooked Cereal patterns had lower body mass indexes and waist circumferences than breakfast skippers.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest dietary and weight advantages of consuming breakfast, especially ones that include grains, cereals, lower-fat milk, and whole fruit/100% fruit juice, in contrast to the potential adverse effects of skipping breakfast.

摘要

背景

不同早餐消费模式对营养摄入、饮食质量以及体重/肥胖状况的影响尚不清楚。

目的

比较分配到不同早餐模式的消费者与不吃早餐者的营养摄入、饮食质量和体重/肥胖指标。

设计与参与者

在参与2001 - 2008年国家健康与营养检查调查的19岁及以上成年人(N = 18,988)中评估这些关联。通过1天24小时饮食回顾确定摄入量。使用2005年健康饮食指数对饮食质量进行量化。测定体重指数(以千克/平方米计算)和腰围。研究了12种模式(包括不吃早餐[约占人口的19%]),这些模式解释了早餐能量差异的58%。使用协变量调整的一般线性模型比较不同模式消费者与不吃早餐者的营养摄入量、2005年健康饮食指数得分以及体重指数/腰围。P值经邦费罗尼校正(<0.05/12种早餐模式<0.0042)。

结果

谷物/100%果汁和预加糖即食谷物(RTEC)/低脂牛奶模式的消费者每日摄入的应限制营养素(添加糖、饱和脂肪酸、固体脂肪、胆固醇和钠)比不吃早餐者少。谷物/100%果汁、预加糖RTEC/低脂牛奶、RTEC/低脂牛奶/全水果/100%果汁模式的消费者每日摄入的所有缺乏营养素(膳食纤维、维生素A、D和C、钙、钾、叶酸、铁和镁)均高于不吃早餐者。谷物/100%果汁、谷物、预加糖RTEC/低脂牛奶、RTEC/低脂牛奶/全水果/100%果汁、煮制谷物、低脂牛奶/全水果、全水果模式的消费者2005年健康饮食指数得分高于不吃早餐者。谷物/100%果汁、预加糖RTEC/低脂牛奶、RTEC/低脂牛奶/全水果/100%果汁、煮制谷物模式的消费者体重指数和腰围低于不吃早餐者。

结论

结果表明,与不吃早餐的潜在不良影响相比,吃早餐具有饮食和体重方面的优势,尤其是包含谷物、谷类、低脂牛奶和全水果/100%果汁的早餐。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验